|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
853 online
Server Time:
2024-03-28 11:36:33
|
|
|
el nerdo Chief UER Lackey
Gender: Male
What are you, from the Department of Know'm Sayin's? You takin' a Know'm census?
| | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 20 on 12/6/2010 3:03 AM >
| | | Posted by hydrotherapy Can the new read states replace Xmas this year? Please?
|
Fuck that. Needs MORE Christmas - and earlier.
|
|
hydrotherapy Clever Girl
Location: Circle of Least Confusion
RPS is inside all of us
| | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 21 on 12/6/2010 3:40 AM >
| | | Posted by el nerdo
Fuck that. Needs MORE Christmas - and earlier.
|
I will fight you.
Get down, girl, go 'head, get down. |
|
Avatar-X Alpha Husky
Location: West Coast Gender: Male
yay!
| | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 22 on 12/6/2010 3:45 AM >
| | | Posted by WarBird69 Hm...am I doing something wrong? New threads are showing green, existing threads with new replies are showing blue. This is reguardless if I've read the thread or not, which is sort of annoying..
|
With the new system, UER won't know exactly which threads you've read. If your "read date" was Tuesday and a new thread was posted Monday, with new posts Wednedsay, it will show in Blue, even though you haven't read it at all. -av
huskies - such fluff. |
|
Chris-Kicker
Location: New York, NY Gender: Male
no, I did not Kick Chris.
| | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 23 on 12/6/2010 4:12 AM >
| | | Posted by Avatar-X
With the new system, UER won't know exactly which threads you've read. If your "read date" was Tuesday and a new thread was posted Monday, with new posts Wednedsay, it will show in Blue, even though you haven't read it at all. -av
|
IM CONFUSSSEDD :/ i'll get over it..
CHRISTMASS TIMEE!!
http://ChurchofAtom.com/ "Signatures are still stupid" |
|
Dougo Wrong account -- Look for other Doug
Location: Victoria, Australia Gender: Male
| | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 24 on 12/6/2010 5:20 AM >
| | | Posted by Avatar-X With 36,000 members and hundreds of thousands of threads, that adds up to a hell of a lot of rows.
|
I don't really understand how this stuff works, but if you killed off the 20,000+ who haven't logged in for however long, wouldn't that clear things up a bit (I'm guessing that UER is saving everyone's "read-dates" even if they haven't logged in for years)? If they haven't logged in for two years then kill their account (or something like that) or is there an advantage to having stats in the tens of thousands? <sounds sarcastic, but is a genuine question> I think also because my posts are all qual-ah-tee that I should get a Premium Membership for keeping UER that little bit classier. And remember, there are no stupid questions, just stupid people... I mean... Cheers, Doug [last edit 12/6/2010 10:13 PM by Dougo - edited 3 times]
FacialBook is killing online forums. |
|
Avatar-X Alpha Husky
Location: West Coast Gender: Male
yay!
| | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 26 on 12/6/2010 2:16 PM >
| | | Hi, to answer your questions: Dougo: We already do this, actually. But UER is a big site and has a lot of users. WR: He originally asked why we don't archive threads more often -- I just did an archiving run this weekend, actually, but there are still a lot of things that don't get archived. I think the options I've offered are fair and balanced. A lot of people don't even like UER's "advanced" system, they prefer a more forgetful system. -av
huskies - such fluff. |
|
macgruder
Location: Northern NJ Gender: Male
| | | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 27 on 12/6/2010 4:33 PM >
| | | I loved the way it was before, so now I have to pay to keep it that way? Sigh.
Canon 5D Mark III, Canon 50mm 1.2, Canon 28mm 1.8, Canon 16-35 f2.8L http://www.flickr.com/photos/stevenbley/ |
|
Durdan
Location: Ybor City, FL Gender: Male
| | | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 28 on 12/6/2010 4:58 PM >
| | | Posted by macgruder I loved the way it was before, so now I have to pay to keep it that way? Sigh.
|
you havent been here long enough to bitch.
