How is it this member shares an account and is still a Full Member? I thought the rules said that you cannot share an account with anyone? Is there a Favorites UER Group? Is there rule breaking here with Bonnie and Clyde?
ignoring the question, why? The rules say no sharing accounts is allowed yet they are permitted to share? As for your accusations, prove it. RomainPP had a warmer welcome by the way.
Posted by MidPlainsDrifter ignoring the question, why? The rules say no sharing accounts is allowed yet they are permitted to share? As for your accusations, prove it. RomainPP had a warmer welcome by the way.
Posted by MidPlainsDrifter How is it this member shares an account and is still a Full Member? I thought the rules said that you cannot share an account with anyone? Is there a Favorites UER Group? Is there rule breaking here with Bonnie and Clyde?
You have been on the forum nine days and you are pitching a fit about a 10 year member? Don't you think it would have been taken care of a long time ago if it were an issue. If someone chooses the name Rocky and Bullwinkle, does that make him two people?
If you have an ax to grind, take it up with the admins. Looks to me like you are just stirring sh*t.
Abby Normal
[last edit 3/14/2018 5:14 PM by Abby Normal - edited 1 times] "Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem." Ronald Reagan
Like Abby said... B&C have been here for over a decade, and they've been upfront about who they are. It is probable that the no-sharing-of-accounts rule came into effect some time after their arrival, and they were grandfathered-in.
More importantly... more-substantial members have not complained about their status. This is because they contribute meaningfully to the core-intent of this community, and have not abused their account in the sort of way the no-sharing rule was meant to target. (These rules obviously came about due to specific incidents.)
I can understand your confusion at seeing what seems to be an obvious violation of the rules that you have to abide by. But two things are helpful to know:
1) UER is an old community with an unusually persistent membership (mostly because the UE community is about a person's general reputation and/or personal connections that can take awhile to build). Attacking an old member is a bad idea... mostly because they're old members for a reason.
2) Don't try to play lawyer with the community rules. The rules are there to prevent recurrences of bad behavior, but mostly people end up going by what's right-or-wrong. Believe-it-or-not, UER is a highly ethics-bound community. Even if the rules don't cover all of it, the community will judge you anyways... so just be cool. Do right, and people will like you. Do wrong... well...
You would be advised to not see this as the typical sort of Internet forum. It isn't, because few people are actually anonymous: most everyone knows someone. Best to treat it like a real-life community.
Shall we reset the agenda?
Edit: now looking back at your short posting history, it's plainly obvious that you are no noob to this community. So therefore I think RescueMe1060's and siper's sentiment is more appropriate.
Mid pains drifter it’s easy for me to spot these new profiles you keep making, going on 4times banned now. Keep them coming and I’ll keep sniffing you out.
I can understand your confusion at seeing what seems to be an obvious violation of the rules that you have to abide by. But two things are helpful to know:
1) UER is an old community with an unusually persistent membership (mostly because the UE community is about a person's general reputation and/or personal connections that can take awhile to build). Attacking an old member is a bad idea... mostly because they're old members for a reason.
2) Don't try to play lawyer with the community rules. The rules are there to prevent recurrences of bad behavior, but mostly people end up going by what's right-or-wrong. Believe-it-or-not, UER is a highly ethics-bound community. Even if the rules don't cover all of it, the community will judge you anyways... so just be cool. Do right, and people will like you. Do wrong... well...
Posted by MidPlainsDrifter I can understand your confusion at seeing what seems to be an obvious violation of the rules that you have to abide by. But two things are helpful to know:
1) UER is an old community with an unusually persistent membership (mostly because the UE community is about a person's general reputation and/or personal connections that can take awhile to build). Attacking an old member is a bad idea... mostly because they're old members for a reason.
2) Don't try to play lawyer with the community rules. The rules are there to prevent recurrences of bad behavior, but mostly people end up going by what's right-or-wrong. Believe-it-or-not, UER is a highly ethics-bound community. Even if the rules don't cover all of it, the community will judge you anyways... so just be cool. Do right, and people will like you. Do wrong... well...
I really haven't been following whatever dispute with this person because it seems unentertaining, but did they just (1) accuse a well-established member (well, two members) of breaking site rules, and (2) get exposed for breaking site rules themself?
Sounds like a textbook definition of someone we don't want on this site or in our communities.
Posted by bonnie&clyde Built in the 1930s, this sprawling property spans over 100 wooded acres.
click to view
The majestic face of this hospital was a beacon of hope to the ill and injured for many years.
click to view
Sadly, it did not escape the fate that several hospitals built around the same time succumbed to. Deemed seismically unfit, it was slated for closure a few years ago.
click to view
When the last of the patients had been moved it was one woman's task to make the closing announcement over the hospital's intercom. She had been born there 30 years prior. She made her announcement, turned out the lights and the old hospital sighed after 80 years of service.
click to view
The county took possession of the property and is now desperate to unload the sizeable chunk of land that costs over a half million a year to maintain in it's current condition. (Running electricity, gushing water pipes and security probably the biggest factors in that figure).
1.
click to view
2.
click to view
3.
click to view
4.
click to view
5.
click to view
6.
click to view
7.
click to view
8.
click to view
9.
click to view
10.
click to view
11.
click to view
12.
click to view
13.
click to view
14.
click to view
15.
click to view
16.
click to view
17.
click to view
18.
click to view
19.
click to view
20.
click to view
21.
click to view
22.
click to view
23.
click to view
24.
click to view
The graveyard next door, overgrown and choked with poison oak, has graves dated back from the mid 1800s to the early 60s
click to view
All pics taken with cell phone
Has anyone explored this spot recently???
I just want to explore places my own family and friends wouldn't.
Ethics
