Infiltration
THEORY
Ethics
Observations
 
PRACTICE
Abandoned Sites
Boats
Churches
Drains/Catacombs
Hotels/Hospitals
Transit Tunnels
Utility Tunnels
Various
 
RESOURCES
Exploration Timeline
Infilnews
Infilspeak Dictionary
Usufruct Blog
Worldwide Links
Infiltration Forums home | search | login | register

Reply
Page: < 1 2 3 > 
Infiltration Forums > Private Boards Index > Film photography > EKTAR 100(Viewed 12034 times)
argonian location:
Toronto, ON
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 20 on 8/6/2009 5:58 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
That ain't square.



Que pasa, baby?
yokes location:
Toronto
 
 |  |  | AIM Message | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 21 on 8/6/2009 11:04 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by RenegadeOfFunk


I am loving this shot. What camera did you shoot this on? Is it 6x6 or are you cropping?


Mamiya RB67



"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water and stupid men." - Richard Nickel
RenegadeOfFunk location:
Boston, MA
 
 |  |  | AIM Message
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 22 on 8/10/2009 10:59 PM >
Posted on Forum: Infiltration ForumsQuote
Haha, wow I feel stupid.



aaronni location:
South Puget Sound
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 23 on 8/11/2009 5:04 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Great shots Yokes & Renegade, love the coal breaker's tones.

I've been dragging my heels on developing a few rolls of this film.



never know until you go
Quarantine location:
Denver
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 24 on 8/12/2009 5:53 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I get more and more impressed by this film. It looks like it may be a decent replacement for... dare I say... Kodachrome? Not as bland as other C41 films, and not as garish as some Fuji E-6's.



STACKflyer location:
del a where?
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 25 on 8/12/2009 9:30 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Just got a roll developed. I have some light leaks that I need to get fixed. Taken with a Canon FTb. Let me know what you all think.

http://www.flickr....kcallahan/?saved=1



http://www.flickr....s/patrickcallahan/
tron_2.0 location:
Ohio
 
 |  |  | AIM Message | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 26 on 1/13/2010 12:10 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Too bad they don't make it for 4x5



[quote][i]Posted by yokes[/i]
I find your lack of coziness.... disturbing.
[/quote]
yokes location:
Toronto
 
 |  |  | AIM Message | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 27 on 1/13/2010 12:27 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I would LOVE to have it in 4x5



"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water and stupid men." - Richard Nickel
willskith location:
Boston, MA
 
 |  |  | AIM Message | Future Impaired
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 28 on 1/21/2010 8:51 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I've shot 3 or 4 rolls of it, I enjoy it. It has a nice feel. It seems comparable to Reala, but Reala has better colors.

http://www.flickr....d/tags/kodakektar/



grit your teeth in the face of fear. self repression is the true sign of a coward, toss your inhibitions to the wind.
digital_me location:
Colorado
 
 |  |  | Flickr
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 29 on 1/23/2010 7:20 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I've also shot some rolls of it, I love it. Some example images (the images are linked to the flickr page in case you want to view the full size)









These are all long exposure images because, well, that's mostly what I do and what I want in a color negative film—something that will give me low grain and good colors. I've found that the Ektar delivers quite brilliantly on both counts. I have gotten some grain on the longer exposures, but that's mostly in very low light situations. The first image above was perhaps a two minute exposure and as one can see it has a certain amount of grain (not at all intolerable, however, and even attractive to a degree) due to the low light conditions. But I have some made some ten minute exposures on it (alas not posted to the tubes) that show very little grain due to the larger amount of light.

Given a choice, this is the only color negative film I'll shoot.

(I swear I'm not a Kodak shill! I use other films in E6/B&W!)



yokes location:
Toronto
 
 |  |  | AIM Message | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 30 on 1/23/2010 8:27 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
How do you find it to be for reciprocity failure?



"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water and stupid men." - Richard Nickel
Quarantine location:
Denver
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 31 on 1/24/2010 2:22 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I just got a roll back, it's good stuff. I too shot some longer exposures- I just did what the meter said and everything looks fine up to a couple minutes. IMHO, colour negative films have less reciprocity failure issues than B&W negative films.



digital_me location:
Colorado
 
 |  |  | Flickr
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 32 on 1/26/2010 2:27 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by yokes
How do you find it to be for reciprocity failure?

Oh, forgot to say. I haven't noticed any color shifts, and it seems to require exposures comparable to other color negative films.



briansbrains location:
valbona
 
 |  |  | \\\\\\\\\\
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 33 on 2/17/2010 12:12 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by yokes
I would LOVE to have it in 4x5




http://www.kodak.c...&CID=pressreleases


will be available in 4x5 and 8x10!



www.time-zero.net
Quarantine location:
Denver
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 34 on 2/18/2010 8:38 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
This is good news!



yokes location:
Toronto
 
 |  |  | AIM Message | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 35 on 2/19/2010 2:33 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by briansbrains




http://www.kodak.c...&CID=pressreleases


will be available in 4x5 and 8x10!


This makes me very happy.



"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water and stupid men." - Richard Nickel
tron_2.0 location:
Ohio
 
 |  |  | AIM Message | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 36 on 3/2/2010 3:22 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Excellent. But that means I have to actually spend money on film now.



[quote][i]Posted by yokes[/i]
I find your lack of coziness.... disturbing.
[/quote]
Kuroneko location:
Tokyo
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 37 on 10/28/2011 11:47 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
More info, and examples, of Ektar here:

http://www.filmwas...x.php?topic=2149.0

Neko.



Ghostofthelens location:
Pearland, Tx.
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 38 on 10/28/2011 6:18 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I may have to try some of their film. I talk to a rep from Kodak from time to time, I'll see what he thinks of it. Right now, he sells Kodak, but uses Fuji film, and admits it is better than Kodak.
I have had some many art shots ruined by using Kodak, I quit using any thing from them. I'll have to swing by, or order some film and see what I think.



Futurus partum par fabrica
Kuroneko location:
Tokyo
 
 |  | 
Re: EKTAR 100
<Reply # 39 on 10/29/2011 7:48 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by Ghostofthelens
I have had some many art shots ruined by using Kodak,


Their film, or their processing? I prefer Fuji's overall range myself, but Kodak's NC, VC, and now Ektar, are stellar films. Provided they are processed properly of course... Neko.





Infiltration Forums > Private Boards Index > Film photography > EKTAR 100(Viewed 12034 times)
Page: < 1 2 3 > 
Reply

Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.

Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 78 ms