[20:58:22] <3mpolack> i realise that i am the scum of society |
|
EatsTooMuchJam
Location: Minneapolis, MN Gender: Male
Squirty "Stickybuns" von Cherrypants
| | | | | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 29 on 12/6/2010 5:03 PM >
| | | The new system is clunky, ineffective, and $5/month to be a member of a forum with a functional read state system is overly high, given that I can pay like $25/year for a flickr pro account. Are you suggesting that your hosting fees for uer are 250% of flickr? You're right. Some people are going to call this a cash grab. They're going to be right. There are a number of relatively simple ways to re-engineer a read state system (do you even have a caching layer in place yet to offload the database?). enyim memcached client works nicely on Windows. When a user clicks into a forum group (like, for instance, "great lakes", you could query the db once then store a single object containing all of the read states for that user and all displayed topics and then update memcached in a foreground thread with a lazy write back to the db in the background - possibly even use a queuing mechanism and batch writes to reduce i/o contention since there the actual db data can tolerate relaxed consistency). Otherwise, have you also considered something which would allow a user to disable read states on the ldb for those of us who can't be bothered to care about them, but leave them active on the forum? If LDB read states are causing so much of a burden, then it would make sense to let users who don't need them simply not use them without compromising overall site usability. Otherwise, you risk (and probably will discover) that your traffic problems resolve themselves a different way in that fewer people will use your forum. That's also a nice way of keeping your database load down.
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits |
|
EatsTooMuchJam
Location: Minneapolis, MN Gender: Male
Squirty "Stickybuns" von Cherrypants
| | | | | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 30 on 12/6/2010 5:04 PM >
| | | Posted by EatsTooMuchJam The new system is clunky, ineffective, and $5/month to be a member of a forum with a functional read state system is overly high, given that I can pay like $25/year for a flickr pro account. Are you suggesting that your hosting fees for uer are 250% of flickr? You're right. Some people are going to call this a cash grab. They're going to be right. There are a number of relatively simple ways to re-engineer a read state system (do you even have a caching layer in place yet to offload the database?). enyim memcached client works nicely on Windows. When a user clicks into a forum group (like, for instance, "great lakes", you could query the db once then store a single object containing all of the read states for that user and all displayed topics and then update memcached in a foreground thread with a lazy write back to the db in the background - possibly even use a queuing mechanism and batch writes to reduce i/o contention since there the actual db data can tolerate relaxed consistency). Otherwise, have you also considered something which would allow a user to disable read states on the ldb for those of us who can't be bothered to care about them, but leave them active on the forum? If LDB read states are causing so much of a burden, then it would make sense to let users who don't need them simply not use them without compromising overall site usability. Otherwise, you risk (and probably will discover) that your traffic problems resolve themselves a different way in that fewer people will use your forum. That's also a nice way of keeping your database load down.
|
(That's aside from slightly more complex, but not-so-horrible ideas like sharding the read states table based on a hash of the username to keep individual table sizes down and potentially keep every write from blowing out your entire query cache (that depends somewhat on the database you've chosen for your backend)) [last edit 12/6/2010 5:05 PM by EatsTooMuchJam - edited 1 times]
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits |
|
-MisfitStyle-
| | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 31 on 12/6/2010 5:11 PM >
| | | Posted by EatsTooMuchJam The new system is clunky, ineffective, and $5/month to be a member of a forum with a functional read state system is overly high, given that I can pay like $25/year for a flickr pro account. Are you suggesting that your hosting fees for uer are 250% of flickr? You're right. Some people are going to call this a cash grab. They're going to be right.
