 |
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
762 online
Server Time:
2024-04-19 07:00:50
|
|
|
 mada
  
Noble Donor
Location: Orange County, California
Gender: Male
23437
 |  |  |  |  | Vertical is good
< on 4/2/2006 8:49 PM >
|  | | |
The following sentence is false. The preceding sentence is true.
|
|
Glass
     
Location: Chicago
as one does
| | | Re: Vertical is good
<Reply # 1 on 4/2/2006 11:01 PM >
| | | | I like the style, but it's kind of cliche.
|
|
JayP
Location: Montreal
Gender: Male
| | Re: Vertical is good
<Reply # 2 on 4/3/2006 12:33 AM >
| | | | i love black and white with ue but 1&2 dont quite do it for me, however 3 is really good in spite of colour
|
|
lasthourstand
Location: Syracuse, NY
Gender: Male
You've got head pigeons!
| | | | Re: Vertical is good
<Reply # 3 on 4/3/2006 1:20 AM >
| | | | What did you shoot number 3 with that gave you the vignetting?
Today is your way out... |
|
mada
Noble Donor
Location: Orange County, California
Gender: Male
23437
| | | | | Re: Vertical is good
<Reply # 4 on 4/3/2006 4:39 AM >
| | | | Posted by mynameisglass
I like the style, but it's kind of cliche.
|
Are you referring to the style or the subject matter as cliche?
Posted by lasthourstand
What did you shoot number 3 with that gave you the vignetting?
|
That's from the two filters I had on my lense while it was zoomed all the way out.
The following sentence is false. The preceding sentence is true.
|
|
Glass
Location: Chicago
as one does
| | | Re: Vertical is good
<Reply # 5 on 4/3/2006 4:45 AM >
| | | | Posted by mada
Are you referring to the style or the subject matter as cliche?
|
Both, really.
Glass
|
|
Glass
Location: Chicago
as one does
| | | Re: Vertical is good
<Reply # 6 on 4/3/2006 5:35 AM >
| | | | More in-depth critique.
1)
I like the long depth of field and the grain... tone is pretty nice and suggests you're using film (I don't think your post tells either way). What I don't like is the balance leaves the weight of the building very rooted to the lower right, and it pulls the eye away from the intersecting verticals that I think you were shooting at. As I mentioned before, this is a photo template that's been used many times before.. so I guess if I'd line up that shot I would use some kind of really interesting or abstract foreground to frame in the bottom more, then use a distinctive focal point in the top center of the frame... such as a smokestack or water tower. A plane crossing the sky with contrails would be cool too.
2)
I think I've taken several photos like this when I was reading the books. It has good contrast, range, the tone is a little mute because of the overcast sky. Texture is good with the rocks. Once again, nice DoF.
3)
Vig on the corners helps a lot, especially with the rich colors of red and green to draw the eye to the figure. It's a good picture, I just don't see anything special. Great looking abandonment there.
**********
There's more of a constructive, yet deconstructing analysis.
I'd like to know what film was used in the first shot.
Glass
|
|
tippa
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
boner jamz
| | Re: Vertical is good
<Reply # 7 on 4/3/2006 5:14 PM >
| | | | i enjoy the third. it feels warm with the clouds and the gold.
Not a single fuck given...
|
|
Jonsered
Location: Back in New Mexico where I belong
Gender: Male
Dressed for a scarecrow ball.........
| |  | | Re: Vertical is good
<Reply # 8 on 4/3/2006 7:58 PM >
| | | | 1 & 3 look nice. The colors in 3 really make it pop. I just can't get into 2. The out of focus people in the background drag my eye away from the rocks in front.
I have changed my personal exploring ethics code. From now on it will be: "Take only aimed shots, leave only hobo corpses." Copper scrappers, meth heads and homeless beware. The Jonsered cometh among you, bringing fear and dread.
|
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 125 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 738476995 pages have been generated.
|
|
