Posted by Uzi- Its still alive not terribly active but still alive. How's the 8-16 it looks like a nice lens from all the reviews I've read. How are you getting along with the 7D? |
Posted by TheVicariousVadder 7D has been absolutely wonderful. I see no reason to upgrade (not at a 3-4K loss to replace my APS-C lenses with FF equivs), haven't been going out as much as I'd like, but been really busy in college, and school comes first right? |
Posted by Eastwood I have also been debating between the Sigma 8-16, the Tokina 11-16, or the Canon 10-22. I like the image and build quality of the Tokina the best, but the range of the Sigma and Canon seem a bit more attractive. Any opinions on these wide-angles? |
Posted by maester 1. Nikon 18-55mm This is the lens that came with the camera, and overall it does pretty decent job. I shoot with a tripod, so I that helps a lot when I'm in a dark or dimly lit area. I do a lot of long exposure shots as well, so it's a necessity for that. The lens is very sharp at about 35mm and f/7-8. Dpreview.com has an interactive display of the sharpness at each zoom and aperture, so it's a good idea to check that out. |
2. Nikon 55-200mm VR This isn't the most expensive telephoto lens by any means, but it takes fantastic pictures whenever there's enough light to support a fast shutter speed (1/250 or higher). I don't use it much for urbex though. |
3. Nikon f/1.8 35mm Autofocus I just bought this lens a few days ago, and already I love it. I haven't used it yet for urbex, but there's a few things I've figured out. According to dpreview.com and other sites, the lens gets extremely sharp starting at f/2.8. That isn't to say, however, that it's no good with a larger aperture. I've taken some great photos already on f/1.8. |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |