|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
794 online
Server Time:
2024-05-10 12:20:21
|
|
|
bsidez
Gender: Male
Go unpaved paths and leave no trail behind
| | | La Chartreuse revisited in HDR + Update! < on 3/19/2006 1:25 PM >
| | | Some pictures i shot recently at La Chartreuse: #1
#2
#3
#4
#5 [last edit 3/19/2006 11:18 PM by bsidez - edited 2 times]
visit #urbex @ irc.tweakers.net :: http://flickr.com/photos/bsidez |
|
ScourgeVW call me Hamilton
Location: Not Hamilton Anymore. Gender: Male
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 1 on 3/19/2006 1:48 PM >
| | | Wow .... Those are amazing, I have no words for it. New Desktop! Thanks for sharing!!!! -George
http://mrscourge.deviantart.com/ Is it time for Man-Rage yet? |
|
yaggy
Location: Tunnel #8 Gender: Male
| | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 2 on 3/19/2006 2:22 PM >
| | | I like how you've achieved almost an oil painting look. It definitely makes these interesting scenes stand out even more.
|
|
desmet
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
| | | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 4 on 3/19/2006 6:51 PM >
| | | Huh, I really hadn't seen much HDR before this. I'm not sure that I like the unnatural oil painting look of it. It takes away the relative brightness of things in the scene. I understand with the contrast ratios of current monitors that you can't show things at their actual relative brightness, but I don't like how it puts everything at the same level. I mean the sky should look brighter than the inside of the building but with HDR it seems to just make the luminance all exactly the same. I think I like bracket and blend better than this...it's not as effective but it looks a lot more natural. I love the composition of these photos though, and for these particular subjects I don't mind the HDR as a creative tool. The only one that doesn't work for me is the first (outside is just too dark) but the rest are cool. I think the HDR look works the best with the 2nd and 4th.
|
|
brendan
Location: Toronto Gender: Male
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 5 on 3/19/2006 6:53 PM >
| | | These are the first HDR images I've seen that don't look terrible, in fact these look damn good. I keep wanting to comment that number 1 and 4 look too low contrast, but then that's not the point of HDR images. Even so, all photos need something white and something black in them so they don't look like they were shot through a foggy lens (kind of like your first image there). But in number 2 and 5 you've got black shadows and some white highlights, it gives them the contrast of an engaging photo, but also that unreal depth of HDR. Number 4 is so close to being perfect, you just need something there that's black, otherwise it looks too HDR'y, if you get what I mean. [last edit 3/20/2006 4:00 PM by brendan - edited 1 times]
http://www.morebrendanplease.com |
|
smalltowngirl
Gender: Female
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 6 on 3/19/2006 7:13 PM >
| | | Amazing... I'm pretty much speechless..
|
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 7 on 3/19/2006 7:55 PM >
| | | Excellent thread, and pics! Thanks for teaching me new tricks! Increased dynamic range is good. http://www.luminou...utorials/hdr.shtml
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
Lexi
Location: Oslo, Norway Gender: Female
I'm getting old.
| | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 8 on 3/19/2006 7:56 PM >
| | | I think I just piddled myself in sheer amazement.
[15:00:33] <SeeThirty> cause you're not likely to be anywhere that other people haven't been who didn't have protection [15:00:41] <SeeThirty> still better safe than lexi |
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 9 on 3/19/2006 8:02 PM >
| | | If your shooting RAW images is one image enough to use HDR effectively? Do RAW images capture enough of the total dynamic range if the one shot RAW exposure setting is properly "centered"?
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
bsidez
Gender: Male
Go unpaved paths and leave no trail behind
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 10 on 3/19/2006 8:35 PM >
| | | one raw image can work , but you have to remove the exif data (for example by choosing save for the web) else it won't work because most HDR programs look at the exif information, but still i think at least 3 different exposures is better [last edit 3/19/2006 8:35 PM by bsidez - edited 1 times]
visit #urbex @ irc.tweakers.net :: http://flickr.com/photos/bsidez |
|
atomx
Location: Brighton, ON Gender: Male
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 11 on 3/19/2006 9:07 PM >
| | | From what I found it's bes to take several images, using a cable release would be the best for LOW movement. And leave the shutter open for longer and longer times. I've yet to try this but these do look so far the best I've seen. Wiki flickr
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Richard Cook |
|
desmet
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
| | | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 12 on 3/19/2006 10:18 PM >
| | | Thanks for posting this. This thread has inspired me to go through some of the bracket and bled shots I've taken and try them in the CS2 HDR merger thing. I have some interesting results that don't have the oil painting look at all. Very interesting...and way easier than manual bracket and blend. Something to look in to...
|
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR <Reply # 13 on 3/19/2006 10:51 PM >
| | | Posted by bsidez one raw image can work , but you have to remove the exif data (for example by choosing save for the web) else it won't work because most HDR programs look at the exif information, but still i think at least 3 different exposures is better
|
You mean convert the RAW to a Tiff or Jpeg. In CS2 can you use the DNG as the source instead of Jpegs? [last edit 3/19/2006 10:53 PM by blackhawk - edited 1 times]
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
bsidez
Gender: Male
Go unpaved paths and leave no trail behind
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR + Update! <Reply # 14 on 3/19/2006 11:23 PM >
| | | I don't know , all i know is that the HDR function in PS looks at the exif, so best is to convert it to jpegs with multiple exposures from RAW and loose the exif information... Here's an update: #6
#7
#8
#9
#10
visit #urbex @ irc.tweakers.net :: http://flickr.com/photos/bsidez |
|
blackhawk This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Mission Control
UER newbie
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR + Update! <Reply # 15 on 3/19/2006 11:46 PM >
| | | Those are stunning, even as low res Jpegs. Damn. Thank you for sharing technic as well as pictures!
Just when I thought I was out... they pulled me back in. |
|
bsidez
Gender: Male
Go unpaved paths and leave no trail behind
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR + Update! <Reply # 16 on 3/20/2006 1:29 AM >
| | | You are welcome my friend, don't forget to check out Photomatix (www.hdrsoft.com), great software.
visit #urbex @ irc.tweakers.net :: http://flickr.com/photos/bsidez |
|
nd31
| | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR + Update! <Reply # 17 on 3/20/2006 1:40 AM >
| | | Very refreshing. They look almost surreal at some points (like a 3d render). What camera did you use?
|
|
Axle
Location: Milton, ON Gender: Male
Sieg oder Tod
| | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR + Update! <Reply # 18 on 3/20/2006 2:10 AM >
| | | holy shit.
Celer at Audax Para la Victoria Siempre Alemanes! |
|
danhooligan
Location: Toronto, ON Gender: Male
| | | Re: La Chartreuse revisited in HDR + Update! <Reply # 19 on 3/20/2006 2:36 AM >
| | | I second that. Incredible shots, and location.
|
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 203 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741242685 pages have been generated.
|
|