|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
970 online
Server Time:
2024-05-10 16:48:37
|
|
|
kjohnnytarr
Location: Columbia, Missouri Gender: Male
Team Asbestos: CoMO
| | | I don't need critiques so much as advice: First roll of film! < on 4/18/2007 5:27 PM >
| | | So, this is the "best" of my first roll of film ever. I think they're good-ish. I'm more interested in advice than critiques here, if you please. THANKS!
[last edit 4/18/2007 5:36 PM by kjohnnytarr - edited 1 times]
It seemed like a good idea at the time... |
|
argonian
Location: Toronto, ON Gender: Female
"Now with added cats!"
| | Re: I don't need critiques so much as advice: First roll of film! <Reply # 1 on 4/18/2007 5:46 PM >
| | | What kind of film are you using? Maybe you want to try something like Fujichrome 64T Type II Professional or Kodak Ektachrome 64T.
Que pasa, baby? |
|
mortimer
Location: teronno
| | | Re: I don't need critiques so much as advice: First roll of film! <Reply # 2 on 4/18/2007 8:07 PM >
| | | Posted by argonian What kind of film are you using? Maybe you want to try something like Fujichrome 64T Type II Professional or Kodak Ektachrome 64T.
|
Or whatever you're using + blue filter. All of these are very yellow, except for the two that are green, you'll want a magenta filter for green streetlights. Some are not quite sharp, and a couple have the sort of grain that is usually caused by underexposure. What's your setup? It's hard to hand over advice without knowing what camera, lens, tripod, other equipment, etc. you're using. Most of the problems here may be caused by bad 1-hour processing/printing/scanning, are you scanning these yourself? If so, scanning prints or negs? Trying to fix things with photoshop or leaving as is? More details will help. By the way, I like the bike with the rocket-riding chalk t-rex.
yep. |
|
argonian
Location: Toronto, ON Gender: Female
"Now with added cats!"
| | Re: I don't need critiques so much as advice: First roll of film! <Reply # 3 on 4/18/2007 8:14 PM >
| | | filters are a much better idea. i rescind my advice.
Que pasa, baby? |
|
Air
Location: Canada
| | Re: I don't need critiques so much as advice: First roll of film! <Reply # 4 on 4/18/2007 8:20 PM >
| | | I just got one of those blue filters for $5. They are great, just make sure you get the lightest one, as there are three grades. That said they still seem abnormally yellow, what film did you use?
"The extraordinary beauty of things that fail." - Heinrich von Kleist |
|
mortimer
Location: teronno
| | | Re: I don't need critiques so much as advice: First roll of film! <Reply # 5 on 4/18/2007 8:28 PM >
| | | Posted by Air 33 just make sure you get the lightest one, as there are three grades.
|
Depends what you're shooting. In an indoor tungsten situation like, say, a shopping mall, the lightest grade would be fine. In large spaces lit by small, dim bulbs, like a factory with a single bulb lit up every 50 feet or so, the darkest blue filters will still leave a bit of a yellow cast on slide film.
Post by argonian filters are a much better idea. i rescind my advice. |
Tungsten film is always better than adding extra glass, but with exposure issues and with a film beginner, I'd say avoiding slide would be the less frustrating choice.
yep. |
|
kjohnnytarr
Location: Columbia, Missouri Gender: Male
Team Asbestos: CoMO
| | | Re: I don't need critiques so much as advice: First roll of film! <Reply # 6 on 4/19/2007 5:23 PM >
| | | Post by argonian What kind of film are you using? Maybe you want to try something like Fujichrome 64T Type II Professional or Kodak Ektachrome 64T. |
Standard Fuji, 1600 speed.
Post by mortimer Or whatever you're using + blue filter. All of these are very yellow, except for the two that are green, you'll want a magenta filter for green streetlights. Some are not quite sharp, and a couple have the sort of grain that is usually caused by underexposure. |
Yeah, I have some Conkin filters I haven't ever used yet, I think I'll break them out
Post by mortimer What's your setup? It's hard to hand over advice without knowing what camera, lens, tripod, other equipment, etc. you're using. Most of the problems here may be caused by bad 1-hour processing/printing/scanning, are you scanning these yourself? If so, scanning prints or negs? Trying to fix things with photoshop or leaving as is? More details will help. By the way, I like the bike with the rocket-riding chalk t-rex. |
My camera is a Pentax, seen here: http://www.uer.ca/...rrpage=1&pp#post11 Tripod is a budget Promax, but I like it OK. It wasn't a 1 hour processing, I got it developed at the local camera shop. I trust them, so it's not their bad, it's mine. And I just had them put on a disk, so no scanning. I did a bit of touch up in iPhoto. And thanks, I feel like a proud daddy about my bike. ---------------------------------- So, I'm going to use a slower speed film on my next shoot with this camera, and practice in drains. I don't think I'll get into filters until next time I shoot above ground. Thanks all.
It seemed like a good idea at the time... |
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 109 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 741268252 pages have been generated.
|
|