Infiltration
THEORY
Ethics
Observations
 
PRACTICE
Abandoned Sites
Boats
Churches
Drains/Catacombs
Hotels/Hospitals
Transit Tunnels
Utility Tunnels
Various
 
RESOURCES
Exploration Timeline
Infilnews
Infilspeak Dictionary
Usufruct Blog
Worldwide Links
Infiltration Forums home | search | login | register

Reply
Infiltration Forums > UE Photography > This is the wrong film(Viewed 2527 times)
skatchkins location:
The Desert
 
 |  |  | No Stone Unturned Photography
This is the wrong film
< on 5/20/2015 8:01 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote

Untitled by Michael D'Avy, on Flickr

I found the need for lack of control. I fed it with film and an absence of dials.

Recently I'd supplemented my camera bag with a kitchy film camera that allowed full over-sprocket exposure of 35mm film. It was a fun relief to endless settings, exposures, photoshop processing, etc. While I have no intention of letting that side of me go, I found that I enjoyed the non-instant gratification and quirkiness of film.
And it's still work. While I let a shop do the developing, I still have to scan them in to be able to utilize the extra exposure area. Sometimes one by one. But I can scan while I do real job stuff so that's fine.

I recently figured out that with some modification I can shoot 35mm cans in my childhood Instamatic (takes 126 cartridges). Notch the film top, added a toothpick and an eye-screw, unroll it in the dark and jam it back in, taping the camera's seams to your liking to prevent full on light leaks. I shimmed a couple watch batteries with pennies to enable the camera's meter to choose the aperture for me.

I had procured an old Kodak Six-20 Model D Brownie that's been sitting on the shelf. I took it down thinking I could modify it for 120 rolls (almost the same size) but liking the simplicity, readiness of cheap film, and sprocket love, I wondered if it were possible to use more 35mm. Turns out it took almost no modifying to do. Jam the can in the film roll area, stretch it across, tape to the spool and your done. The 35 is almost half the size of unfindable Six-20 and it jams so tight, it doesn't move around and stays centered in the camera. It takes a little estimation with the viewfinders (top or side depending on landscape or portrait) on the part of composure since your not getting the full width but it makes a great long panorama. I taped a ring from a plastic coil binder to the film canister so you could count about 19 sprocket clicks to know how far to turn the wind knob for the next exposure. I was pleased with the results. The photos had a nice tone to them and were pretty sharp for 1/40 f/16. 400 film.

Camera 3 for the trip was the Sprocket Rocket but I wanted to try redscaling. So I took all the film out of a canister in the dark, and rerolled it backwards. This causes the red layer to expose first, yielding interesting results all in camera. For a plastic lens they came out pretty sharp. 1/100 f/11ish. 800 film.

I found a 1st year Instamatic for my friend and modified his for the trip and he brought his wife's grandpa's 1930's accordion style Kodak Six-16 that I set up the same as my Six-20 with a 35mm can. The Six-16 had setting controls and he put in unknown expired date 200 so sadly they did not come out.

It was a good city walk around for about 3hrs. Learning and guessing and not knowing how well anything would turn out. I was more than happy with my results. Good time.











































Brownie Used

Kodak Brownie Six-20 Model D by Michael D'Avy, on Flickr

Childhood Instamatic (with $6 lens kit)

Kodak Instamatic X35-F Telephoto by Michael D'Avy, on Flickr

Craigslist $5 Instamatics with lens kit attached

Gold Crest Instamatics by Michael D'Avy, on Flickr



Flickr Pitchrs
Astro
Usually naked
 
location:
The Delta Quadrant
 
 |  | 
Re: This is the wrong film
<Reply # 1 on 5/20/2015 8:14 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Ugh, I KNEW these were done on an insta! (I have a couple, myself)

When you shoot with the insta, do you do have to like scroll through to the next frame 2x to make sure they don't overlap? I did. I felt like I was wasting film, but it was the only way for them not to double expose parts of it.



[02:33:56] <Valkyre> Astro your whole life is ruled by the sentence ' life is better without clothes on'
[22:16:00] <DSomms> it was normal until astro got here
Astro: Patron Saint of Drains
Axle location:
Milton, ON
 
 |  | 
Re: This is the wrong film
<Reply # 2 on 5/20/2015 8:53 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
These are great! There's a rather sizable niche of those who do this little trick.

Whenever I see 'em I think...





Celer at Audax
Para la Victoria Siempre Alemanes!
skatchkins location:
The Desert
 
 |  |  | No Stone Unturned Photography
Re: This is the wrong film
<Reply # 3 on 5/21/2015 3:38 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Astro - yeah. The square ones are the Instamatics. And yes, I have to shoot 2 in between each one (against my arm for dark) to get it to advance far enough to avoid overlap.

Axle. Thanks. The niche is fun to play in



Flickr Pitchrs
Astro
Usually naked
 
location:
The Delta Quadrant
 
 |  | 
Re: This is the wrong film
<Reply # 4 on 5/21/2015 3:40 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by skatchkins
Astro - yeah. The square ones are the Instamatics. And yes, I have to shoot 2 in between each one (against my arm for dark) to get it to advance far enough to avoid overlap.



Sweet, I definitely have to do that. Against my hand and everything xD Yours came out way better. It's such a fun and simple camera.



[02:33:56] <Valkyre> Astro your whole life is ruled by the sentence ' life is better without clothes on'
[22:16:00] <DSomms> it was normal until astro got here
Astro: Patron Saint of Drains
skatchkins location:
The Desert
 
 |  |  | No Stone Unturned Photography
Re: This is the wrong film
<Reply # 5 on 5/21/2015 6:06 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by Astro


Sweet, I definitely have to do that. Against my hand and everything xD Yours came out way better. It's such a fun and simple camera.


Mine Insta may have just been worn down perfectly, but on his, I had to grind this part off to keep the dragger from keeping the shutter from opening if it hadn't tracked with the sprockets (since the 126 has only one sprocket per exposure too).


I ground off the other side too (the sprocket contact) to keep it from pushing the film out of focus or tearing the film on the extra advances.



Flickr Pitchrs
Richard Davies location:
stockport
 
 |  | 
Re: This is the wrong film
<Reply # 6 on 5/21/2015 7:12 PM >
Posted on Forum: Infiltration ForumsQuote
Very interesting pictures.

My parents used to have one of those $5 Instamatics around, not sure what happened to it.

When I last looked they still had their Soviet made FED-4 around.



You're Standing On My Neck
Infiltration Forums > UE Photography > This is the wrong film(Viewed 2527 times)
Reply

Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.

Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 46 ms