|
I'm not going to debate the technical merits of your argument (you bring up a number of good points), but opening with this almost made me ignore your entire post. Are you really suggesting that Yahoo-owned Flickr is a good metric for server costs? I'd imagine the number of Flickr Pro accounts pales in comparison to the number of free accounts, as on any site. Do you really think $25/year covers the hosting costs for more than 5 billion images? (http://blog.flickr.../09/19/5000000000/) No, a whole lot of that is covered by Yahoo, a benefit Av doesn't enjoy. But at 7 years and 4159 posts, why bother contributing anything to a site you enjoy for free? [last edit 12/6/2010 5:15 PM by -MisfitStyle- - edited 2 times]
"I feel like I just got in a battle of wits with some kid in a helmet I found licking a window." Need help? Please use the Contact a Mod forum — I'm slow to see PMs. |
|
KublaKhan
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
With Satan, it's always gimmie, gimmie.
| | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 32 on 12/6/2010 5:34 PM >
| | | Posted by tholcomb Can we has christmas now?
|
With the cursor-trailing thing? And singing dogs? Maybe singing kittehs? Maybe a farting Santa?
"The truth is knowable. But probably not, ever, incontrovertible." --Don DeLillo PICS |
|
phrenzee
Location: Canada Gender: Male
| | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 33 on 12/6/2010 6:39 PM >
| | | I am not yet ready to part with LDB read states, so I made a donation. However, this will give me a month to grow accustomed to the idea that without donating, I will no longer be able to properly obsessively monitor the locations to which I am subscribed.
|
|
Ian This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: The County of Kings Gender: Male
"Great architecture has only two natural enemies: water, and stupid men."
| | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 34 on 12/6/2010 7:19 PM >
| | | ETMJ, why on earth are you suggesting that this could be a cash grab? Well let's see... 36,000 accounts, and let's say that 1/4 of these are active - so 9,000 active accounts. Picking a random low number, let's say that 2% of these are willing to pony up five bucks a month for their readstates. I'd bet 180 people care enough. So that's $900/mo, or $10,800/yr. Hopefully enough to cover a DB server, but you never know... wouldn't want to slow down UER for the users, unless, of course, it's for a dancing Santa which.... you know... slows down UER for the users. Hey wait, maybe Premium members could opt-out of "UER Christmas"?
|
|
-MisfitStyle-
| | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 35 on 12/6/2010 7:41 PM >
| | | It blows my mind how often people think someone else's time and effort should be free.
"I feel like I just got in a battle of wits with some kid in a helmet I found licking a window." Need help? Please use the Contact a Mod forum — I'm slow to see PMs. |
|
TurboZutek King Dick
Location: Scotland Gender: Male
Giant octo-penised rapephant
| | | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 36 on 12/6/2010 7:42 PM >
| | | Posted by Ian Hey wait, maybe Premium members could opt-out of "UER Christmas"?
|
I think you can if you switch to UER corporate theme? Anyways, I'm all for this new system, if it makes UER a bit faster - 'cause lately it's been slower than fuck for me. Also, as for the 'cash grab' accusations; Av didn't have to leave it possible to view read-states the old way AT ALL. Most board admins would simply say "it's changing, tough shit, deal with it" which they are totally entitled to do. As it stands Av's left a way to do it the old way if you want to, if you don't want it; don't pay for it. Pretty simple! Chris...
