|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
813 online
Server Time:
2024-04-19 05:23:29
|
|
|
josh_truant
Location: MA Gender: Male
| | | Something went wrong. < on 3/3/2009 6:03 PM >
| | | When I originally composed this shot, I was really happy. The view and framing and everything was great to me, at the time. Now that I see the end-result, though, I don't know what went wrong. The roof seems grainy, the outside area seems over-exposed while the inside seems underexposed. What was the most carefully taken shot as well as the shot I most looked forward to seeing developed was a disappointment. Critique it please, I want to understand what exactly failed.
|
|
telefontubbie
Location: Latvia, Riga Gender: Female
"No Trespassing" - It's an invitation!
| | Re: Something went wrong. <Reply # 1 on 3/3/2009 6:09 PM >
| | | Maybe too much noise in picture? Perhaps it could be better if you took it from lighter place. Just guessing. [last edit 3/3/2009 6:11 PM by telefontubbie - edited 1 times]
|
|
yokes
Location: Toronto Gender: Male
I aim to misbehave
| | | | Re: Something went wrong. <Reply # 2 on 3/3/2009 6:20 PM >
| | | Metering a shot like this would have been impossible to get it all exposed as your eye sees it. Film (or digital) does not have the dynamic range needed to expose both the foreground inside and the background outside... so you have to pick which area you want to expose for, and accept that the rest won't be how you want. If your camera did the metering, it was looking generally in the center of the frame and taking its exposure reading accordingly... which is why the shaded areas of the trees outside are correctly exposed. Basically, you have to decide ahead of time if preserving the highlight details (i.e. the blown out areas outside) or the shadow details (i.e. the inside underexposed areas) at the expense of the other is what you'd like to do. What you can also do is take 2 frames.. one exposing for the highlights and one exposing for the shadows, and then manually blend them together into a single image in, say, photoshop.
"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water and stupid men." - Richard Nickel |
|
craigfinlay
Location: Macomb, Illinois Gender: Male
So long, Paul.
| | | Re: Something went wrong. <Reply # 3 on 3/3/2009 6:54 PM >
| | | Yeah, the light at the end of that hallway is so much more intense than the light inside the hallway, that you can't get a single shot balance. If you meter for the interior, then the end will blow out. If you meter for the end, then there won't be enough light in the hallway and it will be too dark. When you're seeing this with your naked eye, the same thing is happening; you just don't notice it. As for the grain, depends on the camera, ISO, etc. Yokes is right in that the only way to get an even exposure all around is a series of progressively more exposed shots which you can then combine. If you've never done HDR go on flickr and just search; you'll come up with thousands.
Things I will do for love: Anything. Things I will not do for love: That. |
|
TCdrainer
Location: ur moms house Gender: Male
| | Re: Something went wrong. <Reply # 4 on 3/4/2009 1:31 AM >
| | | Not exactly what you were going for more than likely, but I think a shot from further up (toward the outside) with the pine trees as your main subject, but still inside enough to see the outline of the building would be neat. At least IMO. Don't really know what to say about the technical stuff. I'm more of a straight 'explorer" than photographer. [last edit 3/4/2009 1:33 AM by TCdrainer - edited 1 times]
"Reality is an illusion created by a lack of alcohol." |
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 78 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 738470460 pages have been generated.
|
|