 |
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
728 online
Server Time:
2024-04-19 11:44:52
|
|
|
 Explorer H
       
Obla-di-obla-doberator
Location: Around the corner from the Turkey Hill
Gender: Male
I just want some slack.
 |  |  | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 1 on 1/15/2007 10:51 PM >
|  | | | I realy like ’em. Number four has something creepy going on in the lower right window near your mark.
Who says rainy days are not picture makin' days!
[last edit 1/15/2007 10:52 PM by Explorer H - edited 1 times]
http://doublehmedia.com http://hartmancommercialphoto.com |
|
Glass
  
Location: Chicago
as one does
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 2 on 1/15/2007 11:17 PM >
| | | | Bad bokeh... but I like the compositions and the idea.
What kind of lens, may I ask?
|
|
heinrick
Location: Cascadia
Gender: Male
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 3 on 1/15/2007 11:50 PM >
| | | | 3 and 7 are your strongest. The others aren't nearly as visually interesting, but they're still good in every other respect.
Depth of field with film cameras has a great look that just can't be replicated any other way.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/heinrick05/ |
|
femaledragonx
Location: Detroit & Everywhere Else I can dream up to go to
The singularity is near
| | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 4 on 1/15/2007 11:58 PM >
| | | | i sure like 1 and 7.
"Collective fear stimulates herd instinct, and tends to produce ferocity toward those who are not regarded as members of the herd." -Bertrand Russell
"How we spend our days is, of course, how we spend our lives." ~Annie Dillard |
|
IrIsHmOm
Location: San Joaquin Valley, CA
Gender: Female
I'll kill your face...
| |  | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 5 on 1/16/2007 12:21 AM >
| | | | These have a really creepy feel to 'em.. I like!!
|
|
Air
Location: Canada
| | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 6 on 1/16/2007 1:17 AM >
| | | | I really like 6, it gives the place a lonely forgotten feel.
"The extraordinary beauty of things that fail." - Heinrich von Kleist |
|
The Riddlers
Location: Oxted, UK
Gender: Male
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 7 on 1/16/2007 11:45 AM >
| | | | They aint even real pictures m8
I'm the Daddy |
|
Tunnellad.
Location: U.K
Gender: Male
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 10 on 1/16/2007 9:25 PM >
| | | | Posted by The Riddlers
They aint even real pictures m8
|
What are you going on about Riddlers?? they are very decent pictures imo.
|
|
Commissar
Location: Boise, ID
Gender: Male
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 11 on 1/17/2007 3:29 AM >
| | | | The only thing I really saw that looked off was some of the unfocused twigs and whatnot. Stuff like that can look really good, just make sure they don’t obscure too much of your subject.
We can't stop here, this is bat country |
|
Captain Hook
Location: philadelphia
Gender: Male
| | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 12 on 1/18/2007 12:33 AM >
| | | | wow this place looks sooo awsome. Your pictures are really great from this location the first couple are really great i like the vegitation growing up the side of the house. You definatly used an overcast day to your advantage.
avast ye matties there is a squall aloof. Brace the jib and batten down the hatches! yarrrrr!!! |
|
stoop_master
Location: south uk
Gender: Male
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 13 on 1/29/2007 1:44 PM >
| | | | Posted by Glass
Bad bokeh... but I like the compositions and the idea.
What kind of lens, may I ask?
|
sorry to bring this thread back up, but a few people have mentioned my pics have bad bokeh!
There are lots of different bokeh looks but what is considered bad and why????
It's just the shape of the iris that effects the bokeh look!
st00p
www.sub-urban.com www.st00p.net |
|
cedew
| | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 14 on 1/29/2007 7:16 PM >
| | | | If someone says "bad bokeh", it just means that they think you chose the wrong subject in focus. Just remember that your attention is drawn to what is in focus, and ask yourself, if that is what you want to see? This is not a 100% rule in photography, as everyone knows rule #1 in photography is:
Break the rules!
[last edit 1/29/2007 7:17 PM by cedew - edited 1 times]
|
|
Air
Location: Canada
| | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 15 on 1/31/2007 8:58 PM >
| | | | Posted by stoop_master
sorry to bring this thread back up, but a few people have mentioned my pics have bad bokeh!
There are lots of different bokeh looks but what is considered bad and why????
It's just the shape of the iris that effects the bokeh look!
st00p
|
I guess its all a matter of opinion and highly subjective. Its better (I think ) to focus on something small like a detail when working on DoF shots. But feel free to experiment and see what works for u. I dont get much DoF with my 20mm, so your lens could limit you.
"The extraordinary beauty of things that fail." - Heinrich von Kleist |
|
stoop_master
Location: south uk
Gender: Male
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 16 on 1/31/2007 10:05 PM >
| | | | You can get a small DOF with a wide angle lens as long as you focus on something very near. I don't know how people can say "bad bokeh", I think that's a pretty gay comment! LOL
www.sub-urban.com www.st00p.net |
|
Glass
Location: Chicago
as one does
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 17 on 2/1/2007 1:58 AM >
| | | | Posted by cedew
If someone says "bad bokeh", it just means that they think you chose the wrong
|
Uh, no. Google it.
[last edit 2/1/2007 1:58 AM by Glass - edited 2 times]
|
|
Glass
Location: Chicago
as one does
| | | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 18 on 2/1/2007 1:59 AM >
| | | | Posted by stoop_master
I think that's a pretty gay comment! LOL
|
I didn't know people still said 'X was soooo gay LOL'. But I was wrong.
|
|
kowalski
| | Re: Beedingwood
<Reply # 19 on 2/1/2007 3:15 AM >
| | | | Layman's explanation: If someone says you have "bad bokeh," it means that the out-of-focus stuff in the background of your image clashes, distracts or otherwise detracts from the stuff that is in focus. It doesn't mean that the wrong thing is in focus, it means that the way the out of focus stuff is out of focus is ugly. This could be because of the construction of your lens (various lenses are considered to have superior or inferior bokeh) or because you didn't choose a good depth of field, angle, or lighting for your composition. You might have gone back there another day, with different daylight, and gotten a much improved (or worsened) result. It's often very subjective, but if you want to know more about this shit, please follow the advice above and google.
You can choose to ignore the "bad bokeh" commenters (I seem to recall there being a few haters for the bokeh in this photo, but I'll always love the way it looks), but they do often have a point. If most of your photo is out of focus, it had better look good that way, and unfortunately in a number of the photos you've included above, it doesn't. The viewer's eye should be drawn into the area that is well-focused, and that's not happening in your branch and plant exteriors. Near-side unfocusedness is especially tough to make work, and it's a detriment to two of those shots.
But otherwise, you get nice atmosphere out of your films, and the sixth shot, the interior with what looks to be a blackberry bramble growing up out of it, is quite nice (though it would helped by some judicious cropping).
|
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 125 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 738496074 pages have been generated.
|
|
