forums
new posts
donate
UER Store
events
location db
db map
search
members
faq
terms of service
privacy policy
register
login




UER Forum > Archived UE Photo Critiques > re-edits (Viewed 325 times)
Alias 


Location: UK
Gender: Male


www.nicholas-ada ms.co.uk

Send Private Message | Send Email | nicholas-adams.co.uk
re-edits
< on 3/11/2008 8:54 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
two from ages ago I found and thought I would try editing them again.

what do people think?

1

2


Alias

www.nicholas-adams.co.uk
quinwound 


Location: Rochester




Send Private Message | Send Email | AIM Message
Re: re-edits
<Reply # 1 on 3/11/2008 9:47 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I think that the second one is a stronger composition, and a more interesting subject matter.

Both of you photographs has the very clear vanishing point in the center of your picture. This has the effect of a black hole in your photographs because these lines to the center send your viewers eye directly to the center of the photograph skipping over the main part of your photo that is shaped like a donut around the center of the black hole.

I think you are on the right track though. Good photographs. The next time you go out shooting consider placing something so you don't have converging lines that lead to nowhere, or the center of your photo. Block them by trying different angles, props, etc...


metawaffle 

King of Puns


Location: Brisbane!
Gender: Male


Purveyor of Fine Lampshades

Send Private Message | Send Email | longexposure.net
Re: re-edits
<Reply # 2 on 3/11/2008 9:51 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
The first looks good - hooray!

The second looks horrible - sorry.



http://www.longexposure.net
aikefu 


Location: SW Ohio
Gender: Male


Yes.

Send Private Message | Send Email | Ron Paul 2008 -- Save the Republic
Re: re-edits
<Reply # 3 on 3/11/2008 6:59 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
The second one is composed better, but it also tilts CCW very noticeably. They're also a little too dark, and you have to strain your eyes a bit to look at them, particularly 02.

They're still excellent pictures though.

You are now breathing manually.
Martino 


Location: Almere - NL
Gender: Male


2,5 days 5691 km, 1200 cigarettes, 131 beers, 67 locations, 3 girs and 2 cars! I absolutely rule!

Send Private Message | Send Email | martino
Re: re-edits
<Reply # 4 on 3/12/2008 11:29 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
both good shots, but to much saturation for me

http://www.flickr.com/photos/martino_
cambrianguy 






Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: re-edits
<Reply # 5 on 3/14/2008 3:02 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
The first one is nice... good sense of height and scale. The second one, however, is not so good. I don't care much for this crop on it and the saturation is a bit overdone. It's also crooked and not level.

Air 


Location: Canada




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: re-edits
<Reply # 6 on 3/14/2008 7:21 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
First one, like the angle, although I usually hate HDR it lends itself well to that crusty grimy environment. Its a keeper.

Second shot, I don't like it all. It looks like a pano on angle, lots of distracting elements in the photo, and the HDR is way to overdone.

Hope that helps!



"The extraordinary beauty of things that fail." - Heinrich von Kleist
Alias 


Location: UK
Gender: Male


www.nicholas-ada ms.co.uk

Send Private Message | Send Email | nicholas-adams.co.uk
Re: re-edits
<Reply # 7 on 3/15/2008 10:05 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I agree with everyone now that second shot is awful

www.nicholas-adams.co.uk
nohbdy 


Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: re-edits
<Reply # 8 on 3/16/2008 12:54 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
i love the 2nd one, i want to have sex with it, no im not joking

UER Forum > Archived UE Photo Critiques > re-edits (Viewed 325 times)



All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site: UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service | View Privacy Policy | Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 171 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741760405 pages have been generated.