|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
NightOpsTech
| | An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras < on 9/14/2006 3:30 AM >
| | | the 2.4Ghz Frequency is used for Channels 1,2,3,4 on Video Surveillance Cameras, you can simply purchase a reciever, and a small LCD Monitor, using Batteries, you can drive around your city, and view ANY security camera on those 4 channels. Also, as a UE, you can purchase a reciever and 4 cameras, placing the cameras at quadrants surrounding the perimeter of your UE site, and your Scanner/Radio/Lookout guy, has eyes in 4 locations, using an external antenna I built, you can view video from 1 mile square!!! Inexpensive, but HIGHLY VALUABLE.
Cumbre Vieja...NYC's Worst enemy...Via Con Dios. |
|
Tek-69
Location: Philly 'burbs Gender: Male
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 1 on 9/14/2006 3:36 AM >
| | | Awesome hi-tech tip, thanks man.
---==Keep-Hope-Alive==--- |
|
dogyeaars
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 2 on 9/14/2006 4:37 AM >
| | | Your posts are very interesting indeed. Please elaborate, how often does this technique work ? (I had been under the impression security cameras were mostly wired) What kind of a receiver is needed ? What kind of buildings use wireless camaras ? [last edit 9/14/2006 4:42 AM by dogyeaars - edited 1 times]
|
|
NightOpsTech
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 3 on 9/14/2006 4:43 AM >
| | | Posted by dogyeaars Your posts are very interesting indeed. Please elaborate, how often does this technique work ? (I had been under the impression security cameras were mostly wired) What kind of a receiver is needed ?
|
This strategy only works when the company has Wireless cameras, however, if they DO have wireless cameras, you can see ANYONE of them with a reciever, you can buy the reciever almost anywhere, usually they come with 1 wireless camera. I have one permanently installed in my truck with a 20db 2.4Ghz Omni-Directional Antenna on the roof, I can view a security camera from inside a building for about 3-4 blocks before I am infront of it (buildings will block the signal, you may have to drive around to the other side of it to view certain cameras
Cumbre Vieja...NYC's Worst enemy...Via Con Dios. |
|
NightOpsTech
| | An eye inside - Jamming a Surveillance Camera Signal <Reply # 4 on 9/14/2006 4:47 AM >
| | | I figured this info would also be helpful, as it may occur that a UE site might have a wireless cameras on the property. First, Buy 4 Wireless video cameras (the small kind with the little wire antenna), set the dip switches on each camera so you have 1 camera on each 4 channels. Black out the lenses with electrical tape, lengthen the small wire antennas, and use 12v batteries instead of the supplied 9v, this will increase the transmitter power in the camera, resulting in a black screen on the target reciever, now no matter where you are in the building, the closest camera to you, will be blacked out WELL before you are in viewing range of the camera! Sweet hunh? [last edit 9/14/2006 4:54 AM by NightOpsTech - edited 1 times]
Cumbre Vieja...NYC's Worst enemy...Via Con Dios. |
|
CaitTheGreat
Location: Westerville/Columbus, OH Gender: Female
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 5 on 9/14/2006 4:11 PM >
| | | Posted by NightOpsTech Sweet hunh?
|
Very!
This city is my jungle gym...Look at this big great world that we live in...There's lots of fun to be had on these streets...We can take a ride, just you and me...It's a jungle gym |
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 6 on 9/14/2006 10:42 PM >
| | | Posted by NightOpsTech I figured this info would also be helpful, as it may occur that a UE site might have a wireless cameras on the property. First, Buy 4 Wireless video cameras (the small kind with the little wire antenna), set the dip switches on each camera so you have 1 camera on each 4 channels. Black out the lenses with electrical tape, lengthen the small wire antennas, and use 12v batteries instead of the supplied 9v, this will increase the transmitter power in the camera, resulting in a black screen on the target reciever, now no matter where you are in the building, the closest camera to you, will be blacked out WELL before you are in viewing range of the camera! Sweet hunh?
|
Sweet until you burn out the regulator with 14V from your freshly charged battery. There is no way to know if your "jammer" is working, and you give away your location, as well as your crystal's digital fingerprint that can be used to ID your transmitter. Most pro security cams are hardwired.