We all had ostriches. My dad had an ostrich farm! I remember one day someone came in and said the high altitude bombing of Kosovo had been a limited success, so we all went out and celebrated… by killing an ostrich and boiling it in kiwi fruit. |
|
kowalski
| | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 37 on 12/6/2010 8:01 PM >
| | | Ultimately I do wish there could have been some kind of middle-ground, ie. retain the old read states system for everyone as far as the forum is concerned, but only for threads with recent activity (ie. new reply within the last two weeks). I know some people are LDB power users who actually use and depend on the read states system in the database, but I think quite a few of us will miss it far more on the forums themselves. I do not echo ETMJ's baseless comments about a cash grab. However, the change does significantly degrade the way that most long-time users read the forums (through the new posts page), and I do think that $60/year is pretty steep for the privilege of being able to visually separate what you have read and cared about from what you haven't. As an alternative to the flickr comparison, I would point to metafilter.com. Much like this site, it is a self-funded, basically one-person operation (I think they have two techs actually, but same difference). What Metafilter does is charge a one-time $5 fee for account registration. For that, you get to post on the Metafilter family of sites, you get the text ads removed, and you get some control over the way that threads on its sites are displayed. Frankly I think UER would probably be far more secure financially if it followed that model, but I've come to understand Av's ideas about the openness and accessibility of the site and I understand why the idea of a registration fee probably wouldn't fly. No problem. UER has had a much better system for tracking read states and post activity than Metafilter. I think it would be reasonable to charge $5-10 per year for the privilege of using it, and I think you would get a lot better uptake at that price point. Certainly you would get folks like me who appreciate the presence of these forums (that may be a surprise to some people, but so be it) and the technology that goes into providing a fairly advanced forum experience, but who has never donated and doesn't immediately plan to, certainly not as long as the expectation is that those donations need to be monthly in nature. If the purpose is to discourage people from using the advanced but resource-consuming read states system (and indeed from participating and posting), then by all means keep the price of that system at a fairly usurious monthly fee. On the other hand, if the purpose is to encourage loyalty and to make a small amount of additional revenue to support maintenance of said resource-consuming system, please do consider a more reasonable annual fee, which I think a lot more people could get behind.
|
|
EatsTooMuchJam
Location: Minneapolis, MN Gender: Male
Squirty "Stickybuns" von Cherrypants
| | | | | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 38 on 12/6/2010 8:01 PM >
| | | Posted by Ian ETMJ, why on earth are you suggesting that this could be a cash grab? Well let's see... 36,000 accounts, and let's say that 1/4 of these are active - so 9,000 active accounts. Picking a random low number, let's say that 2% of these are willing to pony up five bucks a month for their readstates. I'd bet 180 people care enough. So that's $900/mo, or $10,800/yr. Hopefully enough to cover a DB server, but you never know... wouldn't want to slow down UER for the users, unless, of course, it's for a dancing Santa which.... you know... slows down UER for the users. Hey wait, maybe Premium members could opt-out of "UER Christmas"?
|
$10,800 would buy a server far more powerful than uer.ca would need. For that amount of money, you can get a 1U 12-core Westmere box with 72G of RAM and ~8T of internal disk (4x2T). I seem to recall that the current site runs on a Sun X2100 (2-core, up to 4G of RAM, 2 hard drives) unless Av has upgraded in the last few years.
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits |
|
EatsTooMuchJam
Location: Minneapolis, MN Gender: Male
Squirty "Stickybuns" von Cherrypants
| | | | | | Re: Forum Read States Change (those little circles) <Reply # 39 on 12/6/2010 8:04 PM >
| | | Posted by -MisfitStyle-
I'm not going to debate the technical merits of your argument (you bring up a number of good points), but opening with this almost made me ignore your entire post. Are you really suggesting that Yahoo-owned Flickr is a good metric for server costs? I'd imagine the number of Flickr Pro accounts pales in comparison to the number of free accounts, as on any site. Do you really think $25/year covers the hosting costs for more than 5 billion images? (http://blog.flickr.../09/19/5000000000/) No, a whole lot of that is covered by Yahoo, a benefit Av doesn't enjoy. But at 7 years and 4159 posts, why bother contributing anything to a site you enjoy for free?
|
You're right. I know absolutely nothing about profitability of websites and/or scaling therein. It has nothing to do with my daily job. And of course $25/year doesn't cover the hosting costs for 5,000,000,000 images. It almost certainly, however, covers the hosting costs for my <1,000 images reduced in resolution for posting on the web. "Flickr was acquired by Yahoo in March 2005, when Flickr was just on the border of becoming cash flow breakeven. According to Alexa, Flickr’s traffic is up >10X since the acquisition, so the company was able to extend its reach outside of its initial core user community." As an alternative, another suggestion could very well be to have an ad-supported variant of uer.ca using non-obtrusive google adsense-type ads tucked discretely away into a not-often-used corner of the screen. I could tolerate that.
"The large print giveth and the small print taketh away." -Tom Waits |
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 125 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 736991960 pages have been generated.
|
|