 |
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
 White Rabbit
   
Women's Advocate
Location: Missouri
Gender: Male
 |  |  | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 40 on 2/12/2007 2:24 PM >
|  | | | Posted by Alias
P.S White Rabbit take peoples I have watched u post pics from behind a house before, |
You know what? What the fuck is with this bashing where I've taken pictures stuff?
1. I've taken pictures in riskier and crazier places than 99% of the people on this forum.
2. I've had to pull most of it because I've been threatened with lawsuits literally more than anyone on this forum.
3. Both you and Ryan would know this if you had been around here a little longer.
Jesus, seriously. "You don't post pictures from hardcore places!" I mean, seriously, not only isn't it true, but it's retarded.
dont just use the P mode on the camera, try the fully manual settings as from what I can see you are either using P or auto and telling the camera to bracket the image.
|
*sigh*
No, it was not P mode. It was manual mode. It was like f4.0, with an exposure starting at 30" and ISO 400 and going down one EV stop for five pictures.
[last edit 2/12/2007 2:30 PM by White Rabbit - edited 2 times]
Underground Ozarks http://www.undergroundozarks.com
Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Kansas |
|
White Rabbit
Women's Advocate
Location: Missouri
Gender: Male
| | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 41 on 2/12/2007 2:30 PM >
| | | | Posted by Alias
read a book, set up the camera on F22 on a 1 min exposure the F22 will stop the overexposing on the bright bits adn help to keep the whole image in focus.
|
Let me just say this for the millionth time. I believe you're underestimating how dark it was.
For starters, my camera doesn't bulb exposure, so the highest I can go is 30". But, I'm about to show why I don't think it would matter anyway.
I took a test photo when I was down there at f8.0 at 30". It was almost completely pitch black with only the reflection on the water really visible.
So, I'm relatively certain that a picture taken at f22 for 60" would be almost as bad.
Underground Ozarks http://www.undergroundozarks.com
Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Kansas |
|
Alias
 
Location: UK
Gender: Male
www.nicholas-ada ms.co.uk
| | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 42 on 2/12/2007 2:35 PM >
| | | | both those images were taken in Pitch Black I dont care how hardcore u think u are etc... your photography skills are appalling u use HDR to try and make it look more interesting sorry but it just does not work. You obviously have no idea about photography the fact I do and so does Ryan and u are arguing just makes u look stupider and stupider everytime u reply to this topic.
www.nicholas-adams.co.uk |
|
White Rabbit
Women's Advocate
Location: Missouri
Gender: Male
| | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 44 on 2/12/2007 2:44 PM >
| | | | Posted by Alias
both those images were taken in Pitch Black I dont care how hardcore u think u are etc... your photography skills are appalling u use HDR to try and make it look more interesting sorry but it just does not work. You obviously have no idea about photography the fact I do and so does Ryan and u are arguing just makes u look stupider and stupider everytime u reply to this topic.
|
(Hey. I can't see those two pictures you posted, because the work firewall blocks that site. You'll have to post them on here for me to look at them.)
I did, however, just look at your site, specifically at your Underground and Drains pictures section.
And as of right now, I am no longer taking anything you say seriously. Because your pictures look like ass. Seriously. Several pages of smeary-light painting pictures. They're horrible. My crappy flash pictures that I took with my old point and shoot look better. I don't even know how you've got the nerve to be in here criticizing anyone else after seeing those.
Underground Ozarks http://www.undergroundozarks.com
Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Kansas |
|
Alias
Location: UK
Gender: Male
www.nicholas-ada ms.co.uk
| | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 45 on 2/12/2007 2:51 PM >
| | | | | And as of right now, I am no longer taking anything you say seriously. Because your pictures look like ass. Seriously. Several pages of smeary-light painting pictures. They're horrible. My crappy flash pictures that I took with my old point and shoot look better. I don't even know how you've got the nerve to be in here criticizing anyone else after seeing those. |
have u seen the images u post, I rest my case you are an idiot who cannot accept when he is wrong. YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT PHOTOGRAPHY THAT HAS BEEN PROVEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN WHEN U POST SHIT IMAGES AND POOR ATTEMPTS AT HDR WHEN HDR SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN USED.
as for my images being shit well that is personal opinion as for them being smeary light painted images, well yes I do use light painting, but it looks a damn sight better than most of the shit u post.
www.nicholas-adams.co.uk |
|
Alias
Location: UK
Gender: Male
www.nicholas-ada ms.co.uk
| | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 46 on 2/12/2007 2:52 PM >
| | | | P.S have u ever heard of an image loosing quality when compressed all the images on my site are compressed whats ur excuse?
