|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
972 online
Server Time:
2024-04-26 15:00:42
|
|
|
Sinister Crayon
Location: Colorado Gender: Male
| | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 60 on 2/11/2007 8:21 PM >
| | | Posted by DeMiNe0 Their servers cost around 1grand. They don't use the best equipment. They use what is nessary to run the site to minimize costs.
|
a P4 with 2 GB of ram won't run you more than 300 hundred dollars.
|
|
tijeff
Location: Montreal Gender: Male
| | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 61 on 2/11/2007 11:24 PM >
| | | Posted by Sinister Crayon
a P4 with 2 GB of ram won't run you more than 300 hundred dollars.
|
At 300$, You think It'll be more reliable than the actual server ? You need some redundant hard-drive , power supply, fans, backup ext .... If not , it won't be any better than now I think At 1000$ is a god start , but personally , I think the more reliable way it to pay for some hosting. [last edit 2/11/2007 11:28 PM by tijeff - edited 2 times]
|
|
Stalker
Location: Hamilton
Your Resident Red Commie Bastard
| | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 62 on 2/11/2007 11:40 PM >
| | | As IT and Network Admin I say that usual uptime is 99% per year. So do some 2nd grade math and you get... 361 days uptime. So they had 4 days.( or in case of 99.9% uptime they had day and 20 hours) They used 2 days. I say stick to current host.
|
|
DeMiNe0
Location: Brooklyn, NY Gender: Male
DeMiNe0.CoM
| | | | | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 63 on 2/12/2007 12:48 AM >
| | | Posted by Sinister Crayon
a P4 with 2 GB of ram won't run you more than 300 hundred dollars.
|
Ya... for a regular tower PC with 2 fans, and no redundancy. A server class Box though is alot more expensive.
Stalker also has a very good point. [last edit 2/12/2007 12:48 AM by DeMiNe0 - edited 1 times]
HtTp://WwW.DeMiNe0.CoM |
|
Avatar-X Alpha Husky
Location: West Coast Gender: Male
yay!
| | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 64 on 2/12/2007 1:50 PM >
| | | Sure, when you look at it now, it seems like such a short amount of time. 2 days. Big deal. However, it wasn't the downtime -- it was the frustration of not being able to reach anyone and not knowing what was going on. It was like a nightmare. Nobody knew anything. My emails went unanswered. Those that did get answered didn't tell me anything I didn't already know. ("Your server is pinging but is not accessible", gee thanks moron). I was in telephone redirection hell. I would gladly pay a little bit more money to move to a company where they actually know the story and answer the phone. I've been looking at The Planet -- www.theplanet.com -- For $199, I can get a server that's more powerful than the one we use now, and they're support is apparently top-notch. -av
huskies - such fluff. |
|
TurboZutek King Dick
Location: Scotland Gender: Male
Giant octo-penised rapephant
| | | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 65 on 2/12/2007 2:18 PM >
| | | Posted by Avatar-X However, it wasn't the downtime -- it was the frustration of not being able to reach anyone and not knowing what was going on.
|
That, to me, is reason enough in itself for telling your current host to get stuffed. I can forgive all manner of accidents, mistakes or technical failures: as long as an organisation is honest and forthcoming in their customer service. If not, they don't get my money. Just my .02c Chris...
We all had ostriches. My dad had an ostrich farm! I remember one day someone came in and said the high altitude bombing of Kosovo had been a limited success, so we all went out and celebrated… by killing an ostrich and boiling it in kiwi fruit. |
|
z0th
Location: /dev/urandom Gender: Male
On the bleeding edge of cocking things up.
| | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 66 on 2/12/2007 11:47 PM >
| | | Posted by Avatar-X I would gladly pay a little bit more money to move to a company where they actually know the story and answer the phone. |
it really does come down to price vs. customer-support/service. nothing is better than a straight answer. thats really all most people want. and it _is_ worth paying a bit extra for to get one.
