|
Poll Question: do you have a digital camera | Total Votes: | 26 | 1. yes, normal cammeras have too many limmits | 7 | 26.92 % |
| 2. no their too expensive | 1 | 3.85 % |
| 3. no i have a high end film cammera | 2 | 7.69 % |
| 4. yes but i don't use it much | 7 | 26.92 % |
| 5. i have both and use them equally | 9 | 34.62 % |
|
|
i know most people have changed from normal cammeras to digital. but me, i use a good old film camera. i don't even use that much. i usually use a disposal which lasts me a year. seriosly who takes so many pictures to justify spending $150-thousands on a digital camera?i know that expanding the picture for a regular camera doesn't make it go all blurry or pixilated but thats just my point of view. who else here doesn't own a digital cammera?
maker of most useless thread | |
Are we talking still image or moving image? If it's still, I'm not sure this is in the right thread. Either way, I'm straddling the divide. I use a digital camera as well as my film camera for still images, and I use a miniDV Pro-sumer camera as well as a super-8.
It's a drag, it's a bore, it's really such a pitty To be lookin' at the board, not lookin' at the city. | |
I have a digital rebel, but I use my other cameras much more frequently. However, I only have the kit lens, and when I have money and upgrade, I may be more inclined to use it verus film.
| |
I use your average over-the-counter Canon zr60. Compact, unobtrusive, good image quality, good audio, and it converts digital to analogue. I picked up a 9hr battery, and a wide angle adapter. Nice little rig.
"The truth is knowable. But probably not, ever, incontrovertible." --Don DeLillo PICS | |
I have a Nikon D200 but I also have a 35mm I use not as much but sometimes.
|
Add a poll to this thread This thread is one of your Favourites. Click to make normal.Click to make this thread a Favourite.
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 62 ms
|
|