i know most people have changed from normal cammeras to digital. but me, i use a good old film camera. i don't even use that much. i usually use a disposal which lasts me a year. seriosly who takes so many pictures to justify spending $150-thousands on a digital camera?i know that expanding the picture for a regular camera doesn't make it go all blurry or pixilated but thats just my point of view. who else here doesn't own a digital cammera?

Are we talking still image or moving image? If it's still, I'm not sure this is in the right thread.
Either way, I'm straddling the divide. I use a digital camera as well as my film camera for still images, and I use a miniDV Pro-sumer camera as well as a super-8.

I have a digital rebel, but I use my other cameras much more frequently. However, I only have the kit lens, and when I have money and upgrade, I may be more inclined to use it verus film.

I use your average over-the-counter Canon zr60. Compact, unobtrusive, good image quality, good audio, and it converts digital to analogue. I picked up a 9hr battery, and a wide angle adapter. Nice little rig.

I have a Nikon D200 but I also have a 35mm I use not as much but sometimes.