Posted by Axle |
8/3/2005 1:14 PM | remove |
They don't build 'em like this anymore that's for sure.
|
|
Posted by lost |
8/3/2005 1:44 PM | remove |
Nope! Just look at the new Glen O' Dee Hospital - it's a lame approximation of a hospital crammed into generic office-like buildings.
|
|
Posted by greywolf45 |
8/6/2005 4:42 AM | remove |
It just the easiest, and the most convenient way. Nobody give a damn about detail anymore.
|
|
Posted by lost |
8/6/2005 11:21 AM | remove |
True, but they could at least make buildings that don't fall to pieces in 15 years.
|
|
Posted by IIVQ |
8/19/2005 11:23 AM | remove |
Yeah, but people don't make money if their buildings last 100 years. They get fame, but nowadays people care more for money than for fame.
|
|
Posted by maZe |
8/19/2005 11:21 PM | remove |
hummmm if people care more about money then fame, how do you explain this incredible success of reality-TV? They don't make people that much rich (except for a few exceptions like Survivors). Most people do those shows just to see their faces on TV...
|
|
Posted by TurboZutek |
8/19/2005 11:44 PM | remove |
To an extent: some also have aspirations of making it big in TV / Films after having thier face in the media.
I'm told it's not a good route, far easier to shag someone in a position to include you in upcoming productions.
|
|
Posted by IIVQ |
8/26/2005 12:16 PM | remove |
sorry... I shopuld've stated myself clearer. Ppl don't care for long-term fame (after they die). They want it now.
|
|
Posted by SnakeCorp |
8/28/2005 7:17 PM | remove |
I used to have this quote by Henry Newboult in my sig that summed up the 'old' attitude to building things:
"Let us build for the years we shall not see"
..which i think is a lovely idea!
|
|
Posted by IIVQ |
8/28/2005 8:56 PM | remove |
Yep, I think so. What should not happen is that the same architect is allowed to design 2 buildings on the same site (when the first one is demolished after 30 years, double it's expected lifespan, as happened with my old school.)
|
|
Posted by Sleaze |
4/10/2006 3:41 AM | remove |
New buildings/houses suck in my opinion because they have no character. Every nick and scrape has a story to tell. Same goes for cars. My car is 5 years older than I am. And I am not young.
|
|
Posted by lost |
4/10/2006 11:36 AM | remove |
Equally, immaculately restored buildings (and cars) for that matter are dull.
|