|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
716 online
Server Time:
2024-05-09 23:58:30
|
|
|
Jondoe_264
Location: Under . . . Gender: Male
Yes! Sewers!
| | | My first roll of film! < on 2/8/2007 8:57 AM >
| | | Hi All! Haven't put any pics on the critiques board for a while. But I have a good reason to post these ones. I shot my first ever roll of film the other week, on my eBay purchased Nikon FM, I only had a 50mm lens so all pics taken using said lens. I was pretty happy with some of the pics. Here's a few, location is a London Storm Relief Sewer. 1
2
3
Thanks, JD [last edit 2/8/2007 9:39 AM by Jondoe_264 - edited 1 times]
". . . for this purpose the plans of Mr.Bazalgette are most effective." |
|
182 lbs of sad
Location: in the gym training my ass off! Gender: Male
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 2 on 2/8/2007 2:06 PM >
| | | good job. i enjoy the lighting.
Fight like a man Bleed like a man Die like a man |
|
NV Supreme Noble Donor
Location: City of Chicago, Richard M. Daley, Mayor
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 3 on 2/8/2007 5:10 PM >
| | | What type/brand of film?
|
|
Glass
Location: Chicago
as one does
| | | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 4 on 2/8/2007 5:40 PM >
| | | I'd like the first with more contrast, I think; though it is quite nice already. The others are a little overdone.
|
|
Sentinel
Location: Lawrence, KS Gender: Male
| | | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 5 on 2/8/2007 6:52 PM >
| | | I like number two a lot
|
|
Nyssa
Location: Los Angeles Gender: Female
Totally Sharky Complete
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 6 on 2/8/2007 8:29 PM >
| | | Damn. The colors, the lighting, the placement... It's beautiful. Actually makes me want to go draining. Great stuff. Show us more!
"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed." - Albert Einstein |
|
Vinsanity
Location: NJ Gender: Male
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 7 on 2/8/2007 10:21 PM >
| | | Excellent stuff, here. Welcome to the world of film. I hope you stick to it, and the Nikon FM10 was my first 35mm camera. Great choice. What kind of film/what ASA were you using? Looks to be maybe 100 as a guess. I need to start doing underground stuff. I love how excellent it all looks.
Who doesn't want to shoot fire from their ass? |
|
A. Lien
Location: Fantasy Island B.C. Gender: Male
Abductees Anonymous all welcome
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 9 on 2/9/2007 5:33 AM >
| | | Nice work. I love that bizarre skeleton thing in the first pic. There are a lot of advantages to film. I won't list them here now, or pretend to know all. (In summary tho, I mean latitude, and image quality per money spent) I bought new Nikon FM's and FE's when they came out in the early 80's. They have NEVER let me down. Including the MD 12 Motor Drive if you keep the terminals clean, and the bats fresh. And that noise grows on ya. In all honesty, I'm very tempted to go for a D 80, and likely will this year sometime. But guess what? NPH 400, or whatever they call it now, gives a better result! I'm talking a 16X20 ready for exhibition print. Wish I was wrong, and pls tell me how the quality (Megabites) (10.2 I think) translates to a well exposed piece of film on NPH 400, which is as good as the old Reala 100 I was addicted to for years. And without six hours in the Photo Shop Asylum trying to make it purdy! And if you want even better quality, slow transparency film is worth experimenting with. Also, it's nice not to have lab techs see work, or places, you might want to keep private. Advantage digital. So eventually I'll get a digital. Must say though, had many years of exceptional lab work done in Vancouver with no problems. Unfortunately not the same here. The best lab in a bigger city will likely have to have higher standards. A good lab is like, holy, or Guinness or something. Enjoy your great old camera, pardon my rant. [last edit 2/9/2007 12:24 PM by A. Lien - edited 2 times]
My sister is Charlotte Light and Dark. Who am I? Farewell and thank you... "I was doing something that I thought could have some impact someday. In many ways, it's really these photographs that kept me going creatively." Dennis Hopper |
|
Corvid
Location: Oxford, UK Gender: Male
Master of Illusion!!
