|
What reasons are some sites available to the public and others classified as full member? I understand protecting the sites fully, but what sort of things make the difference between the classification of these two types of sites?
|
|
Posted by AKexp What reasons are some sites available to the public and others classified as full member? I understand protecting the sites fully, but what sort of things make the difference between the classification of these two types of sites?
|
The person who creates the DB entry makes that decision. When a location is marked Demolished, it automatically becomes publicly viewable.
In order to use your head, you have to go out of your mind. |
|
its a pride thing, sense of accomplishment, ego
http://www.flickr....rescueme1060/sets/ |
|
I make locations public if they are demolished or they want you to visit. For instance, one was an eviction site that had a sit-in protest in one building and held concerts.
|
|
After several people have been prosecuted for showing off locations online, I made most of the locations I post here FM only to protect me not those sites. There is still some degree of privacy and anonymity on UER 1. its Canadian and I only post sites in the U.S. 2. I trust the site owner not to divulge my identity 3. the FM system keeps a lot. not all but a large number of unwelcome eyes off my content I don't need likes or followers so I steer clear of social media like Fakebook and Instagrunt .
[last edit 6/9/2020 1:01 AM by Explorer Zero - edited 1 times]
|
|
Don't let it bother you. It doesn't bother me. I'm lone wolf and don't need a silly title to make me feel like an adventurer. If the site wants to add new abandoned places to it's depleted listing then a mod can ask me for it but don't go out of your way for anyone for a little badge lol Now get out there and explore 😏
I'm a lone explorer because I hate people. |