I've been looking at The Planet -- www.theplanet.com -- For $199, I can get a server that's more powerful than the one we use now, and they're support is apparently top-notch. |
just make sure that they put in proper forward _and_ reverse DNS for you if you are running SMTP services off of them. ive noted quite a few mta's on their services that dont have proper DNS.
gallery | deviantart | flickr |
|
seany
Location: Santa Clara, California, USA Gender: Male
| | | | | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 67 on 2/13/2007 1:04 AM >
| | | my previous comments aside (omg vm's r00l!... cough). I have a server at serverbeach that's been up for quite a while now (3 years?). i've had my bumps with them, but overall they've treated me well.
|
|
Hlywud
Location: Lethbridge, AB Gender: Female
| | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 68 on 2/13/2007 2:27 AM >
| | | Posted by Avatar-X Sure, when you look at it now, it seems like such a short amount of time. 2 days. Big deal. However, it wasn't the downtime -- it was the frustration of not being able to reach anyone and not knowing what was going on. It was like a nightmare. Nobody knew anything. My emails went unanswered. Those that did get answered didn't tell me anything I didn't already know. ("Your server is pinging but is not accessible", gee thanks moron). I was in telephone redirection hell. I would gladly pay a little bit more money to move to a company where they actually know the story and answer the phone. I've been looking at The Planet -- www.theplanet.com -- For $199, I can get a server that's more powerful than the one we use now, and they're support is apparently top-notch. -av
|
In my opinion, frustrations aside a 2 day downtime is just not acceptable - especially since you're a paying customer. I work in IT and if the application I work on was down for 2 days I'd be out of a job real quick. $49 over the current hosting cost is a very small price to pay for top-notch service. I certainly don't mind contributing a bit extra. [last edit 2/13/2007 4:33 AM by Hlywud - edited 1 times]
Ambivalent? Well yes and no |
|
DeMiNe0
Location: Brooklyn, NY Gender: Male
DeMiNe0.CoM
| | | | | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 69 on 2/13/2007 8:49 AM >
| | | Give em a try. I can also stand up for the-planet. They are a good company.
HtTp://WwW.DeMiNe0.CoM |
|
nostra-YOUPPI! Umpire
Location: Shahre:'on Kaybec
Bonsoir et cest partie
| | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 70 on 2/13/2007 4:55 PM >
| | | Posted by Hlywud
In my opinion, frustrations aside a 2 day downtime is just not acceptable - especially since you're a paying customer. I work in IT and if the application I work on was down for 2 days I'd be out of a job real quick. $49 over the current hosting cost is a very small price to pay for top-notch service. I certainly don't mind contributing a bit extra.
|
i agree, where i used to work we provided IT services to 2000 users in an aerospace plant. INternet access was one of the SLA indicies and if it was down for more than 5 minutes we had to start paying penalties. Because of that the T1 line was our main and if it failed we had an ISDN connection to fall back on. 2 days outage is unnaceptable in the IT world especially in a world of webhosting, if it was a commercial site im sure they would have been on it faster than flies to a pile of dogshit.
Montreal Expos 1969-2004 Forever Proud Lets Keep The Dream Alive |
|
DeMiNe0
Location: Brooklyn, NY Gender: Male
DeMiNe0.CoM
| | | | | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 71 on 2/14/2007 6:19 AM >
| | | You would be very surprised though on how bad some uptimes could be.... For example.... Would you rather have a host that has a major fuckup with 2 days of down time every 2 years? Or would you rather have a host that has an hour or 2 of downtime every few weeks?
HtTp://WwW.DeMiNe0.CoM |
|
Avatar-X Alpha Husky
Location: West Coast Gender: Male
yay!
| | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 72 on 2/14/2007 4:47 PM >
| | | The latter, of course. An hour of downtime, no biggie. Not good, but not awful. 2 days? That's missed emails, missed productivity, etc.
huskies - such fluff. |
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: Hosting options moving forward? Your opinion... <Reply # 73 on 2/14/2007 8:10 PM >
| | | Posted by Avatar-X The latter, of course. An hour of downtime, no biggie. Not good, but not awful. 2 days? That's missed emails, missed productivity, etc.
|
You deserved an ETA for the repair time, and you shouldn't have had to beat the bushes to get it.
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 78 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739253259 pages have been generated.
|
|