Infiltration
THEORY
Ethics
Observations
 
PRACTICE
Abandoned Sites
Boats
Churches
Drains/Catacombs
Hotels/Hospitals
Transit Tunnels
Utility Tunnels
Various
 
RESOURCES
Exploration Timeline
Infilnews
Infilspeak Dictionary
Usufruct Blog
Worldwide Links
Infiltration Forums home | search | login | register

Infiltration Forums > Archived UE Photo Critiques > Shoal Creek Storm Drains (Viewed 382 times)
wendigo 


location:
Pennsylvania
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | wendigo's Photos
Shoal Creek Storm Drains
< on 8/10/2008 5:05 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Some friends and I made this trek last month after reading about this on somebody's website. We brought a ton of lights and ended up using them in the scenes, which was kind of fun. I've never seen so many cockroaches before, and I hope to never see that many again.


105395.jpg (147 kb, 800x533)
click to view


105396.jpg (115 kb, 800x533)
click to view


105397.jpg (139 kb, 800x533)
click to view


105398.jpg (97 kb, 800x533)
click to view


105399.jpg (102 kb, 800x533)
click to view




wendigo 


location:
Pennsylvania
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | wendigo's Photos
Re: Shoal Creek Storm Drains
<Reply # 1 on 8/10/2008 5:15 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Whoops, it looks like everyone else is linking to external images rather than use the internal uploader. Is that the preferred method of displaying pictures?

Steed 


location:
Edmonton/Seoul
Gender: Male


Your Friendly Neighbourhood Race Traitor

Send Private Message | Send Email | Daehanmindecline
Re: Shoal Creek Storm Drains
<Reply # 2 on 8/11/2008 2:51 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I'd say, despite the recent upgrade, you're still better off hotlinking images from off site.

Audace 


Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Shoal Creek Storm Drains
<Reply # 3 on 8/11/2008 5:21 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I like the detail in these pictures. the only thing you might think about is how much light is necessary to convey the feel of the drains? when i think drain, i think dark. Lightpainting has a lot to offer in this regard so think carefully about how you use it. For example, a long exposure of someone walking down the tunnel with a light could make a great picture, especially with a wide-angle lens.

I like what you did with the first picture, it looks like the person is holding a burning torch. I would do a severe crop to emphasize him, and i thought it looked nice in greyscale.

This other picture has potential as well. take it or leave it:


wendigo 


location:
Pennsylvania
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | wendigo's Photos
Re: Shoal Creek Storm Drains
<Reply # 4 on 8/14/2008 5:37 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Audace
I like the detail in these pictures. the only thing you might think about is how much light is necessary to convey the feel of the drains? when i think drain, i think dark. Lightpainting has a lot to offer in this regard so think carefully about how you use it. For example, a long exposure of someone walking down the tunnel with a light could make a great picture, especially with a wide-angle lens.

You make a good point. I was intent on keeping the shutter open a bit longer to fill in my shadows with detail and I think I ended up losing a lot of the interesting contrast that you get from being in that environment. I'm sure I could take another pass at the pics to reintroduce some of that, but I'd rather it be something that's taken into consideration while actually taking the pictures.

Here's a link to the rest of the gallery:
http://photos.hess...lery/5418284_6ZoeM

Oryx 


location:
Who knows


:|

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Shoal Creek Storm Drains
<Reply # 5 on 8/23/2008 11:35 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Yeah way too much light. And I'd like the last one more if it wasn't tilted. Otherwise they're pretty cool.

Infiltration Forums > Archived UE Photo Critiques > Shoal Creek Storm Drains (Viewed 382 times)

Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 62 ms