| Posted by Crossfire |
2/1/2004 4:10 AM | remove |
And, to finish it all off... the ground!!
|
 |
| Posted by Jedstah |
2/2/2004 12:11 AM | remove |
you know you dont have to be such a dick eh. the purpose of taking so many pictures of the ground was to show that many people are still walking around it, but hardly any footprints actually lead into the half demolished building, as well as the shot of the animal prints and the foot prints.
|
|
| Posted by Snarg |
2/29/2004 7:38 PM | remove |
Jedstah, I think the purpose of your pictures would have been more evident had you provided some comments with them.
|
|
| Posted by Jedstah |
3/1/2004 12:37 PM | remove |
that would be true. ill do it with in the next week or so, also will post about the demo of it, and some pictures as well as a picture from the newspaper + caption
|
|
| Posted by The Hitman's Daughter |
11/7/2004 6:04 AM | remove |
*shakes her angry LDB-mod stick at Jedstah* dude you need to enter the descriptions for these photos so that people know why they are looking at fifty pictures of snow.
|
|
| Posted by Jedstah |
11/7/2004 1:18 PM | remove |
as you wish.
|
|
| Posted by The Hitman's Daughter |
11/7/2004 6:15 PM | remove |
awesome :)
|
|
| Posted by Servo |
11/16/2004 4:36 AM | remove |
Or maybe just pick out the best one or two pictures of the snow. Part of being a good photographer is knowing which of the gazillion pictures you took of the same thing to actually let people see.
|
|
| Posted by The Hitman's Daughter |
11/16/2004 7:22 PM | remove |
i agree with servo. it's good to be choosey when it comes to displaying your photos. If you have a whole bunch of pictures of the same thing, pick one or two of the best ones.
|
|
| Posted by Jedstah |
11/16/2004 11:03 PM | remove |
i have over a 100 of this one trip. thats what i did picked the ones that i liked.
|
|
| Posted by Servo |
11/19/2004 9:13 AM | remove |
I regularly take 200+ pictures on a 3-hour UE excursion. I'll pick out maybe 20 to actually publish, and I rarely if ever release two photos of the same thing. Again, you need to learn to boil it down to just what's needed to get your point across.
|
|
| Posted by cloak-and-dagger |
12/10/2007 10:08 PM | remove |
I don't know if all the "snow on the ground" pictures were necessary. But thank you nevertheless for sharing (the other shots).
|
|
| Posted by hunter36 |
6/7/2008 2:22 AM | remove |
#11
|
|
| Posted by hunter36 |
6/7/2008 2:23 AM | remove |
Posted by Jedstah 2/1/2004 9:11 PM | remove
you know you dont have to be such a dick eh. the purpose of taking so many pictures of the ground was to show that many people are still walking around it, but hardly any footprints actually lead into the half demolished building, as well as the shot of the animal prints and the foot prints.
Are you taking pics of your own tracks just to see how many comments will pile up?
|
|
| Posted by maZe |
6/7/2008 3:17 PM | remove |
Hunter, seriously, no need to comment on each pic dear. cause everytime you comment, a location turns blue in my DB and really, it sucks to have to waste all my time reading through useless stuff like "hoo double digit no. 10". If you don't like it, don't look at it, ok? Moving on...
|
|
| Posted by Jedstah |
6/11/2008 3:41 AM | remove |
Actually, Hunter, these pictures were taken nearly 4 years ago before the building was torn down. The pictures that are taken of footprints are from other people, walking around the abandoned building, walking into it.
I don't explore to take pretty pictures, I take pictures to document the building before it was torn down. I've never claimed to be a prize winning photographer. I'm an urban explorer.
The conversation about my pictures and the footprints happened many years ago, when you were just a wee-young-lad.
Just wondering, what have you contributed? We all know I've taken some shitty shots. What about yourself?
|
|
| Posted by maZe |
6/12/2008 1:34 AM | remove |
*high five to Jedstah*
|