www.nicholas-adams.co.uk |
|
dsankt
Location: live and in the fresh
| |  | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 48 on 2/12/2007 4:02 PM >
| | | | congrats to all the winnars.
sleepycity.net: watch out for the third rail baby, that shit is high voltage. urbex and urban exploration photography |
|
tullo
Location: Belleville New Jersey
Gender: Female
| | | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 49 on 2/12/2007 4:13 PM >
| | | | Posted by dsankt
congrats to all the winnars.
|
LOL at that cat, ahahaahaah
http://www.designedbreakdown.com |
|
IrIsHmOm
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Gender: Female
I'll kill your face...
| | | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 51 on 2/12/2007 4:29 PM >
| | | | Posted by dsankt
congrats to all the winnars.
|
That is the cutest thing I have seen in days!!!
Alias, he's already said he didnt know anything about photography, and apparently you really don't either. Give it up. This is stupid. WR, IGNORE him. He doesn't know anymore than you.
And everybody else, if you look at the picture, you can tell that it can't be done with single exposure. You weren't there, so you can't be telling him that it could be. I wasn't either, but you can look and tell! Come on now. I've seen much worse pics on here than this one.
|
|
White Rabbit
Women's Advocate
Location: Missouri
Gender: Male
| | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 52 on 2/12/2007 4:38 PM >
| | | | Posted by IrIsHmOm
That is the cutest thing I have seen in days!!!
Alias, he's already said he didnt know anything about photography, and apparently you really don't either. Give it up. This is stupid. WR, IGNORE him. He doesn't know anymore than you.
And everybody else, if you look at the picture, you can tell that it can't be done with single exposure. You weren't there, so you can't be telling him that it could be. I wasn't either, but you can look and tell! Come on now. I've seen much worse pics on here than this one.
|
Jesus, this whole thread has been ridiculous. I just wanted some critiquing of the photograph. What I could've done better, what I shouldn't have done, how to make a better HDR, etc. I so don't mind harsh criticism either.
But if you tell me something that I know isn't true (that I could've taken pretty much the same photograph just by tweaking my camera settings a bit more), I'm going to disagree with you. Maybe I could've taken a smeary light painting with a bright flashlight. Maybe I could've taken a similar (but different) picture with a bunch of additional light sources placed through the tunnel. But the same picture? No. You could not have.
But if a couple of thin-skinned guys with chips on their shoulders are going to get COMPLETELY hysterical when I tell them they're wrong, that's getting pretty ridiculous. I mean, going nuts about how I'm not a hardcore explorer? Well, not only isn't it true, it's sad that anyone even went there in an argument.
And SCREAMING in all caps about how I know nothing about photography? What the fuck? Seriously. Get a grip.
And if you're going to lecture someone about photography in the most elitist and condescending way possible, your pictures better be amazing. From what I can see, that isn't the case here.
Underground Ozarks http://www.undergroundozarks.com
Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Kansas |
|
IrIsHmOm
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Gender: Female
I'll kill your face...
| | | | Re: JC Tunnel HDR
<Reply # 53 on 2/12/2007 4:42 PM >
| | | | Posted by White Rabbit
Jesus, this whole thread has been ridiculous. I just wanted some critiquing of the photograph. What I could've done better, what I shouldn't have done, how to make a better HDR, etc. I so don't mind harsh criticism either.
But if you tell me something that I know isn't true (that I could've taken pretty much the same photograph just by tweaking my camera settings a bit more), I'm going to disagree with you. Maybe I could've taken a smeary light painting with a bright flashlight. Maybe I could've taken a similar (but different) picture with a bunch of additional light sources placed through the tunnel. But the same picture? No. You could not have.
But if a couple of thin-skinned guys with chips on their shoulders are going to get COMPLETELY hysterical when I tell them they're wrong, that's getting pretty ridiculous. I mean, going nuts about how I'm not a hardcore explorer? Well, not only isn't it true, it's sad that anyone even went there in an argument.
And SCREAMING in all caps about how I know nothing about photography? What the fuck? Seriously. Get a grip.
And if you're going to lecture someone about photography in the most elitist and condescending way possible, your pictures better be amazing. From what I can see, that isn't the case here.
|
not sure if I have made this clear or not but, I like it. ^_^
It looks 100x better than my hdr's i try to do.
(You've seen how i get done... don't worry about it.)
But I like it the way it is, much better than the single exposure. So yeah. Flaming you is not gonna help your photography at all, so ignore that and focus on the constructive things that are said.
I <3 WR!!
|
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 78 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739634140 pages have been generated.
|
|
