|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
627 online
Server Time:
2024-05-09 21:09:08
|
|
|
tron_2.0
Location: Ohio Gender: Male
| | | | Re: First time - some Buffalo Central Terminal shots... <Reply # 1 on 11/24/2006 10:26 PM >
| | | whoaaaa fisheye doood the only imput i would put in is that the first one probably would look a million times cooler at the front of the station.
[quote][i]Posted by yokes[/i] I find your lack of coziness.... disturbing. [/quote] |
|
TrixieSparrow
Location: Hamilton, ON Gender: Female
I guess.
| | Re: First time - some Buffalo Central Terminal shots... <Reply # 2 on 11/30/2006 1:24 AM >
| | | You went wrong because you brought aids to your exam. You smell.
|
|
hedd
Location: Ottawa, ON, CA Gender: Male
| | | Re: First time - some Buffalo Central Terminal shots... <Reply # 3 on 12/1/2006 9:02 PM >
| | | #1 is a bit of a lost cause because a) it's blurring and b) it wouldn't be that exciting anyways. Don't like the fisheye either. #2 is pretty decent.. I would have taken it portrait-oriented instead, and it's still got some weird blurring issues around the peripheral (intentional or no?) but it's got potential. #3 is not bad either, although the dark shadow in the centre is distracting... Photoshop that puppy! #4 I don't like at all.
- BG |
|
yokes
Location: Toronto Gender: Male
I aim to misbehave
| | | | Re: First time - some Buffalo Central Terminal shots... <Reply # 4 on 12/1/2006 9:20 PM >
| | | Generally speaking, I'm not a fan of the fish eye. That aside: #1: Your horizon isn't level. I like the contrasty image, though. #2: What's that white speck at the top? The corner blurs are a function of the lens, and not much you can do about that (a reason to use another lens). A different lens, this would be a good photo. #3: Only complaint is the corner softness from the lens. Otherwise it is a cool shot. #4: Undecided. Its "flaws" appear intentional in the post-processing, so they aren't flaws. I'm leaning towards "like it".
"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water and stupid men." - Richard Nickel |
|
Air
Location: Canada
| | Re: First time - some Buffalo Central Terminal shots... <Reply # 5 on 12/4/2006 5:23 AM >
| | |
I like these two, the fisheye is terrible to use head on with a building, but I understand that you might not have something else, or may like to experiment. Keep trying everything until u find what you like.
[last edit 12/4/2006 5:24 AM by Air - edited 1 times]
"The extraordinary beauty of things that fail." - Heinrich von Kleist |
|
Jannx
Location: on Location Gender: Male
stay low
| | Re: First time - some Buffalo Central Terminal shots... <Reply # 6 on 12/4/2006 5:30 AM >
| | | 1... I think you have a definite 'focus issue' check your af or check for a diopter for your viewfinder. 2,3 .. are okay, however maybe a little on the underexposed side.. 4.. its a personal thing, to me this looks more like a magazine cover than a photograph
ue.. it ain't what it usta be... |
|
Jono
civilly disobedient.
| | | Re: First time - some Buffalo Central Terminal shots... <Reply # 7 on 12/4/2006 7:28 PM >
| | | Thanks, guys! Allow me to explain the fisheye issue: I shoot with a Canon 300D digital rebel, but the fisheye is one of those off-ebay bayonette-mount cheap ones, just for effects...the silly lens reduces the quality of shot to the camera my cell phone has.
Jono.
www.sacramentalperception.com : www.jonathancastellino.com |
|
Hi/Po
Location: Earth Gender: Male
| | Re: First time - some Buffalo Central Terminal shots... <Reply # 8 on 12/4/2006 9:18 PM >
| | | The effect is really weak. More sharpness, less contrast! [last edit 12/4/2006 9:18 PM by Hi/Po - edited 1 times]
|
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 117 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741173340 pages have been generated.
|
|