Infiltration
THEORY
Ethics
Observations
 
PRACTICE
Abandoned Sites
Boats
Churches
Drains/Catacombs
Hotels/Hospitals
Transit Tunnels
Utility Tunnels
Various
 
RESOURCES
Exploration Timeline
Infilnews
Infilspeak Dictionary
Usufruct Blog
Worldwide Links
Infiltration Forums home | search | login | register

Infiltration Forums > Archived UE Photo Critiques > Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002 (Viewed 610 times)
Whittiker Owens 


location:
Denver CO
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | WhittikerOwens on flickr
Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
< on 6/29/2007 3:30 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 


Whittiker Owens:
http://www.flickr....os/whittikerowens/
https://www.instagram.com/kameraface42/
COWBOY695 


location:
NORTHERN CALI ( NO NOT SAN FRANSISCO)
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 1 on 6/29/2007 1:00 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Beauty meets the beast i like it. The Mill looks like something out of a science fiction movie. Good Pic

182 lbs of sad 


location:
in the gym training my ass off!
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 2 on 6/29/2007 1:21 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
work on your focusing

Fight like a man
Bleed like a man
Die like a man
Whittiker Owens 


location:
Denver CO
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | WhittikerOwens on flickr
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 3 on 6/29/2007 2:40 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by 508explore
work on your focusing


yeah...i know. i've since tried to reshoot that and its never the same conditions. maybe this weekend. i'm going down there.

Whittiker Owens:
http://www.flickr....os/whittikerowens/
https://www.instagram.com/kameraface42/
Senseriffic 


location:
Elizabeth, NJ


I am drowning in a digital sea

Send Private Message | Send Email | 
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 4 on 6/29/2007 4:03 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I love the contrast, lemme know how it is, I wanna go there but I heard its really risky due to the "construction"

The blind lead the blind into bottomless pits,
Still we smile and deny that we're cursed.
But of all our iniquities ignorance may be the worst.
Contagion 


location:
Phila., PA
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 5 on 6/29/2007 8:13 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I agree with the focusing problems.
The only answer i could have for that is your lens needs help.
I know that certain Nikon SLR's/lenses cannot focus to infinity due to some sort of technicality, that may be your problem. I could be wrong, however.
This was shot on 35mm, no?

EDIT: Clarity, sort of.
[last edit 6/29/2007 8:13 PM by Contagion - edited 1 times]

JustINSANE 


location:
NJ/Boston
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | AIM Message
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 6 on 6/29/2007 8:55 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
heard its mostly gone i don't know if this is true though

"brocore"
182 lbs of sad 


location:
in the gym training my ass off!
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 7 on 6/29/2007 10:25 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Contagion

I know that certain Nikon SLR's/lenses cannot focus to infinity due to some sort of technicality, that may be your problem. I could be wrong, however.


thats because nikon=crap, well in my opinion im bias

Fight like a man
Bleed like a man
Die like a man
Contagion 


location:
Phila., PA
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 8 on 6/29/2007 10:47 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by 508explore


thats because nikon=crap, well in my opinion im bias


Agreed. That is why i made my statement.

Whittiker Owens 


location:
Denver CO
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | WhittikerOwens on flickr
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 9 on 6/30/2007 1:24 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
the focus issue here is 80% intentional, 20% lack of insight. i could decide between the flowers and the furnace. i ended up giving up and doing neither - a terrible idea. if i had a tripod at the time, i would have stopped down and slowed down my shutter - greatly reducing the issue or possibly solving it all together

Whittiker Owens:
http://www.flickr....os/whittikerowens/
https://www.instagram.com/kameraface42/
GWarren 


location:
Tree Town, Michigan
Gender: Male


Walking the Croooked Beat

Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 10 on 6/30/2007 5:37 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Pretty nice shot, the focus a nice idea but the focus shouls have been on the foreground as well
The contrast and colors are great

Contagion 


location:
Phila., PA
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 11 on 6/30/2007 10:53 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Whittiker Owens
the focus issue here is 80% intentional, 20% lack of insight. i could decide between the flowers and the furnace. i ended up giving up and doing neither - a terrible idea. if i had a tripod at the time, i would have stopped down and slowed down my shutter - greatly reducing the issue or possibly solving it all together


Well, perhaps somewhere between an f/5.6 or even f/8 would be interesting, if you focused on the flowers.
If you're going to focus on the furnace, i'd recommend f/11 or maybe even f/16. Never do f/22, the clarity can tend to drop off and your colors can and will get fucky on you.

Ensoleille 


location:
((Westchester)), NY
Gender: Female




Send Private Message | Send Email | Add to ICQ | AIM Message | 
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 12 on 7/13/2007 5:27 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
I think part of the appeal for me towards this photo is the lack of focus on either flowers nor factory. I really think it would've taken away from the flowers or factory if you had intentionally made the foreground or background in focus. However, i would've increased the depth of field a smidgen. Whatev. I agree with GWarren about the contrast and colors being right on too.


I will also stand to disagree with the Nikon-bashing.

zenjaphy 


location:
Buffalo, NY
Gender: Male




Send Private Message | Send Email | AIM Message | Rust Belt Rising Photography
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 13 on 7/13/2007 7:48 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 

I know that certain Nikon SLR's/lenses cannot focus to infinity due to some sort of technicality, that may be your problem. I could be wrong, however.


It was a problem with older super telephoto lenses that used ED glass. Guessing it's not the issue here.

Air 


location:
Canada




Send Private Message | Send Email
Re: Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002
<Reply # 14 on 7/14/2007 1:21 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
 
Posted by Contagion
I agree with the focusing problems.
The only answer i could have for that is your lens needs help.
I know that certain Nikon SLR's/lenses cannot focus to infinity due to some sort of technicality, that may be your problem. I could be wrong, however.
This was shot on 35mm, no?

EDIT: Clarity, sort of.


My 20mm would have to focus past the infinity mark. It was a misalignment issue tho. Look into it if its still under warranty.

"The extraordinary beauty of things that fail." - Heinrich von Kleist
Infiltration Forums > Archived UE Photo Critiques > Bethlehm Steel...this was in is 2002 (Viewed 610 times)

Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 109 ms