|
|
and re reading what you wrote made me think that you meant they can search what I have written here, not the longline itself, so let me address that too. Pretty much everything I already said holds true with this other understanding of what you said too, I believe. I don't think I have put any information out there that I shouldn't have that was any different from the people in the photography subforum are directly associating themselves with evidence against them. Please forgive me if any of what I have said comes off as combative, with the inclusion of the details and my picking apart of your wording, I don't want to seem like I'm evidence bomb dropping to be argumentative, I just want to make myself clear as to why I don't understand what you meant 
Feel free to hit me up | |
You didn't do anything wrong, but it isn't helping your cause either...
Post the pics, but the more info, even just bringing a group of sites into public awareness tends to glean undesirable attentions especially on public viewable threads.
Many times I don't even post pics until a pristine site is gone or secured... if I value it.
Once a site is trashed it will never be the same... or as much fun.
&
Giving LEOs a leg up on your plans can come back to bite you. It also shows premeditation if found after the fact.
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in.
|
Add a poll to this thread
This thread is one of your Favourites. Click to make normal.Click to make this thread a Favourite.
| This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 47 ms
|
|
Ethics