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 10 on 2/9/2007 2:11 PM >
| | | Really like 3! Reminds me of looking into a working cement kiln!
|
|
laslow
Location: Tewksbury, MA
you have quite a temper for someone who takes pictures of flowers
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 11 on 2/9/2007 2:50 PM >
| | | better than my first roll of film. hah. i like them. well composed for the most part. last one = win.
the only complaint i have is that the last one looks better centered, and they need contrast/shadow adjusted to make the white parts white and the black parts black. for example: [last edit 2/9/2007 2:58 PM by laslow - edited 1 times]
|
|
mortimer
Location: teronno
| | | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 12 on 2/9/2007 4:52 PM >
| | | Nice shots, pretty good for a first try with film underground. See if you can pick up a nice old used, beat-up manual 20mm f3.5 for that FM, they shouldn't be very expensive. It's as wide as you'll need on that camera, and if you set the aperture at 5.6 and focus at infinity, everything from roughly 5 feet in front of you to infinity will be in focus. Which is a roundabout way of saying that I wish the person was a bit sharper in the last one. Nice light though, and aside from the fact that the colour balance is a bit off and they're a bit flat, they're all well-composed, well-lit shots. Better scans would probably help these quite a bit, I'm sure there's some details on the negs in those blown-out parts that just didn't show when the neg/print was scanned. Welcome to the film world, and careful with that camera - they don't make parts for that one anymore, although if you ever upgrade to the fm2, they still make parts for that.
yep. |
|
Air
Location: Canada
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 13 on 2/9/2007 5:00 PM >
| | | Posted by Jondoe_264 Thanks for comments guys! I won't be dumping digital entirely, but certainly will be shooting more film stuff. These were shot on Fujicolor Pro 160C, daylight neg.
got a few more rolls of it ready to go!
JD
|
I believe I've used this in 120 form. Fuji is nice, and much cheaper and easier to find online then kodak (which I also like). I'm currently trying NPZ 800iso which has minimal grain and I rated it 640iso. Try fooling around with the iso, it can make your images much punchier which I think would look great on what your photographing.
"The extraordinary beauty of things that fail." - Heinrich von Kleist |
|
Jondoe_264
Location: Under . . . Gender: Male
Yes! Sewers!
| | | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 14 on 2/9/2007 7:02 PM >
| | | Posted by mortimer Nice shots, pretty good for a first try with film underground. See if you can pick up a nice old used, beat-up manual 20mm f3.5 for that FM, they shouldn't be very expensive. It's as wide as you'll need on that camera, and if you set the aperture at 5.6 and focus at infinity, everything from roughly 5 feet in front of you to infinity will be in focus. Which is a roundabout way of saying that I wish the person was a bit sharper in the last one. Nice light though, and aside from the fact that the colour balance is a bit off and they're a bit flat, they're all well-composed, well-lit shots. Better scans would probably help these quite a bit, I'm sure there's some details on the negs in those blown-out parts that just didn't show when the neg/print was scanned. Welcome to the film world, and careful with that camera - they don't make parts for that one anymore, although if you ever upgrade to the fm2, they still make parts for that.
|
Yeah. That's all good! I've been hunting around for a 20mm or something there abouts since purchasing the body! One of the only things that niggled me about a good few of my shots was the iffy focus, most shots were pretty near to infinity but as I had it reasonably wide open the results were not so sharp where I'd have liked. Thanks for the advice, really appreciated! JD
". . . for this purpose the plans of Mr.Bazalgette are most effective." |
|
mortimer
Location: teronno
| | | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 15 on 2/9/2007 11:41 PM >
| | | One of the only things that niggled me about a good few of my shots was the iffy focus, most shots were pretty near to infinity but as I had it reasonably wide open the results were not so sharp where I'd have liked. Thanks for the advice, really appreciated! |
No problem. For more accurate advice and info, try the chart at the bottom of this page: http://www.cambrid...focal-distance.htm
yep. |
|
Shawn W.
Location: Niagara Falls, NY Gender: Male
Optimistic Pessimist
| | | | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 16 on 2/10/2007 2:06 AM >
| | | Very nice work. I especially like the first one.
What is a rebel? A man who says no. - Albert Camus |
|
MoonCat1337
Location: Danbury, CT Gender: Female
| | | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 17 on 2/11/2007 4:18 AM >
| | | wow that first shot is amazing! dont get lost!
|
|
secretdestroyers
Location: Baltimore Gender: Male
| | | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 18 on 2/11/2007 5:56 AM >
| | | very nice! the lighting in #1 is very good. the shadow in #2 makes it for me. without the shadow it would just be ok. in #3 i wish it was more a silhouette.
F this I"m going exploring! |
|
8secSplash
Location: Huntsville, Alabama Gender: Male
| | Re: My first roll of film! <Reply # 19 on 2/11/2007 7:10 PM >
| | | Very nice set, I like them all but #3 is the best IMO.
|
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 148 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741186451 pages have been generated.
|
|