Infiltration
THEORY
Ethics
Observations
 
PRACTICE
Abandoned Sites
Boats
Churches
Drains/Catacombs
Hotels/Hospitals
Transit Tunnels
Utility Tunnels
Various
 
RESOURCES
Exploration Timeline
Infilnews
Infilspeak Dictionary
Usufruct Blog
Worldwide Links
Infiltration Forums home | search | login | register

Reply
Page: < 1 2 3 4 > 
Infiltration Forums > Private Boards Index > COMM info and technical > NSFW police scanner help(Viewed 19866 times)
rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 20 on 8/23/2009 6:30 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
careful the superheterodyne receiver local oscillator does not get detected and get you in shit.



ducky 999
NoSuchPerson
Stop, or I'll ask you again!
 
  |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 21 on 8/23/2009 9:01 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Yeah, that's not going to happen.

Even on a shitty scanner, the IF shielding is good enough that it can't be detected more than a few feet away.

Besides, who the hell police is gonna have the right equipment?

Hell, our government (Industry Canada) doesn't have the ability to monitor P25 for christ sakes...



Unit calling radio say again?
rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 22 on 8/24/2009 1:04 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I've had it happen to me with radar detectors before. and seen that kind of equipment in recce veh's and maritime patrol or EW planes.



ducky 999
NoSuchPerson
Stop, or I'll ask you again!
 
  |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 23 on 8/24/2009 1:17 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER MobileQuote
Yea, radar detectors are MUCH different than a scanner. Not to mention illegal.



Unit calling radio say again?
rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 24 on 8/24/2009 1:30 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
true. I'm just saying be careful. certain agencies can detect the local oscillator.

your average cop? hell no. just a word of caution. I dont want anyone getting busted.



ducky 999
Agent Skelly
Web Sheriff
 
location:
Oregon Territory
 
 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | AIM Message | AgentSkelly's Urban Explorations
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 25 on 8/24/2009 9:52 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by rz350
true. I'm just saying be careful. certain agencies can detect the local oscillator.

your average cop? hell no. just a word of caution. I dont want anyone getting busted.


Be careful? I think if you have the NSA/CSIS/CSE/RCMP/FBI using equipment to detect the local oscillator in your scanner, then you are really really doing something wrong.



rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 26 on 8/24/2009 11:32 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
yes, you are, but you KNOW someone will well try explore area 51/the farm/dwyer hill and get pwned.

kind of like the do not aim at self on that older model LAAW or SRAAW.



ducky 999
Agent Skelly
Web Sheriff
 
location:
Oregon Territory
 
 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | AIM Message | AgentSkelly's Urban Explorations
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 27 on 8/24/2009 5:02 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by rz350
yes, you are, but you KNOW someone will well try explore area 51/the farm/dwyer hill and get pwned.

kind of like the do not aim at self on that older model LAAW or SRAAW.


Umm...wow...newsflash....its been known that Groom Lake has a tower connected to the Nellis Test & Traning Range's EDACS system with the ProVoice vocoder.



rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 28 on 8/25/2009 4:36 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
yeah, dug, but there are people out there who do stupid shit like trying scan MP/security and enter these kind of facilites, I just dont wanna see anyone go though that. a warning that a scanner is not "invisible" because its only a RX device. some people need to be warned about that risk.



ducky 999
Agent Skelly
Web Sheriff
 
location:
Oregon Territory
 
 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | AIM Message | AgentSkelly's Urban Explorations
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 29 on 8/25/2009 4:53 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by rz350
yeah, dug, but there are people out there who do stupid shit like trying scan MP/security and enter these kind of facilites, I just dont wanna see anyone go though that. a warning that a scanner is not "invisible" because its only a RX device. some people need to be warned about that risk.


Dude, its a risk that you need to be worried about UNLESS you are wanted by the CIA, MI6, etc. Like ExKa said, not even Canada possess the equipment to detect the ocal oscillator. There's only ONE agency in the world that has the equipment and its the NSA of my nation. And I've heard them only using it once.

And using a scanner to aid in committing a serious crime is against the law in all US and Canadian jurisdictions. So your warning is not needed.

BTW, can you tell us what radio you have?




rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 30 on 8/25/2009 5:28 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
the most useful of the standard radios imo is the IRIS, the Light Assault radio sucks balls and the AN/PRC-113 is okay I guess but there custom made ones by electronic techs for recce use/SOF use/EW use/and other things. they dont have a model or designation, its like an improvised explosive device, you dont call it a MK-82URV (under road version) its just a IED



ducky 999
NoSuchPerson
Stop, or I'll ask you again!
 
  |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 31 on 8/25/2009 11:09 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER MobileQuote
I prefer to call it bovine excrament.

