Posted by blackhawk <snip> Squaring off the images helps when framing them up; true vertical lines should be parallel to the frame sides. <snip> |
Posted by Abby Normal Good point. Most photo editing software allows you to rotate the image by degrees, or fractions of degrees, in order to straighten up the alignment of the picture. Generally you have to slightly re-crop the image afterwards to get back to a rectangular photo. I use this technique when I find my images that aren't properly horizontal or vertical. Some cameras have an option to display a grid in viewfinder that can help you determine whether your camera is square to vertical or horizontal lines in the composition. Abby Normal |
Posted by MonkeyGang Thank you for the replies! I didn't even consider camera shake for the blur. What do you consider a "high shutter speed" that I could use to capture something quickly, say a moving bird? I used instagram's editor for a quick attempt at squaring this photo off. I understand there is quality loss, but I can't see the difference at this size. ![]() https://i.imgur.com/JaXynAj.jpg |
Posted by blackhawk Simply rotating the image will not square it off as the angles of lines across the image will be off. You can make look better many times, often losing some of the image. That doesn't take the place of a properly square off shot; you can't manipulate information you didn't capture! I pick a spot on a subject I want as frame center and get the cam to the same height, then find preferably two true vertical lines to line the sides up with. People shooting I can square it up pretty good in seconds. Good framing is critical to nailing keepers. |
Posted by Abby Normal Yes! To my way of thinking, photo editing is primarily used when you didn't correctly capture the image when you pressed the shutter button. A well composed and exposed image straight out of the camera will beat an image that has to be corrected in post processing. Also keeping in mind that some errors, as you point out with squaring the line angles, just can't be completely fixed. Generally you can correct one side of the image, but the other will remain skewed. I've spent a lot of time trying to fix my own screw-ups and it's rarely satisfactory. The one technique that I often use is to crop an image to achieve a better image. Again, it should have been properly composed in-camera, but the results are usually an improvement to the image. I think the take-away is this: Taking time to properly compose and expose the image is time well spent. The "point and push" will get you a snapshot, but rarely a cinematic image. Slow down and get the shot. Abby |
Posted by blackhawk That little rotation trick wouldn't work on #4 as the columns in the background would be off if you corrected for the one in the foreground. It be less noticeable but still flawed. |
Posted by rob.i.am Literally 10 seconds in Snapseed. Not perfect but close enough. https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48244942292_49888a6e92_z.jpg3CDA78D0-893B-4D8B-B8A1-AE33E70A5AB2 by Rob, on Flickr |
Posted by blackhawk Jeeeeezse, takes less time then that to square it off... ![]() |
Posted by rob.i.am Which is awesome, if your goal is to have a square photo. |
Posted by blackhawk Squared off not square ![]() Problem being there will be many images that can not be salvage after the fact. |
Posted by Tarnished Wow, such lovely pictures [bla bla bla, and spam link] |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |