|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
|
ColdWater
Location: boston Gender: Male
| | | Keyhole VS. Google Maps? < on 5/3/2005 11:42 PM >
| | | Which is the best? If keyhole is better, could someone get me an image of 42.07676, -71.26393? Preferably as close up as possible.
(Is it legal to ask for that?)
|
|
nd31
| | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 1 on 5/4/2005 4:19 AM >
| | | Didn't google buy keyhole maps?
|
|
ColdWater
Location: boston Gender: Male
| | | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 3 on 5/6/2005 7:54 PM >
| | | My coordinates must have been off, It was supposed to be over a mental institution
|
|
morgansteph
Location: Washington DC Gender: Female
| | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 4 on 5/7/2005 12:02 AM >
| | | I'd have to say keyhole. I spelunked the 10$ (or whatever it is) fee to use it for a year, and I do use it religiously.
"Have you ever tagged a location before?" "Yes, I have. But I also used to shit my diapers... Things change." |
|
Brooks
Location: Fall River Ma Gender: Male
| | | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 5 on 5/19/2005 4:06 AM >
| | | Is keyhole really that good? google zooms up really good in my area,I can see the colors of cars
|
|
morgansteph
Location: Washington DC Gender: Female
| | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 6 on 5/19/2005 4:27 AM >
| | | I think so. It's got a trillion features, and unlike WorldWind, it actually has images for everywhere (might not be high resolution).
"Have you ever tagged a location before?" "Yes, I have. But I also used to shit my diapers... Things change." |
|
gothstone
Location: Blue Springs, MO near Kansas City Gender: Male
| | | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 7 on 5/19/2005 5:59 PM >
| | | I've used keyhole, and it worked very well with extreamly high resolution. Google maps looks like the same thing, but I can't zoom in as far. Just tried world wind, I'm not impressed. The resolution is awfull. Has anyone made a program to pull images from all these sources yet? Are there any other progs to try?
2 + 2 = 5 for extremely large values of 2 |
|
djdrew
Location: Raleigh, NC Gender: Male
-=djdrew=-
| | | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 8 on 5/24/2005 10:41 AM >
| | | Hay I would use google maps all the way guys. It has a relay nice interface, and it s google. I dont much like map quest i dont think they give good directions, and I am a relay big fan of google! *gmail rocks *
-=djdrew=- |
|
Beryl Not as fluffy as Av!
Location: Germany Gender: Male
Uncle Beryl
| | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 9 on 5/24/2005 10:51 AM >
| | | Posted by djdrew Hay I would use google maps all the way guys. It has a relay nice interface, and it s google. I dont much like map quest i dont think they give good directions, and I am a relay big fan of google! *gmail rocks *
|
Heh. Except that Google owns both. If you don't know both sides to a discussion, it's impossible to contribute. And, to be on topic, I've been using Keyhole all week and like it a lot more than Google Maps or WorldWind. [last edit 5/24/2005 10:56 AM by Beryl - edited 1 times]
Licentious acrimonious puer æternus. Libertine. |
|
Louie
| | | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 10 on 5/24/2005 5:13 PM >
| | | For me, Keyhole and WorldWind give me the exact same images, except WorldWind has topographics. So maybe it's just the DC area, but I'm sticking with WorldWind. Louie [last edit 5/24/2005 5:14 PM by Louie - edited 1 times]
|
|
Chainsaw This member has been banned. See the banlist for more information.
Location: Underground, Colorado Gender: Male
| | | Re: Keyhole VS. Google Maps? <Reply # 11 on 5/24/2005 5:47 PM >
| | | MSN says they are coming out with their own player - it will include 45 degree angle shots as well - http://blog.search...blog/050523-125208
Quid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur. |
|
|
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 218 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 739422757 pages have been generated.
|
|