Infiltration
THEORY
Ethics
Observations
 
PRACTICE
Abandoned Sites
Boats
Churches
Drains/Catacombs
Hotels/Hospitals
Transit Tunnels
Utility Tunnels
Various
 
RESOURCES
Exploration Timeline
Infilnews
Infilspeak Dictionary
Usufruct Blog
Worldwide Links
Infiltration Forums home | search | login | register

Reply
Infiltration Forums > Rookie Forum > Public Locations vs. Full Member Locations(Viewed 1657 times)
AKexp location:
Fairbanks, AK
 
 |  | 
Public Locations vs. Full Member Locations
< on 6/8/2020 1:45 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
What reasons are some sites available to the public and others classified as full member? I understand protecting the sites fully, but what sort of things make the difference between the classification of these two types of sites?



Radio2600 location:
On the Road to Wellville
 
 |  | 
Re: Public Locations vs. Full Member Locations
<Reply # 1 on 6/8/2020 3:24 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by AKexp
What reasons are some sites available to the public and others classified as full member? I understand protecting the sites fully, but what sort of things make the difference between the classification of these two types of sites?


The person who creates the DB entry makes that decision.

When a location is marked Demolished, it automatically becomes publicly viewable.



In order to use your head, you have to go out of your mind.
RescueMe1060 location:
San Francisco
 
 |  | 
Re: Public Locations vs. Full Member Locations
<Reply # 2 on 6/8/2020 3:46 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
its a pride thing, sense of accomplishment, ego



http://www.flickr....rescueme1060/sets/
Steed location:
Edmonton/Seoul
 
 |  |  | Daehanmindecline
Re: Public Locations vs. Full Member Locations
<Reply # 3 on 6/8/2020 4:49 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I make locations public if they are demolished or they want you to visit. For instance, one was an eviction site that had a sit-in protest in one building and held concerts.



Explorer Zero   |  |  | 
Re: Public Locations vs. Full Member Locations
<Reply # 4 on 6/8/2020 10:29 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
After several people have been prosecuted for showing off locations online, I made most of the locations I post here FM only to protect me not those sites.

There is still some degree of privacy and anonymity on UER

1. its Canadian and I only post sites in the U.S.

2. I trust the site owner not to divulge my identity

3. the FM system keeps a lot. not all but a large number of unwelcome eyes off my content

I don't need likes or followers so I steer clear of social media like Fakebook and Instagrunt .


[last edit 6/9/2020 1:01 AM by Explorer Zero - edited 1 times]

HornetWrath location:
San Antonio
 
 |  | 
Re: Public Locations vs. Full Member Locations
<Reply # 5 on 8/11/2020 11:27 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Don't let it bother you. It doesn't bother me. I'm lone wolf and don't need a silly title to make me feel like an adventurer. If the site wants to add new abandoned places to it's depleted listing then a mod can ask me for it but don't go out of your way for anyone for a little badge lol

Now get out there and explore 😏



I'm a lone explorer because I hate people.
Infiltration Forums > Rookie Forum > Public Locations vs. Full Member Locations(Viewed 1657 times)
Reply

Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.

Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 46 ms