Posted by RailGuy88 |
6/12/2006 11:52 PM | remove |
Sorry to correct you... It's over 200 feet there. It has to be because I own a 20' tower and work with people who own a 100' tower for their radio communications.
|
|
Posted by seany |
6/14/2006 6:23 PM | remove |
american tower #89379 Structure Height (AGL): 65 ft.
Its short enough/old enough to not actually need to be in the FCC DB otherwise i could show you that too.
The perspective is just weird in this picture.
|
|
Posted by RailGuy88 |
6/14/2006 10:18 PM | remove |
I believe you, but it does look to be a bit taller. You a ham or into communications?
|
|
Posted by Rust |
5/12/2007 6:56 PM | remove |
Railguy:You're joking, right? I can tell you right now... That tower is nowhere close to 200 feet tall.
|
|
Posted by seany |
5/13/2007 7:37 AM | remove |
communications
|
|
Posted by Mowog |
12/16/2008 5:44 PM | remove |
>>> Railguy:You're joking, right? I can tell you right now... That tower is nowhere close to 200 feet tall. <<< It's hard to tell... if the base is hidden behind the hill, it could be taller than it looks in this pic.
|
|
Posted by seany |
12/16/2008 6:56 PM | remove |
you can see the top of the fence in the bottom of the picture which is ~ 6 feet tall.
|
|
Posted by Raverous |
4/6/2010 2:13 AM | remove |
Since when do you need to be a ham or radio guy to recognize height?
|