 |
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
741 online
Server Time:
2024-05-15 19:41:28
|
|
|
 dtewsacrificial
    
Location: Bay Area, CA
Gender: Male
On my way out the door.
 |  |  | Re: LA: Photographer or Terrorist?
<Reply # 1 on 8/31/2012 1:07 AM >
|  | | | Well, there goes LA draining and crane climbing...
|
|
seedy
Location: Triad, North Carolina
Gender: Male
Won't eat you.
| | | Re: LA: Photographer or Terrorist?
<Reply # 2 on 9/1/2012 3:51 AM >
| | | | Hey, look at the bright side, at least it's not "shoot on sight"....yet.
Architecture, nature, alcohol....
Space travel, Rock n Roll. |
|
JBuss
Location: China Lake
Gender: Male
Rolling out the .50 cal just for Elf-boy
| | Re: LA: Photographer or Terrorist?
<Reply # 3 on 9/1/2012 6:33 AM >
| | | | if that happens to me then LAPD is going to get fuckin sued.
|
|
ToXiC
 
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Gender: Male
Original Jackassary.
| |  |  | | Re: LA: Photographer or Terrorist?
<Reply # 4 on 9/1/2012 8:30 AM >
| | | | Wouldnt being caught (granted you could be held for 24hrs and questioned) still fall under a Trespassing charge assuming it wasnt government property, ie, Power Plants, Military, etc..?
Savage Hooligan |
|
Keaven
Location: 15 miles from the Grassy Knoll
Gender: Male
| |  | Re: LA: Photographer or Terrorist?
<Reply # 5 on 9/1/2012 4:19 PM >
| | | | I have concerns that this could be misused, but don't have a problem with the policy per se.
"the LAPD this week moved ahead with an official policy that considers taking photos and videotaping of some buildings suspicious activity"
1. "official" - this only makes an informal policy a formal one. LEOs already stop and ID some photographer under some circumstances.
2. "some" buildings - There is nothing too suspicious about taking photos of the Golden Gate bridge but I might wonder about someone taking photos of people coming and going from the employee entrance of the police station, an abortion clinic and several other places.
3. "suspicious" activity - not illegal activity. They don't seem to be trying to criminalizing photography, they are only formalizing that photography can raise reasonable suspicion and warrant investigation under some circumstances.
Could this be misused? Certainly. Police could use this policy as an excuse to harass anyone with a camera, however this can, and unfortunately does occasionally, occur even without any formal policy.
|
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 125 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741853593 pages have been generated.
|
|
