 |
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
669 online
Server Time:
2024-05-13 15:21:17
|
|
|
 ChuckyShamrok
 
Location: Boston MASS
Gender: Male
I'm Awesome; But I suck.
 |  | Metro State in the rain FIXED!
< on 5/24/2006 6:03 AM >
|  | | | I put these in the wrong forum by accident. Any Critcism would be awesome.
1
2
3
4
Shot With: Canon Rebel T2 W/ 90-28mm lense. Kodak 200spd film
Just a nostalgic old man now... |
|
imprezawrxsti
   
Location: Portland, OR
Gender: Male
nothing is true; everything is permitted
| |  | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 1 on 5/26/2006 10:23 PM >
| | | | haha, i thought this thread was going to be about my school.
nice stuff though. i like the textures.
do you know how to waltz? |
|
lasthourstand
Location: Syracuse, NY
Gender: Male
You've got head pigeons!
| |  | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 2 on 5/28/2006 1:42 PM >
| | | | #1 looks underexposed, while 2 and 4 are a little overexposed. Number three is a little soft, but nice use of lighting. If you're looking a high quality film, I'd recommend FujiFilm Superia 200ISO or FujiFilm Professional Press 400ISO. Both really nice films.
[last edit 5/28/2006 1:43 PM by lasthourstand - edited 1 times]
Today is your way out... |
|
Psychosurgeon
Location: Long Island
Gender: Male
| | | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 3 on 5/28/2006 2:17 PM >
| | | | 2 and 4 are the same picture
I like the secret urban exploration ninja mafia better |
|
Andy "Not Dice" Dice
Location: We can live in dumpsters if we have to, MA
Gender: Male
UE'ing is for pussies, bro.
| | | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 4 on 5/29/2006 12:27 AM >
| | | | Posted by lasthourstand
#1 looks underexposed, while 2 and 4 are a little overexposed. Number three is a little soft, but nice use of lighting. If you're looking a high quality film, I'd recommend FujiFilm Superia 200ISO or FujiFilm Professional Press 400ISO. Both really nice films.
|
Not to be a vocab nazi but I think you've gotcher "under" and "over" mixed up.
--- 456.photo.to --- |
|
Majickal
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Gender: Male
<3 Home Depot
| | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 5 on 5/29/2006 1:43 AM >
| | | | | Not to be a vocab nazi but I think you've gotcher "under" and "over" mixed up. |
LOL Nazi's. I like 2/4. Good work. What are you shooting these with?
This is the sig |
|
Majickal
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Gender: Male
<3 Home Depot
| | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 6 on 5/29/2006 1:44 AM >
| | | | | Shot With: Canon Rebel T2 W/ 90-28mm lense. Kodak 200spd film |
Lawlz my bad.
This is the sig |
|
lasthourstand
Location: Syracuse, NY
Gender: Male
You've got head pigeons!
| | | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 7 on 5/31/2006 3:06 AM >
| | | | Posted by Andy "Not Dice" Dice
Not to be a vocab nazi but I think you've gotcher "under" and "over" mixed up.
|
Nope, Number 1 is a smidge under-exposed, there's not enough detail in the highlights. While 2 and 4 are the same picture and both are over-exposed, not enough detail in the shadows. I'm talking about the print quality. Number 1 would have an over-exposed negative and thus an under-exposed print. Either that or the exposure time on the print wasn't long enough. Either way, I'd burn that whole left side of the print on number 1.
Today is your way out... |
|
JonnyVpa
Location: Atlanta, GA and Scranton, PA (Hometown)
Gender: Male
ROTTEN FUCK!!!
| |  | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 8 on 6/1/2006 6:22 PM >
| | | | sniff sniff.... i think i smell sulfur.... there may be a flamewar inhere ????
If I had a Rocket Launcher, some son of a bitch will die - Bruce Cockburn |
|
lexiphoto
Location: Denver, Colorado
Gender: Female
UE Den Mother
| |  | | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 9 on 6/1/2006 6:25 PM >
| | | | Posted by lasthourstand
Nope, Number 1 is a smidge under-exposed, there's not enough detail in the highlights. While 2 and 4 are the same picture and both are over-exposed, not enough detail in the shadows. I'm talking about the print quality. Number 1 would have an over-exposed negative and thus an under-exposed print. Either that or the exposure time on the print wasn't long enough. Either way, I'd burn that whole left side of the print on number 1.
|
No number 1 is way over exposed. If it was a stop or two under you could pull out those details in the highlights. This you can't save the highlights at all
Nothing Satisfies Like Beef! |
|
ryan
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Providence RI
Gender: Male
F/gayz
| | | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 10 on 6/1/2006 7:09 PM >
| | | | i still need to go there... double-you tee eff
I climb stuff!
Remember! Shop smart. Shop S-Mart \http://www.myspace.com/xitstheendx |
|
lasthourstand
Location: Syracuse, NY
Gender: Male
You've got head pigeons!
| | | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 11 on 6/2/2006 1:19 AM >
| | | | Posted by lexiphoto
No number 1 is way over exposed. If it was a stop or two under you could pull out those details in the highlights. This you can't save the highlights at all
|
I'm not starting a flame war, they're stupid.
I'd agree that the negative could be overexposed, meaning it's too thick in the highlight areas (it received too much light during the initial exposure of the film) so you're losing detail in the highlights.
But as far as the print is concerned (allowing that we had a perfect negative), this final print is underexposed (meaning there's not enough detail in the highlights).
You had me doubting myself, but I checked with several photographer friends and we were all in agreement that it's under, not over.
Today is your way out... |
|
lexiphoto
Location: Denver, Colorado
Gender: Female
UE Den Mother
| | | | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 12 on 6/2/2006 3:36 PM >
| | | | Posted by lasthourstand
I'm not starting a flame war, they're stupid.
I'd agree that the negative could be overexposed, meaning it's too thick in the highlight areas (it received too much light during the initial exposure of the film) so you're losing detail in the highlights.
But as far as the print is concerned (allowing that we had a perfect negative), this final print is underexposed (meaning there's not enough detail in the highlights).
You had me doubting myself, but I checked with several photographer friends and we were all in agreement that it's under, not over.
|
Um, I don't know. That's not what I was taught during my bachelors degree in photography. But I could be wrong. The scan may just be bad any way.
Nothing Satisfies Like Beef! |
|
Andy "Not Dice" Dice
Location: We can live in dumpsters if we have to, MA
Gender: Male
UE'ing is for pussies, bro.
| | | | Re: Metro State in the rain FIXED!
<Reply # 13 on 6/2/2006 11:09 PM >
| | | | Hahahaha oh I get it! You thought he was printing his own photos. In that case, you're both right, the both of you who were wrong. But you're both wrong, because these photos were all printed by an invariable exposure time at a local drug store. But I guess y'all didn't know that.
I didn't mean to start a flamewar by pointing this out, but then it came to name calling and that's just wrong. Just plain wrong.
If we're talking photographic technique, not printing technique, yah. Lexiphoto is right. But, on a CONSTRUCTIVE note! I thought about photo number one? And When I thought about it, I thought about how neet this picture is, only because of how dark it was in that room when he took the photo. This picture made me completely forget about what the weather conditions were like that day (despite the puddles on the floor). Sometimes it's fun to do that with wicked long exposures. It was cloudy and drizzly and GROSS and dismal in that room. I want there to be a dude wearing really dark clothes standing against the wicked bright wall.
--- 456.photo.to --- |
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 156 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741573899 pages have been generated.
|
|
