Infiltration
THEORY
Ethics
Observations
 
PRACTICE
Abandoned Sites
Boats
Churches
Drains/Catacombs
Hotels/Hospitals
Transit Tunnels
Utility Tunnels
Various
 
RESOURCES
Exploration Timeline
Infilnews
Infilspeak Dictionary
Usufruct Blog
Worldwide Links
Infiltration Forums home | search | login | register

Reply
Infiltration Forums > UE Photo Critiques > Critique(Viewed 2163 times)
Conrad2   |  | 
Critique
< on 2/23/2015 8:47 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Any critique appreciated,

1.



2.



3.



4.



5.





Astro
Usually naked
 
location:
The Delta Quadrant
 
 |  | 
Re: Critique
<Reply # 1 on 2/23/2015 8:49 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
The first two, I wish the sky wasn't so bland and blown out, it takes away from
them . the second one is cool, though.

The fifth one has too much dead space in it. Like, nothing leads you to anything and it's mostly just...boring. You've got the cool cloud effects. After that...there's nothing interesting. You can't even tell what the things in the photo are.






[02:33:56] <Valkyre> Astro your whole life is ruled by the sentence ' life is better without clothes on'
[22:16:00] <DSomms> it was normal until astro got here
Astro: Patron Saint of Drains
Conrad2   |  | 
Re: Critique
<Reply # 2 on 2/23/2015 8:52 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Cheers, I defiantly follow what your saying about the dead space, would there be anyway to spice the first 2 up post processing or just take the shots on a sunnier day? Thanks for your feedback.



Rosebud1498 location:
Huntersville, NC
 
 |  | 
Re: Critique
<Reply # 3 on 2/23/2015 9:39 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
The Second One is awesome!



Z
IndoAnomaly location:
Austin, TX
 
 |  |  | Faux Toes
Re: Critique
<Reply # 4 on 2/24/2015 5:54 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Posted by Astro
You can't even tell what the things in the photo are.



Are they not AT-ATs? That's what I thought at first.





Every time you read this, I become more powerful.

https://www.flickr...tos/115873398@N03/
Nero location:
Montréal
 
 |  | 
Re: Critique
<Reply # 5 on 3/1/2015 8:30 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
I would say that the no. 5 is my favorite. I somewhat agree with the above comments that the photo isn't very defined in terms of a strong subject and such. But I also don't think it really hurts the photograph, either. I love the colors and how the slant of the foreground on the right seems to meet with the fence coming in from the left.
With that shot, though. I would have tried to walk around the area a bit more, testing different compositions to see which one gave the best feel. I would have arranged the photo so there was more sky, and less concrete (if that's what it is). And also put the box type thing and fence into the very bottom left. That way you would be able to capture the expansiveness of the sky


[last edit 3/1/2015 8:32 PM by Nero - edited 1 times]

All throughout
Axle location:
Milton, ON
 
 |  | 
Re: Critique
<Reply # 6 on 3/2/2015 3:59 PM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
1. This is a snapshot, doesn't really have any merit imho

2. Love this one, even with the sky blown out and the lattice work gives a nice monochrome feel to it! Personal favourite from the set. Just one niggly thing, the image needs a slight rotation to make it straight.

3. Bring the angle of view up, so that your lens is pointed dead straight with the back wall.

4. Same as 3.

5. Sorry but this just seems boring, also fix the colour cast!



Celer at Audax
Para la Victoria Siempre Alemanes!
Conrad2   |  | 
Re: Critique
<Reply # 7 on 3/7/2015 12:12 AM >
Posted on Forum: UER ForumQuote
Thank you all for the feedback, much appreciated.



Infiltration Forums > UE Photo Critiques > Critique(Viewed 2163 times)
Reply

Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.

Powered by AvBoard AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
Page Generated In: 45 ms