forums
new posts
donate
UER Store
events
location db
db map
search
members
faq
terms of service
privacy policy
register
login




UER Forum > Archived UE Photo Critiques > Kitty Litter Factory (Viewed 523 times)
stoop_master 


Location: south uk
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | sub-urban
Kitty Litter Factory
< on 3/14/2006 4:23 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Some resent pics from a kitty litter factory. What do u guys think?

Cheers

stoop

pic1

pic2

pic3

pic4

pic5

pic6


Many more new photo's here http://www.stoop.h...album=lastup&cat=0

[Please, no ALLCAPS in the subject, thanks. - The Mgmt.]
[last edit 3/14/2006 10:17 PM by Servo - edited 2 times]

www.sub-urban.com www.st00p.net
laslow 


Location: Tewksbury, MA


you have quite a temper for someone who takes pictures of flowers

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: KITTY LITTER FACTORY- rate hard!
<Reply # 1 on 3/14/2006 5:06 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Your signature is slightly distracting/annoying.

Your camera has really bad bokeh. It's just THAT bad I have to mention it. (:
#5 it's the worst.

#2 the foreground is almost too blurry. I would have used a higher f/stop.

Otherwise, they are fairly satisfying.

#4 and #3 I enjoy the most.

The best ones are on that link. Why did you not post them?
[last edit 3/14/2006 5:14 PM by laslow - edited 3 times]

stoop_master 


Location: south uk
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | sub-urban
Re: KITTY LITTER FACTORY- rate hard!
<Reply # 2 on 3/14/2006 5:23 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by laslow


Your camera has really bad bokeh. It's just THAT bad I have to mention it. (:
#5 it's the worst.



Hi

"really bad bokeh"

What does that mean???

stoop



www.sub-urban.com www.st00p.net
nobody 


Location: VANCOUVER B.C.
Gender: Male


5:55 is a state of mind

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: KITTY LITTER FACTORY
<Reply # 3 on 3/14/2006 5:37 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I think they are pretty good....reminds me I have to pick up litter. N.

Operating Entirely With Bad Intentions
Servo 






Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: KITTY LITTER FACTORY
<Reply # 4 on 3/14/2006 9:53 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by laslow
Your camera has really bad bokeh. It's just THAT bad I have to mention it. (:

I've seen worse... the consequence of bad background bokeh is that the foreground bokeh is nice.

This is bad bokeh:


[last edit 3/14/2006 9:54 PM by Servo - edited 1 times]

nobody 


Location: VANCOUVER B.C.
Gender: Male


5:55 is a state of mind

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: KITTY LITTER FACTORY
<Reply # 5 on 3/14/2006 9:57 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Bokeh, is that an actual photography term? N.

Operating Entirely With Bad Intentions
Servo 






Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: KITTY LITTER FACTORY
<Reply # 6 on 3/14/2006 10:11 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by nobody
Bokeh, is that an actual photography term? N.


http://www.kenrock...com/tech/bokeh.htm
[last edit 3/14/2006 10:14 PM by Servo - edited 1 times]

nobody 


Location: VANCOUVER B.C.
Gender: Male


5:55 is a state of mind

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Kitty Litter Factory
<Reply # 7 on 3/14/2006 10:31 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Servo


http://www.kenrock...com/tech/bokeh.htm



Good, thanks Servo. N.


Operating Entirely With Bad Intentions
mortimer 


Location: teronno




Send Private Message | Send Email | 
Re: Kitty Litter Factory
<Reply # 8 on 3/14/2006 10:54 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Nice shots, a touch soft, but that could be because they're scanned prints? There's a greenish cast on all of them that really destroys what could be some nice, vibrant reds, but again, if you scanned prints, it was probably the printer's fault.

Anyway, #4 would be killer if you cropped out the brick/tile wall on the left hand side, nice abstract type shot. Overall, I'd say decent shots hidden by bad printing.

yep.
Glass 


Location: Chicago


as one does

Send Private Message | Send Email | Substreet
Re: Kitty Litter Factory
<Reply # 9 on 3/14/2006 11:33 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 


"bokeh"




I thought I was the only one who knew that term!
[last edit 3/14/2006 11:34 PM by Glass - edited 1 times]

Scaggs 


Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Kitty Litter Factory
<Reply # 10 on 3/14/2006 11:42 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Servo


http://www.kenrock...com/tech/bokeh.htm


Damn, you learn something new every day.

nd31 






Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Kitty Litter Factory
<Reply # 11 on 3/16/2006 2:35 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Number two is killer sans the almost poorly-photoshopped look of the blur at the extreme foreground.

[Edit: And what's wrong with Bokeh?]
[last edit 3/16/2006 2:36 AM by nd31 - edited 1 times]

cmt9000 


Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | Photos
Re: Kitty Litter Factory
<Reply # 12 on 3/16/2006 1:09 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Wow...talk about Bokeh...sounds yiddish...

http://www.flickr....tos/cmt_pitt/sets/
laslow 


Location: Tewksbury, MA


you have quite a temper for someone who takes pictures of flowers

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Kitty Litter Factory
<Reply # 13 on 3/16/2006 2:29 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by cmt9000
Wow...talk about Bokeh...sounds yiddish...


japanese, actually.

Lonestar 


Location: DALLAS
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Kitty Litter Factory
<Reply # 14 on 3/16/2006 7:51 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
my fav is number 2!

UER Forum > Archived UE Photo Critiques > Kitty Litter Factory (Viewed 523 times)



All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site: UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service | View Privacy Policy | Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 171 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739817872 pages have been generated.