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
NightOpsTech
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 7 on 9/15/2006 12:05 AM >
| | | Posted by blackhawk
Sweet until you burn out the regulator with 14V from your freshly charged battery. There is no way to know if your "jammer" is working, and you give away your location, as well as your crystal's digital fingerprint that can be used to ID your transmitter. Most pro security cams are hardwired.
|
Negative, Soldier. They will not burn out, they accept variable voltage between 9v and 24v. This "Crystals digital fingerprint" thing, that's a whole lot of whooey, because there is no unique signature in the transmitters crystal, the crystal simply allocates the frequency ranges the transmitter works on. Oh, and the "jammer" technique is incredibly effective. I'd bet my vest on it. Actually, I will be bringing a bevy of equipment to a UER meet just as soon as I figure out the 5W's Copy That? [last edit 9/15/2006 12:15 AM by NightOpsTech - edited 4 times]
Cumbre Vieja...NYC's Worst enemy...Via Con Dios. |
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 8 on 9/15/2006 2:13 AM >
| | | Posted by NightOpsTech
Negative, Soldier. They will not burn out, they accept variable voltage between 9v and 24v. This "Crystals digital fingerprint" thing, that's a whole lot of whooey, because there is no unique signature in the transmitters crystal, the crystal simply allocates the frequency ranges the transmitter works on. Oh, and the "jammer" technique is incredibly effective. I'd bet my vest on it. Actually, I will be bringing a bevy of equipment to a UER meet just as soon as I figure out the 5W's Copy That?
|
It's not the cystal per say but rather the digital oscillator; each has it's own unique 'fingerprint", even identical models. This will probably not be discernable from the tapes, but know that it is possible, and this technology is now in use. You also announce your presence if you do override the cam's signal, and again there is no way to know if the "jamming" is working. If the camera has a directional antenna that gives it better gain, or for any other numerous factors you will need a more powerful transmitter to be effective. If they're designed to run between 9-24V, yes. However this does not apply to all circuits depending on there design. You may get away with a higher voltage, but an analog voltage regulator will still pull it down to whatever V+ is suppose to be, and produce more heat as a result of waste-gating the extra voltage. Beyond the technical misgivings to this approach are the practical concerns. I don't think it's a sound idea to tamper with alarm systems, to B&E, etc. Sooner or latter you'll get caught, and with that equipment you will not talk your way out of it. You'll end up with felony convictions for.... exploring?
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
NightOpsTech
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 9 on 9/15/2006 3:37 PM >
| | | Posted by blackhawk
It's not the cystal per say but rather the digital oscillator; each has it's own unique 'fingerprint", even identical models. This will probably not be discernable from the tapes, but know that it is possible, and this technology is now in use. You also announce your presence if you do override the cam's signal, and again there is no way to know if the "jamming" is working. If the camera has a directional antenna that gives it better gain, or for any other numerous factors you will need a more powerful transmitter to be effective. If they're designed to run between 9-24V, yes. However this does not apply to all circuits depending on there design. You may get away with a higher voltage, but an analog voltage regulator will still pull it down to whatever V+ is suppose to be, and produce more heat as a result of waste-gating the extra voltage. Beyond the technical misgivings to this approach are the practical concerns. I don't think it's a sound idea to tamper with alarm systems, to B&E, etc. Sooner or latter you'll get caught, and with that equipment you will not talk your way out of it. You'll end up with felony convictions for.... exploring?
|
Oh well, until you see it for your own eyes you can toss me all the doubt ya want
Cumbre Vieja...NYC's Worst enemy...Via Con Dios. |
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 10 on 9/15/2006 5:31 PM >
| | | It's not that I don't think it could work, but that I feel it's not wise to do, or encourage others to do for a number of reasons. If one was to B&E, and use technics such as this, they would be treated most likey as a professional criminal. People have a right to hold property, and expect security and privacy. By using even primitive jamming technology one will show premeditation, in fact it shows quit a bit of effort to defeat security. In a multilayered system using this technic alone will not be enough; they will most likey be detected. This has now gone from a hobby to a criminal pursuit of felony statue. In addition by using this technic, and by posting it, it causes a premature escalation of technology counter measures that increases the cost to everyone. Better informed users are aware of shortcomings and already use multilayered systems, including dude wireless cameras that may be active but not used. The smaller user, such as the home owner are the ones most hurt, and the laws protecting them are much stiffer. While it is interesting to contemplate, using it will lead to trouble. Bringing tools, especially this type to an active site means one will be treated as what they appear to be when they get caught. eventually one does get caught. Even a traffic stop with items like this will cause trouble. There are many places to explore that are not alarmed, and which one really cares too much about, but are still great fun. They can easily be explored with no tools. Getting tangled up in the legal system with felony charges is time consuming, expensive, a lot of stress, not to mention the permanent damage it can do to you. This kind of excitement with the legal system I will gladly defer to someone other than myself.
