|
|
It is OK to shoot UrbEx stuff with Hasselblad?
It is worth to take a risk for great quality?
Do you ever shoot on abandoned location with Hasselblad?
Discussion 
| |
I've shot abandonments on a Rolleiflex with an 80mm f/2.8 lens, do it which is basically a Hasselblad with the standard 80mm lens. The results are fantastic.
Celer at Audax
Para la Victoria Siempre Alemanes! | |
Posted by /dev/nox
It is OK to shoot UrbEx stuff with Hasselblad?
It is worth to take a risk for great quality?
Do you ever shoot on abandoned location with Hasselblad?
Discussion
|
It is just a camera, if anything happened to it it could be replaced or repaired.
"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water and stupid men." - Richard Nickel | |
Posted by yokes
It is just a camera, if anything happened to it it could be replaced or repaired.
|
^ That.
Asking other ppl if it's okay to take a Hasselblad somewhere seems a bit daft to me... I mean, photojournalists take 10,000$ Canon / Nikon kits to literal warzones. A Hasselblad 500 is less expensive than most people's Digital Rebels, so yeah. Urbex the hell outta some places with that camera. You'll get different photos than you would with small-format.
|
Add a poll to this thread
This thread is one of your Favourites. Click to make normal.Click to make this thread a Favourite.
| This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 46 ms
|
|
Ethics
