Posted by jc0507 A good camera can really make the picture, and I think you're in need of a new one. Early digital cameras aren't exactly the best. I think you did a great job with your resources though!!! Editing looks fine to me. |
Post by ryanpics The edits definitely make the pictures look better. There's only so much you can do with a dark jpg, especially when it has grain to begin with. Shooting on such an old camera is a big drawback for quick shooting like it seems like you do. If you don't want to carry around a tripod and do a longer exposure for every shot then a newer camera might be nice. I think that you're pictures show the places extremely well, so if you're content with that then that's great. In general, a newer camera would make the pictures a little bit cleaner and maybe give you more flexibility with a wider lens, but it's not at all necessary if you don't think it is. |
Posted by Cfourexplore Wow, thank you for this...unfortunately, I tend to mostly rely on my auto settings, but I've messed around a bit with the ISO settings; not so much with the shutter speed. I'll probably always be a better explorer than photographer (at least til I quit being lazy and just point and click), but before putting some bucks down on a new camera, I think I'll try your suggestions (although it wouldn't hurt to have a wider angle lens). This is very concise and understandable information, I appreciate your time and advice; I will definitely put it to use and see how it goes. Also, that pic you added is sweet! Love the coloration; good shooting! Thanks again! |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |