| 
| 
| | | Posted by algorithm Just looking for something that takes decent photos for under $500 if that’s possible. Nothing crazy but I just need something to upgrade off my phone. |
| | | Posted by Billy So I have been using a Sony Cybershot T-100 and a Canon S5 IS for about the last two years between the two for my exploring, and I am finally getting to where just having pictures despite quality isn't enough for me! I want pictures that arn't grainy, that I didn't have to take six times to get a good clear one, or that look good on the 2 inch LCD screen, but when I get home I find are blurryish or just plain not that well. I'm tired of point and shoot at 8 mega pixels damn it! So i've decided to take it up a notch. I was wondering if anyone had any pointers, tips, personal stories of trial and error, encouragement, discouragement, anything. |
| | This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.| Posted by Ghostofthelens Personally I use three to four cameras when I shoot. My main is a Nikon N-90 (film), Nikon D-100 (digital), and a Diana F+ for some more artistic shots. I sometimes also break out my old N-75, but that one is up for sale so do not use it much. Also for a good resource, B&H Photography is a good place to look, new and used they have some very good products and equipment. This is who I use, and have for over 4 years now. |
| | | Posted by blackhawk B&H is where the pros go to buy cams and gear. |
| | | | | Posted by McQueen1043 Best affordable long-life camcorder? Asking for future trip. |
| | | | | | | | | | | Posted by goon1 Does anyone have advice on the best camera to buy to capture explorations? |
| | 
| | | | | Posted by JokerSpecter What about, "What's a good middle-level camera that can use lenses from multiple manufacturers and not just their own? And around the $300 area." |
| | | Posted by southshore Nikon D7000 is still a great camera and can be had used in the $300 range. I used Tokina 11-16mm and about 10 other lenses including old film Sigmas, Rokinon, and of course the classic Nikon film lenses. Most post 1978 Nikon F mount lenses (and any clones) will work on just about every Nikon body (FX & 35mm and crop) |
| | | | | What about, "What's a good middle-level camera that can use lenses from multiple manufacturers and not just their own? And around the $300 area." |
| Nikon D7000 is still a great camera and can be had used in the $300 range. I used Tokina 11-16mm and about 10 other lenses including old film Sigmas, Rokinon, and of course the classic Nikon film lenses. Most post 1978 Nikon F mount lenses (and any clones) will work on just about every Nikon body (FX & 35mm and crop) |
| I currently have a Canon Rebel T4i. It's a great beginner camera, but I've been wanting to upgrade to something more advanced for a while. I also have a Nikon D90 (family camera, not just mine), but I much prefer Canon. Although I've been eyeing the Sony a7ii, I'm probably going to end up getting the Canon 80D for two reasons. 1) Price: The Sony a7ii is expensive, AND I'd have to get all new lenses for it 2) Familiarity: The 80D is similar to the T4i, but it's much more advanced Any suggestions? Thanks in advance. |
| | | Posted by southshore This isn't geared at anyone- just my two cents on why I have what I have now and why its a solid choice for exploring. I sold my Canon 7D and all of her lenses a couple months ago and switched to just using a Sony RX100... it's a prosumer grade point and shoot geared towards pros to have a capable and small second camera. http://electrohub....e95/r/x/rx100b.jpg It has performed quite well. I use it for everything from exploring to shots around the city I live in. The biggest thing IMO is that it has a 1" sensor which is a HUGE advantage as opposed to other point and shoots. It also shoots in RAW, packs a wide enough lens with good enough zoom, and the pictures are REALLY sharp. Menus, settings, and options that are geared to a well versed shooter versus a noob. The size, though not a compact point and shoot, it is a pocket camera and fits nice in the pocket for exploring. There are different versions/"marks" of the RX100 but I can only comment on the original (which has been in production for almost 7 years now) but all of the versions have the same 20.2mp 1" sensor. Here's a couple of shots with it. https://farm2.stat...0_c03dc5ac41_z.jpg https://farm5.stat...7_3e316ca47f_z.jpg https://farm5.stat...7_f870f4e59e_z.jpg https://farm5.stat...5_43e70288ef_z.jpg |
| | | Posted by southshore This isn't geared at anyone- just my two cents on why I have what I have now and why its a solid choice for exploring. I sold my Canon 7D and all of her lenses a couple months ago and switched to just using a Sony RX100... it's a prosumer grade point and shoot geared towards pros to have a capable and small second camera. http://electrohub....e95/r/x/rx100b.jpg It has performed quite well. I use it for everything from exploring to shots around the city I live in. The biggest thing IMO is that it has a 1" sensor which is a HUGE advantage as opposed to other point and shoots. It also shoots in RAW, packs a wide enough lens with good enough zoom, and the pictures are REALLY sharp. Menus, settings, and options that are geared to a well versed shooter versus a noob. The size, though not a compact point and shoot, it is a pocket camera and fits nice in the pocket for exploring. There are different versions/"marks" of the RX100 but I can only comment on the original (which has been in production for almost 7 years now) but all of the versions have the same 20.2mp 1" sensor. Here's a couple of shots with it. https://farm2.stat...0_c03dc5ac41_z.jpg https://farm5.stat...7_3e316ca47f_z.jpg https://farm5.stat...7_f870f4e59e_z.jpg https://farm5.stat...5_43e70288ef_z.jpg |
| This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |