UER Mobile Forum UER Mobile - Not logged in
Home  Search   User Search   Login  Register  
Messages   New Posts   Favourites   Recent Posts   Recent Views   My LDB   My Buddies  

< (1)[2](3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21-24)>
UER Mobile > UE Main > Police and Security: Post their sweet rides (Viewed 155619 times)

post by PhotoSeeker   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 20 on 2/3/2009 12:30 PM >

1.





Reply with Quote


post by bourbonbaby   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 21 on 2/3/2009 3:55 PM >

Posted by PhotoSeeker
1.






FBI POLICE? ... what the?

why doesn't it just say Police Cops?


Reply with Quote


post by IIVQ   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 22 on 2/3/2009 4:14 PM >

Posted by bourbonbaby



FBI POLICE? ... what the?

why doesn't it just say Police Cops?


Besides, this must be a fake. Everyone knows that FBI only uses unmarked black vans/SUVs with tinted windows.

Tijmen


Reply with Quote


post by PhotoSeeker   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 23 on 2/3/2009 5:25 PM >

Actually, I laughed at this one too.

I took this picture outside the Hoover building in Washington DC. It was parked on the sidewalk in front of the building.

I agree though... FBI and POLICE on the same door seems kinda redundant, doesn't it?


Reply with Quote


post by manitou   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 24 on 2/3/2009 6:09 PM >

Apparently the FBI police are an actual police force.

http://www.fbijobs.gov/126.asp


Reply with Quote


post by imprezawrxsti   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 25 on 2/3/2009 6:54 PM >

Denver PD guarding the demo site at Gates.



and this is what happens when the dunkin donuts on Broadway closes early.






Reply with Quote


post by bourbonbaby   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 26 on 2/3/2009 6:58 PM >

FBI Police.
Really?! Wha? Why?....

Great...
Once again, I woke up in a stupider world.


[last edit 2/3/2009 6:59 PM by bourbonbaby - edited 1 times]

Reply with Quote


post by Calhovin   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 27 on 2/3/2009 7:02 PM >






Reply with Quote


post by velcrozeppelin   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 28 on 2/3/2009 7:02 PM >

i think you're missing the point that a charger interceptor is ONE HOT COP CAR.


Reply with Quote


post by Intrinsic   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 29 on 2/3/2009 7:07 PM >

Posted by velcrozeppelin
i think you're missing the point that a charger interceptor is ONE HOT COP CAR.


Oh yes.







Reply with Quote


post by velcrozeppelin   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 30 on 2/3/2009 7:19 PM >

Posted by sudbury
Oh yes.


When I lived in Ithaca for college, the city bought 2 of the super-beefy 6.1L Hemi Chargers for their force. I had one open up the throttle next to me driving up a long, fairly steep hill, and it still took off like a bat out of hell. I'll never forget how fucking awesome that 425HP aluminum block sounded.

Plus, a cop car with a functional hood scoop. Talk about insta-boner.

[last edit 2/3/2009 7:20 PM by velcrozeppelin - edited 1 times]

Reply with Quote


post by cr400   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 31 on 2/3/2009 7:24 PM >

Not pursuit rated, but just as cool as a new charger.

123355.jpg (27 kb, 400x267)
click to view





Reply with Quote


post by bourbonbaby   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 32 on 2/3/2009 7:25 PM >

No no, I agree. The car is a wonderful pursuit / bad mother vehicle. FBI police just blows my mind.


Reply with Quote


post by imprezawrxsti   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 33 on 2/3/2009 7:28 PM >

Posted by velcrozeppelin
i think you're missing the point that a charger interceptor is ONE HOT COP CAR.


Colorado State Patrol likes 'em, too.



But it's not necessarily the Chargers you need to worry about...



[last edit 2/4/2009 5:16 AM by imprezawrxsti - edited 1 times]

Reply with Quote


post by Intrinsic   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 34 on 2/3/2009 7:40 PM >

Italian State Police Lamborghini (309 km/h)

An older video, and not a vehicle that I've ever encountered during my adventures but it's still a cool video


http://www.ebaumsw...video/watch/17856/





[last edit 2/3/2009 7:41 PM by Intrinsic - edited 1 times]

Reply with Quote


post by sYnOnYx   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 35 on 2/3/2009 8:41 PM >

I seen that same FBI car in a episode of 24....


Reply with Quote


post by Ninemillimeter   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 36 on 2/3/2009 9:23 PM >

If I remember right the van belongs to a constable in a town somewhere between Vergenns and Rutland. In Vermont some smaller towns can't afford to start a real police department. These towns elect a constable, they use their own vehicle with a light bar strapped on top. They have the swager of a rent-a-cop with the authority of a state trooper.


Reply with Quote


post by velcrozeppelin   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 37 on 2/3/2009 9:31 PM >

My uncle was a constable in his town for a while (tiny little western Mass town) and he used his 84 Civic Hatchback or my Grandfather's 90's Ford F350, depending on the weather.

[last edit 2/3/2009 9:31 PM by velcrozeppelin - edited 1 times]

Reply with Quote


post by Axle   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 38 on 2/3/2009 9:42 PM >

Some security just have to depend on their own two feet...


I would if the only other vehicles on site were...



or..



Although getting chased by a bobcat would be pretty interesting...scoop ya right up.


Reply with Quote


post by don_corleyone   |  | 
Re: Police and Security: Post their sweet rides
<Reply # 39 on 2/3/2009 11:39 PM >

3rd floor of curry:




Reply with Quote



Reply
< (1)[2](3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21-24)>


This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.



109 ms gen time