If you've got your nose into something that's got the NSA/FBI/SS/CIA sniffing up your ass enough to be trying to detect the use of a scanner -- perhaps listening to the cops is the least of your concerns.



Unit calling radio say again?
rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 32 on 8/26/2009 8:09 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
no, I ment people trying to sneak into extremely high security facilities using a scanner to hear if anyone is on them, not knowing the scanner can be detected, and getting owned.



ducky 999
Agent Skelly
Web Sheriff
 
location:
Oregon Territory
 
 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | AIM Message | AgentSkelly's Urban Explorations
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 33 on 8/26/2009 8:42 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by rz350
no, I ment people trying to sneak into extremely high security facilities using a scanner to hear if anyone is on them, not knowing the scanner can be detected, and getting owned.


.....we don't do that. Do you?



rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 34 on 8/26/2009 10:55 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
not at any big installation with the equipment to pick up a singal that weak. we're gonna secure a check point in afghanistan for eg to that level so solder 1 radios soldier 5 "ima gonna pinch a loaf" az taliban suicide bomber knows he has to chance to get to the point and kill everyone.

but I wouldnt try to explore and tak pictures if dwyer hill using your scanner to hear us on local radios and thus try to guess when security wont see you.
places like that have around the facility things to listen to that kind of thing. then you have teams roaving on with no radio that are training at something, and you might get lucky tnough to bump in them.

Just stay away for secret or very off limits locations period.



ducky 999
RailGuy88
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
Where you're not...
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 35 on 8/26/2009 11:10 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Huh? So that means that I can't track radio signals at gov sites anymore? And I was having fun!



Going where others can't...
rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 36 on 8/27/2009 12:12 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
most gov sites are fine. I'm talking places that kept secret and off limits to nearly everyone. usually special forces or intelligence agents with cryptograph production, complex crypo, advanced, that stuff, you stay away from, esp with scanner and a camera. ect. dont try using your scanner for that.



ducky 999
Agent Skelly
Web Sheriff
 
location:
Oregon Territory
 
 |  |  | Yahoo! IM | AIM Message | AgentSkelly's Urban Explorations
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 37 on 8/27/2009 12:34 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by rz350
not at any big installation with the equipment to pick up a singal that weak. we're gonna secure a check point in afghanistan for eg to that level so solder 1 radios soldier 5 "ima gonna pinch a loaf" az taliban suicide bomber knows he has to chance to get to the point and kill everyone.

but I wouldnt try to explore and tak pictures if dwyer hill using your scanner to hear us on local radios and thus try to guess when security wont see you.
places like that have around the facility things to listen to that kind of thing. then you have teams roaving on with no radio that are training at something, and you might get lucky tnough to bump in them.

Just stay away for secret or very off limits locations period.


Where do I begin?

1) You are not with JTF2. You never were with any Canadian Forces of any kind. Please stop implying you were unless you can prove otherwise such as your tag number.
2) Your radio signal even at 1W can be heard from public property.
3) Canada follows the NATO standard of military radio allocations for interoperability.
4) I have monitored Groom Lake from public property among other secure facilites safely. I'm sure the FBI has a note on that in my file.



rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 38 on 8/27/2009 1:25 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
im not giving away tag number. but I'll give the format of the top tag.

obverse
sn x45 645 342
g v bloggins
nre o/rh/pos
cdn forces cdn
they come atcheted to each other, not as two seperate tags like the US but they snap in half, one goes with the body one goes to the chain of command.

reverse do not remove
ne pas enlever.

next time your in to, come to hook up and i'll quickly show my military id card, but either with unit, name hidden with a little piece of tape.

card layout as follows for temp card due to loosing my main one
front left side al a picture of the mbr.
right side top to bottom.
surname
given names
status and a service number with gold colored ]\ (I am an NCM on my card
expiration
issuing officer, I am su case its a person the sea enviroment and posted to a land unit.

reverse side left to right, top to bottom
born sex weight hair


eyes
scars,
amputatations. (visible]
complextion.
date and unit of issue.
serial numbe c holders signature,


[last edit 8/27/2009 2:20 AM by rz350 - edited 1 times]

ducky 999
rz350
This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
 
location:
toronto
 
 |  | 
Re: NSFW police scanner help
<Reply # 39 on 8/27/2009 1:28 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
all the standard radios are nato interoperable. there are just some kit for cansofcom that isnt. most militaries have different equipment, even non standard, for their operations.



ducky 999
Infiltration Forums > Private Boards Index > COMM info and technical > NSFW police scanner help(Viewed 19866 times)
Page: < 1 2 3 4 > 
Reply

Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.

Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 140 ms