|
|
There seems to have been a call for this in the Photo Critiques Forum so I stepped up to the plate and created one.
This board is intended for serious critique and constructive criticism. If you post critique, please, take the time to type out a real thoughtful response not, "lol i like em!1!!"
There are a lot of fantastic photographers on UER let's hear from them
Hope everyone enjoys the forum!
Rules are simple and as follows:
THIS FORUM IS NOT FOR DOUCHEBAGGERY: Harsh criticism is quite different than being an outright shit head. Try to remember that folks here come to this forum for a reason, to improve and to learn. Let's try to facilitate that by not being a bunch of apes and actually contributing something substantial to the community.
PLEASE KEEP IT ON TOPIC: no image macros, flame wars or blatant trolling will be tolerated.
PLEASE NUMBER YOUR PHOTOS: For the ease of those offering critique, if you post more than one frame in a thread, please number them.
PLEASE MAKE SURE YOUR CRITIQUES HAVE SUBSTANCE: This is intended to be a userboard that folks can learn from. If you take the time to tell a poster you like or do not like their photo make sure you tell them WHY so that they can take your critique into consideration next time they shoot.
[last edit 3/4/2008 6:14 PM by Felonious Monk - edited 6 times]
"i've been trying for almost a year to get Colfax to one of my events to give it some credibility" - bfinan0
|
Add a poll to this thread
This thread is one of your Favourites. Click to make normal.Click to make this thread a Favourite.
| This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 66 ms
|
|
Ethics
