UER Mobile Forum UER Mobile - Not logged in
Home  Search   User Search   Login  Register  
Messages   New Posts   Favourites   Recent Posts   Recent Views   My LDB   My Buddies  


UER Mobile > Rookie Forum > Policy on posting not so abandoned pictures? (Viewed 305 times)

post by Calomel   |  | 
Policy on posting not so abandoned pictures?
< on 2/8/2024 11:14 AM >

I'd recently explored an old forgotten shed, though after going in and poking around a bit, I'm not so sure it was actually abandoned. I came across some equipment that I don't think someone would just leave to rot (though I may be wrong), and it got me thinking.

I've read some threads on signs of true abandonment before (there's one really good one I'm thinking of but can't find at the moment), and even then I'm not 100% sure. It seems like it'd fit the criteria for being abandoned, but I know there have been some cases where all signs point to a place being empty, and that turns out to not be so true.

Assuming it is still being used by someone, what are the policies for posting those pictures? Is this frowned upon when someones still using it? I'm not sure how active that would be, or if it's mainly old storage, but either way.

Thanks!

(also, is there a way to not have colon-d correct to an emote? lol)


Reply with Quote


post by fr00tCake   |  | 
Re: Policy on posting not so abandoned pictures?
<Reply # 1 on 2/8/2024 1:20 PM >

What you are referring to is infiltration. While urbex/rurex normally is abandoned/unused buildings and infrastructure, it doesn't define it. Infiltration is 100% urbex. IMHO, share as you wish - whether or not others agree with the manner of exploration or even if the pics are interesting is subjective.


Reply with Quote


post by Calomel   |  | 
Re: Policy on posting not so abandoned pictures?
<Reply # 2 on 2/8/2024 9:38 PM >

Ah I see, thank you!


Reply with Quote



Reply



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.



77 ms gen time