|
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. Not urbex, but feedback still appreciated.
6.
|
|
I really like the subject matter of 1 and 2. The light coming from the left on 1 is somewhat distracting, and the contrast could be raised a little. 2 is great, but it's extremely grainy; try using a tripod and a lower shutter speed to keep your ISO down under 800. The lighting in 3 is a little strange, but it's a nice shot regardless; it would probably look good with someone in it too if you're into that. 4 is great-well composed, and I love the shape of the tunnel that you can see by looking at the support. The light gives it a sort of subject and falls on the walls in an interesting way. 5 is also very grainy, but I don't know enough about star photography to give you any useful advice. I'm not a huge fan of the super wide angle look of 6, but that's a matter of taste. How exactly did you illuminate the subject there?
"If a wise man disputes with a fool, he may rage or laugh but can have no peace."
Prv 29:9 |
|
Posted by OkapisRule
I really like the subject matter of 1 and 2. The light coming from the left on 1 is somewhat distracting, and the contrast could be raised a little. 2 is great, but it's extremely grainy; try using a tripod and a lower shutter speed to keep your ISO down under 800. The lighting in 3 is a little strange, but it's a nice shot regardless; it would probably look good with someone in it too if you're into that. 4 is great-well composed, and I love the shape of the tunnel that you can see by looking at the support. The light gives it a sort of subject and falls on the walls in an interesting way. 5 is also very grainy, but I don't know enough about star photography to give you any useful advice. I'm not a huge fan of the super wide angle look of 6, but that's a matter of taste. How exactly did you illuminate the subject there?
|
Thanks for the feedback! Number 6 was done by tracing around myself with a little red light.
|
|
Posted by cedzurbex
Number 6 was done by tracing around myself with a little red light.
|
What do you mean? Did you hold a red penlight and wave it around in the shape of your body during a long exposure shot, or did you wrap yourself in a string of red lights? Or did you use some other method?
I don't mean to interrogate you, it's just that you've piqued my curiosity with that unique photo.
"Sorry, I didn't know I'm not supposed to be here," he said, knowing full well he wasn't supposed to be there.
|
|
Posted by Aran
What do you mean? Did you hold a red penlight and wave it around in the shape of your body during a long exposure shot, or did you wrap yourself in a string of red lights? Or did you use some other method?
I don't mean to interrogate you, it's just that you've piqued my curiosity with that unique photo.
|
Yeah i just waved it around in the shape of my body.
|
|
So did you trace around your body with the light like you would trace yourself with a marker laying on paper, or did you just draw a shape that looked like your body?
"If a wise man disputes with a fool, he may rage or laugh but can have no peace."
Prv 29:9 |
|
Posted by OkapisRule
So did you trace around your body with the light like you would trace yourself with a marker laying on paper
|
Yeah
|
|
These are pretty awesome shots. I especially like the milky way shot. What Kind of camera/ lens are you using?
Let's Go Places |
|
Posted by YotaMan20
These are pretty awesome shots. I especially like the milky way shot. What Kind of camera/ lens are you using?
|
Cheers! I use a Sony a35, most of the shots are taken with a Tamron 18-200mm, but the really wide angle ones are a Rokinon fisheye de-fished in Lightroom.
|
|
You should get a prime or two! You could play around with some old mf ones before committing to buying a more expensive one.
"If a wise man disputes with a fool, he may rage or laugh but can have no peace."
Prv 29:9 |
|
Posted by OkapisRule
You should get a prime or two! You could play around with some old mf ones before committing to buying a more expensive one.
|
Yeah I have a 50mm and I love it! I mainly just use it for "normal" photography though, and abandoned houses.
I am thinking about buying a prime 10mm, but I don't know if I can justify it...
|
|
Posted by cedzurbex
Yeah I have a 50mm and I love it! I mainly just use it for "normal" photography though, and abandoned houses.
I am thinking about buying a prime 10mm, but I don't know if I can justify it...
|
Yeah, everyone needs a "nifty fifty". I've never really been into super wide angle though. I think at that range it's better to get a zoom, like a 10-24 or something, since you don't really need to worry too much about max aperture when it's that wide.
"If a wise man disputes with a fool, he may rage or laugh but can have no peace."
Prv 29:9 |
|
Solid pics but so much sensor and sharpening noise, try lower ISO and longer exposure. Watch out for over-processing too.
http://www.flickr....otos/c_rouge/sets/ |
|
I've been here. you have beautiful photos. you don't need to edit them. Thats the best compliment you could be given hope you take it gracefully  !
Masculine Dora the Explorer |
Ethics
