Posted by blackhawk Shooting horizontal rather than vertical depending on and if it was a digital cam would have bumped the resolution up. |
Posted by DJ Craig How so? This doesn't sound correct to me, but maybe I'm misunderstanding you. |
Posted by blackhawk The resolution varied depending on vertical or horizontal orientation I believe that was so on all my Canon's. It has to do with the framing. I could be mistaken but I don't think so. I'm not sure why as at least at first it seems counter intuitive. |
Posted by DJ Craig Siper, you are correct. Orientation doesn't affect resolution. The only explanation I can think of for this is maybe using some kind of software that is scaling images to fit within a certain max width, and a different max height. |
Posted by DJ Craig It's a little visually cluttered and doesn't have much contrast so it's confusing to look at. This picture has layers - it has a distinctive foreground, middle, and background. Ideally we would want more visual separation and contrast between those layers. Perhaps it could be worth experimenting with a fill flash to light up the foreground more, and/or a lower depth of field. I think also a lower exposure overall would help. This subject, to me, seems like it should be creepy, but it's too brightly lit to actually have that feel. And having some parts of the shot deliberately underexposed might help with the visual clutter. |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |