forums
new posts
donate
UER Store
events
location db
db map
search
members
faq
terms of service
privacy policy
register
login




UER Forum > Archived Rookie Forum > Remote Release (Viewed 320 times)
Sceptic 


Location: In the Dreams of a City that Never Sleeps
Gender: Male


120

Send Private Message | Send Email
Remote Release
< on 7/29/2010 10:22 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
So I've read up a little on the choices and realize that I have four.

1.Wired, or Cable Shutter Release.
2.Wireless Infrared (IR) Shutter Release.
3.Wireless Radio Frequency (RF) Shutter Release.
4.Remote Timer Switch.

I am shooting with a Canon t1i and am considering purchasing the Wireless Infrared shutter release to shoot long bulb exposures.

I was wondering what other people use, and if anyone had any suggestions or feedback for me, thanks!

p.s. ( these are some of my possible choices...
1.Canon Wireless IR Remote Control RC-1
2.Canon Wireless Remote Controller RC-5
3.Opteka RC-4 Wireless Remote Control

"Instinctive forces influence the activity of consciousness. Whether that influence is for better or for worse depends upon the actual contents of the unconscious."
RenegadeOfFunk 


Location: Boston, MA
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | AIM Message
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 1 on 7/29/2010 10:30 PM >
Posted on Forum: Infiltration Forums
 
I have no experience with any of the above releases. However I would recommend going and searching eBay for the $10 chinese knockoffs. I'm pretty sure that is what most people do since they don't want to pay $50+ for the Canon or Nikon ones that will do the same.

rob.i.am 


Gender: Male


Carpe noctum

Send Private Message | Send Email | flickr
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 2 on 7/29/2010 10:32 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Mobile
 
http://www.dealext...etails.dx/sku.5577

$3.50 with free delivery.

I have a couple of the DX remotes for my Nikon D90 and they work as well as the genuine Nikon one I own.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rob666/
PositivePressure 


Location: High and low where most don't go
Gender: Male


Set your Tesla coil to broil

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 3 on 7/29/2010 10:48 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Your choice of shutter release is sometimes dependent on what you're primarily shooting. Keep in mind that with most wireless releases, there is no "lock" function.

This means that if you're into doing really long exposures, you're going to be either limited to 30 seconds (or whatever your camera's max manual exposure is), or you're going to be sitting in close vicinity to the camera and holding down the button on your remote for the entire exposure while in Bulb mode - which sucks. Having to hold down the button the whole time while atop a 40 storey building in the middle of winter is not fun!

If you're doing long exposures, I'd probably sacrifice the physical convenience of wireless and I'd go with a cabled remote instead, as most cabled remotes have a lock feature so you can set and just leave the camera while it exposes for as long as you want.

Otherwise, the range on most of the IR remotes isn't more than 10 feet or so. If you want a good wireless system, RF is the way to go as some of the better systems have a range of up to 1600 feet or so, and can be fired through obstacles.

Hope this helps!

Sceptic 


Location: In the Dreams of a City that Never Sleeps
Gender: Male


120

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 4 on 7/29/2010 11:09 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by PositivePressure

If you're doing long exposures, I'd probably sacrifice the physical convenience of wireless and I'd go with a cabled remote instead, as most cabled remotes have a lock feature so you can set and just leave the camera while it exposes for as long as you want.

Otherwise, the range on most of the IR remotes isn't more than 10 feet or so. If you want a good wireless system, RF is the way to go as some of the better systems have a range of up to 1600 feet or so, and can be fired through obstacles.

Hope this helps!


Thanks! can an RF remote be triggered by any other frequncies by mistake?

"Instinctive forces influence the activity of consciousness. Whether that influence is for better or for worse depends upon the actual contents of the unconscious."
\/adder 


Location: DunkarooLand
Gender: Male


I'm the worst of the best but I'm in this race.

Send Private Message | Send Email | 
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 5 on 7/29/2010 11:20 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I have this one
http://opteka.com/...talslrcameras.aspx

it works well and if you hold down the button for 6" it will lock the shutter open in bulb mode you can hit the button again to close.

Radio based are better than infrared based timers.

But I want to buy this one:
http://www.satechi...CH2MO&cat=CAM&sub=

because I want to be able to dial in shutter speed instead of having to open the shutter and time it with the clock on my phone.

You could have the best of both worlds:
http://www.bhphoto..._T_Pro_2_4GHz.html

wireless shutter release + dial in settings.

"No risk, no reward, no fun."
"Go all the way or walk away"
escensi omnis...
PositivePressure 


Location: High and low where most don't go
Gender: Male


Set your Tesla coil to broil

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 6 on 7/29/2010 11:25 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Sceptic


Thanks! can an RF remote be triggered by any other frequncies by mistake?


Not generally. But I imagine the cheaper they get, the more prone they are to be affected by that type of thing. I've never had any issues though with interference, whether using the really cheap ones or the high end stuff.

rob.i.am 


Gender: Male


Carpe noctum

Send Private Message | Send Email | flickr
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 7 on 7/29/2010 11:28 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Mobile
 
For long exposures in bulb mode on my D90 I click once to open the shutter and click again to close it.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rob666/
\/adder 


Location: DunkarooLand
Gender: Male


I'm the worst of the best but I'm in this race.

Send Private Message | Send Email | 
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 8 on 7/29/2010 11:30 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by PositivePressure
Your choice of shutter release is sometimes dependent on what you're primarily shooting. Keep in mind that with most wireless releases, there is no "lock" function.

This means that if you're into doing really long exposures, you're going to be either limited to 30 seconds (or whatever your camera's max manual exposure is), or you're going to be sitting in close vicinity to the camera and holding down the button on your remote for the entire exposure while in Bulb mode - which sucks. Having to hold down the button the whole time while atop a 40 storey building in the middle of winter is not fun!




The opeteka wireless I linked has a lock function built in ... hold the button down for 6" and it locks the shutter open. As the battery drained I found I the signal got weaker and I had to be right next to the camera to actuate it. One fresh [$5] battery later and I was good to go again.

Posted by PositivePressure


Not generally. But I imagine the cheaper they get, the more prone they are to be affected by that type of thing. I've never had any issues though with interference, whether using the really cheap ones or the high end stuff.


Not with a strong battery. If you leave it on in your bag and the battery drains, it can be interupted.

I've used mine near cell transmitters without problem and that's the strongest RF one can probably come across.

"No risk, no reward, no fun."
"Go all the way or walk away"
escensi omnis...
metawaffle 

King of Puns


Location: Brisbane!
Gender: Male


Purveyor of Fine Lampshades

Send Private Message | Send Email | longexposure.net
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 9 on 7/29/2010 11:35 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Sceptic


Thanks! can an RF remote be triggered by any other frequncies by mistake?


If you're shooting with other people who are also using RF remotes, you might run into issues where you trigger each others' cameras - the units support multiple channels, but their implementations are such that the channels can overlap, somewhat.

http://www.longexposure.net
Intrinsic 


Location: Collingwood
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 10 on 7/30/2010 2:22 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I paid about $20 for a Canon Wireless IR Remote Control RC-1. It works well except in outdoor situations where it is sunny out, it can be hit and miss to get it to work on the first try.

It also has a two second optional delay built into it.



Spike 


Location: New Zealand
Gender: Male


Rapid Canvas Therapy

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 11 on 7/30/2010 2:34 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Intrinsic
I paid about $20 for a Canon Wireless IR Remote Control RC-1. It works well except in outdoor situations where it is sunny out, it can be hit and miss to get it to work on the first try.

It also has a two second optional delay built into it.




I have a similar one for my Nikon, ir as well, gets about ten metres range, has the option to lock the shutter open with a slidey switch that you just turn off when you want the shutter to close! works great for those 5 minute exposures!

nosus decipio
NotBatman 


Location: MSP
Gender: Male


Secret Cult Member

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 12 on 7/30/2010 3:02 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by TheVicariousVadder
I have this one
http://opteka.com/...talslrcameras.aspx

it works well and if you hold down the button for 6" it will lock the shutter open in bulb mode you can hit the button again to close.


Seconded.

I have the same remote, never had a problem.

I love it to pieces.



I'm a "Leave only footprints, take only pornography" kind of guy, myself.
\/adder 


Location: DunkarooLand
Gender: Male


I'm the worst of the best but I'm in this race.

Send Private Message | Send Email | 
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 13 on 7/30/2010 5:52 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by NotBatman


Seconded.

I have the same remote, never had a problem.

I love it to pieces.




I just bought

a chinese knockoff "Shoot! LCD Timer with RS-60E3 cord" from ebay this seller http://myworld.ebay.com/eshopic/

19.95 free shipping (from NJ apparently)

(edit realized the link would die when the listing ends in four days)
[last edit 7/30/2010 5:56 AM by \/adder - edited 1 times]

"No risk, no reward, no fun."
"Go all the way or walk away"
escensi omnis...
Steed 


Location: Edmonton/Seoul
Gender: Male


Your Friendly Neighbourhood Race Traitor

Send Private Message | Send Email | Daehanmindecline
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 14 on 7/30/2010 8:09 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by metawaffle


If you're shooting with other people who are also using RF remotes, you might run into issues where you trigger each others' cameras - the units support multiple channels, but their implementations are such that the channels can overlap, somewhat.


Good times.


Sceptic 


Location: In the Dreams of a City that Never Sleeps
Gender: Male


120

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Remote Release
<Reply # 15 on 8/1/2010 4:15 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Thanks everyone! I think I've made my choice =D

"Instinctive forces influence the activity of consciousness. Whether that influence is for better or for worse depends upon the actual contents of the unconscious."
UER Forum > Archived Rookie Forum > Remote Release (Viewed 320 times)



All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site: UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service | View Privacy Policy | Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 78 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739479267 pages have been generated.