Infiltration
THEORY
Ethics
Observations
 
PRACTICE
Abandoned Sites
Boats
Churches
Drains/Catacombs
Hotels/Hospitals
Transit Tunnels
Utility Tunnels
Various
 
RESOURCES
Exploration Timeline
Infilnews
Infilspeak Dictionary
Usufruct Blog
Worldwide Links
Infiltration Forums home | search | login | register

Reply
Infiltration Forums > UE Photo Critiques > Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?(Viewed 3158 times)
goon1 location:
Atlanta & Bay Area
 
 |  | 
Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
< on 7/17/2020 9:16 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I use the Nikon D3400 and recently got the Nikkor 35mm lens for the f/1.8 (I really enjoy low light photography and wanted to upgrade from my kit lens's f/4).

I was playing around with it at an abandoned daycare and set the shutter speed to 1/4000-2000 and set the aperture to f/5-10. I was hoping this would simulate the natural-looking grain effect that film has, but I'm not sure if I replicated the effect well or just took lower quality and crappier photos.

Please critique away. Any advice on how to simulate the grain/vintage/film effect is greatly appreciated!


Before I started experimenting with the aperture:

DSC_0448 by goon1 !, on Flickr

DSC_0466 by goon1 !, on Flickr


After I started experimenting with the aperture:

DSC_0451 by goon1 !, on Flickr

Version 2 by goon1 !, on Flickr

DSC_0459 by goon1 !, on Flickr

DSC_0460 by goon1 !, on Flickr





randomesquephoto   |  | 
Re: Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
<Reply # 1 on 7/18/2020 7:27 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
looks better before you messed with them



RIP Blackhawk
Steed location:
Edmonton/Seoul
 
 |  |  | Daehanmindecline
Re: Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
<Reply # 2 on 7/18/2020 1:55 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
You should set your camera to aperture priority. That way you control the aperture so the shutter speed adjusts automatically.

I think the first one looks like it tells a story and I could see it being used in a news article about the closure, but the others don't really show much. The second one needs better composition because of the shape of the tarp. Overall I don't think having the fence in the way looks good.



goon1 location:
Atlanta & Bay Area
 
 |  | 
Re: Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
<Reply # 3 on 7/18/2020 3:54 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by randomesquephoto
looks better before you messed with them


Looking back on it again today, I agree.



goon1 location:
Atlanta & Bay Area
 
 |  | 
Re: Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
<Reply # 4 on 7/18/2020 3:56 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by Steed
You should set your camera to aperture priority. That way you control the aperture so the shutter speed adjusts automatically.

I think the first one looks like it tells a story and I could see it being used in a news article about the closure, but the others don't really show much. The second one needs better composition because of the shape of the tarp. Overall I don't think having the fence in the way looks good.


I agree. I was about to hop the fence so I could get a better angle for the shot, but then I saw a security camera start flashing and I thought it'd be a better idea to come back later when I didn't already flash my face and license plate to the camera.



ryanpics location:
Central Va
 
 |  |  | 
Re: Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
<Reply # 5 on 7/19/2020 5:01 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I hate to sound like a film purist, but I feel like adding grain or purposely running your ISO too high for the look is kinda dumb. I've never shot film and I would love to try though. I personally like to try and get my shots as clean as I can while still matching how it looked in real life. It's good to experiment with stuff like this though.



goon1 location:
Atlanta & Bay Area
 
 |  | 
Re: Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
<Reply # 6 on 7/19/2020 9:05 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by ryanpics
I hate to sound like a film purist, but I feel like adding grain or purposely running your ISO too high for the look is kinda dumb. I've never shot film and I would love to try though. I personally like to try and get my shots as clean as I can while still matching how it looked in real life. It's good to experiment with stuff like this though.


I appreciate your idea (and the ISO was sky high on these shots). I think I'm going to keep the camera work pure for now and keep using my disposable if I want a shot to have a more retro aesthetic.



eternal-star location:
Florida
 
 |  |  | flickr
Re: Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
<Reply # 7 on 2/11/2023 4:40 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I personally think they look awesome. a nostalgic sense of distortion. Although I would suggest that maybe using real film or a good grain preset in photoshop might be a more efficient/pleasing way to achieve this effect rather than just bumping up the iso. I wouldn’t give up experimenting with this vibe though, one of my favorite things to do is make photos look “bad” on purpose to give it a more mysterious and distant feeling.


[last edit 2/11/2023 4:40 PM by eternal-star - edited 1 times]

dundertits location:
at the beginning
 
 |  | 
Re: Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?
<Reply # 8 on 2/11/2023 10:55 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
It depends on how you want to use the bokeh really I love me some F1.0

50mmF1.0 by gungyduo, on Flickr



Kabbalah is an undramatic tradition that requires great patience and stability. One of the reasons for this tempo is that everyone has to mature his potential gradually and thoroughly at his natural pace. In this way his life's work unfolds at the right moment in his own and the cosmos's time.
Z.B.S. Halevi -- Kabbalah
Infiltration Forums > UE Photo Critiques > Cool Aesthetic or Just Bad Quality?(Viewed 3158 times)
Reply

Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.

Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 62 ms