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
junkyard
Location: LaCrosse, WI Gender: Male
Strategic Beer Command where the metal hits the meat.
| | | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 11 on 9/15/2006 6:20 PM >
| | | Anyone that uses cheezy wireless cameras isn't spending the money because they don't feel the need to. Anything is better than nothing. Some local guys wandered into a warehouse with several million in inventory and got on camera. They must not have had motion detectors, just cameras because the guys explored the whole place without incident. Unless they're bullshitting, and they don't seem the type. On the tech side, I say it's a good plan. On the practical side, I would shy away from it. There are other sites to explore. Plenty of farm houses do not have cameras of any type.
I drink gasoline for breakfeast and beer for dinner! Any problem can be licked with a case of beer and a few sticks of dynamite. Strategic Beer Command ruling the desert since 1995 http://www.strategic-beer-command.com |
|
DeMiNe0
Location: Brooklyn, NY Gender: Male
DeMiNe0.CoM
| | | | | | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 12 on 9/15/2006 7:44 PM >
| | | Wow, very cool. Do you have a amazon, or other online store link to the receiver?
HtTp://WwW.DeMiNe0.CoM |
|
yokes
Location: Toronto Gender: Male
I aim to misbehave
| | | | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 13 on 9/15/2006 7:57 PM >
| | | I just use the hang a polaroid photo in front of the lens trick. (no, not really)
"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water and stupid men." - Richard Nickel |
|
NightOpsTech
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 14 on 9/15/2006 8:34 PM >
| | | Posted by DeMiNe0 Wow, very cool. Do you have a amazon, or other online store link to the receiver?
|
I can send you whatever you a reciever ify want, they usually come with 1 camera. What country/city are you from? Do you want 1, 2, 3 or 4 Cameras? Do you want a larger Antannae? Let me know! -NOPST [last edit 9/15/2006 8:37 PM by NightOpsTech - edited 2 times]
Cumbre Vieja...NYC's Worst enemy...Via Con Dios. |
|
NightOpsTech
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 15 on 9/15/2006 8:45 PM >
| | | Posted by blackhawk It's not that I don't think it could work, but that I feel it's not wise to do, or encourage others to do for a number of reasons. If one was to B&E, and use technics such as this, they would be treated most likey as a professional criminal.
|
NOTE: I am not a Criminal nor do I endorse Criminal activity, all posts on UER.com by NightOpsTech are for ENTERTAINMENT purposes only. Visitors to UER.com who use infomation posted by NightOpsTech for a criminal purpose are responsible for their own actions. -NightOpsTech
Cumbre Vieja...NYC's Worst enemy...Via Con Dios. |
|
Deuterium
Location: PNW Gender: Male
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 16 on 9/22/2006 6:45 AM >
| | | Posted by NightOpsTech
Negative, Soldier. They will not burn out, they accept variable voltage between 9v and 24v. This "Crystals digital fingerprint" thing, that's a whole lot of whooey, because there is no unique signature in the transmitters crystal, the crystal simply allocates the frequency ranges the transmitter works on. Oh, and the "jammer" technique is incredibly effective. I'd bet my vest on it. Actually, I will be bringing a bevy of equipment to a UER meet just as soon as I figure out the 5W's Copy That?
|
If they accept 9-24v, then the RF transmitter must be made to be FCC compliant under all operating conditions. If you can "jam" other legal devices by running it at higher voltage, then its not in compliance. The device is either illegal or you're talking out of your ass
|
|
T-mac
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada Gender: Male
| | | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 17 on 9/22/2006 11:42 PM >
| | | pretty cool stuff nightops..keep it coming
|
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 18 on 9/23/2006 12:46 AM >
| | | Posted by Deuterium
If they accept 9-24v, then the RF transmitter must be made to be FCC compliant under all operating conditions. If you can "jam" other legal devices by running it at higher voltage, then its not in compliance. The device is either illegal or you're talking out of your ass
|
Your right; to effective jam a receiver you need to have a transmitter that is preferably putting out a LOT more watts (not milliwatts!) then it's mated transmitter. You are right if it puts out more than is permitted for that class of transmitters it would be illegal. This "technic" is a half baked idea.
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
TaP
Location: Montreal, QC Gender: Male
| | Re: An Eye inside - Wireless Video Cameras <Reply # 19 on 9/23/2006 1:55 PM >
| | | Posted by NightOpsTech
NOTE: I am not a Criminal nor do I endorse Criminal activity, all posts on UER.com by NightOpsTech are for ENTERTAINMENT purposes only. Visitors to UER.com who use infomation posted by NightOpsTech for a criminal purpose are responsible for their own actions. -NightOpsTech
|
its uer.ca
|
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 125 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739688588 pages have been generated.
|
|