Home
Info
Members
IRC
Photos
Forum
|
|
To2600 Web Board
Powered by AvBoard version 1.5 alpha
|
Not logged in
|
|
tunnelbug
Location: California Gender: Male Total Likes: 91 likes
| | | | | Re: BBC credibility gap < Reply # 12 on 3/1/2007 6:23 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by MutantMandias But...... even if George Bush rigged explosives in the building himself..... why would he tell a news agency about it, and then pay them to not tell anyone that he did it.... when they would have announced it all on their own when it happened anyway.... I guess I'm not smart enough for this.
| In news, there's a thing called an embargo (an agreed upon time at which news SHOULD be released indicated by the releasor). Most news agencies are given information from "authorities" under embargo, sometimes anonymously, sometimes via the Secret Service, FEMA, Mayor's office, or other agency. There are no "payoffs" or "bribes" in this scenario. The information is treated as a press release, and is often faxed to the editorial desk. News agencies give more news time from embargoes released from places like the White House or mayor's office, than they do the EPA or Greenpeace, for example. i.e.: "World Trade Center, Building 7's structure is unstable and is about to collapse." The problem with the fact that BBC knew before the building collapsed is indicative of the fact that the building was "pulled." Why? Because nobody could scientifically estimate, within a few hours, when WTC 7 would collapse, even if they knew it was structurally unstable. The only logical way to explain it is that the building was purposely brought down. It takes weeks for a demo crew to rig explosives to make a building fall... Kapish? Critics of conspiracy theorists look at the worst possible theories to debunk their claims. Most conspiracy theorists don't believe that a missile hit the pentagon, or that "george bush" himself planted the explosives -- nay, even KNEW that thermate were being planted. The simple physics speak for themselves. No agency or engineering professional has been able to conclusively explain why WTC 7 collapsed. It's still a mystery to them, and seems impossible without some effort to "pull" the building.
[last edit 3/1/2007 6:34 AM by tunnelbug - edited 5 times]
| Bearings: A Geographer's Blog Member of the CTC |
| MutantMandias Perverse and Often Baffling
Location: Atlanta, GA Gender: Male Total Likes: 268 likes
Are you a reporter? Contact me for a UE interview! Also not averse to the the idea of group/anal.
| | | | Re: BBC credibility gap < Reply # 13 on 3/1/2007 7:09 AM > | Reply with Quote
| | | How can you think that the Secret Service, FEMA, Mayor's office, or whatever other agency is simultaneously so brilliant to pull off such a monumentally huge conspiracy without falling apart completely, while also so being so incomprehensibly inept that they forget not to send out press releases that they did it? That is what you're saying, right? Some group, necessarily consisting of a large number of people involved to handle everything that needed to be handled, pulled off a months long operation, which required the subversion of multiple airlines, the planned demolition of multiple buildings, which required having unnoticed and yet constantly controlled access to the buildings, which required subverting the majority of the maintenance and possibly the janitorial staff of each building, and then, they handed the ops playbook for the day's timed activities to the media relations guy, who decided to make sure that the BBC would be prepped to announce the successful detonation of the bombs. That's not even considering the people required to handle whatever the theory-du-jour says happened with the airliners and their passengers.
So, ALL of this was pulled off masterfully, without any really obvious mistakes or flubs on their part EXCEPT that they called the BBC and said, "A building is going to fall down in 22 minutes when we push the butt.... uh.... err.... that is,.... A building is going to fall down in 22 minutes.... due to.... structural.... uh....things..... <click>"
| mutantMandias may cause dizziness, sexual nightmares, and sleep crime. ++++ mutantMandias has to return some videotapes ++++ Do not taunt mutantMandias mutantMandias is something more than human, more than a computer. mutantMandias is a murderously intelligent, sensually self-programmed, non-being |
| MutantMandias Perverse and Often Baffling
Location: Atlanta, GA Gender: Male Total Likes: 268 likes
Are you a reporter? Contact me for a UE interview! Also not averse to the the idea of group/anal.
| | | | Re: BBC credibility gap < Reply # 17 on 3/1/2007 2:41 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | It's the news. They are idiots. People sometimes say, "If you can't DO, teach." The phrase should be, "If you can't DO, report." They are idiots in the midst of pandemonium. Someone somewhere says, holy shit, that building might fall, and in the frantic, terrified moments on that morning, that can easily get sent down the line as, "The building is falling!" to "The building has fallen!"
Now, I would also like it made perfectly clear that I think the current U.S. government is among the most evil governments in the world today. Bush and Cheney should be dragged through the streets and beaten for their crimes against humanity. I believe that killing their own citizens is not beyond them by any stretch of the imagination, and that they have, in the course of 7 years, done more harm to this country than has ever been done over the nation's entire history. I know that the founding fathers, if alive today, would be conspiring in dark corners to overthrow this tyranny and return America to the people.
But, the idea that someone sent out a press release that they were blowing up a building is a little more far fetched than the inadequacies of the media during a crisis.
| mutantMandias may cause dizziness, sexual nightmares, and sleep crime. ++++ mutantMandias has to return some videotapes ++++ Do not taunt mutantMandias mutantMandias is something more than human, more than a computer. mutantMandias is a murderously intelligent, sensually self-programmed, non-being |
| MutantMandias Perverse and Often Baffling
Location: Atlanta, GA Gender: Male Total Likes: 268 likes
Are you a reporter? Contact me for a UE interview! Also not averse to the the idea of group/anal.
| | | | Re: BBC credibility gap < Reply # 19 on 3/1/2007 5:27 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by tunnelbug
You don't understand that whoever issued the press release didn't have to know the big picture.
| And you don't understand, that if the person who released your theoretical info wasn't in on the big picture, then that person might be a little curious himself as to why he's got a month old document in front of him predicting the collapse of a building at a specific moment in the future. And who the fuck would have given him the document, because, what I'm saying is, people would have to be far too inept to do any of this stuff if they didn't realize that the events happening during a simulated terrorist attack would not be handled by press releases specifying future events that are supposed to happen as a result of unexpected terrorist actions. The only way any of this makes sense is if one of my earliest comments is true. The culprets are actually the BBC, or at the very least, the BBC is an active part of the conspiracy. And it still requires a shocking level of ineptitude by these master conspirators for any of your (as yet unspecified) accusations to have even the tiniest chance of being less ridiculous than the belief that there is a god.
| mutantMandias may cause dizziness, sexual nightmares, and sleep crime. ++++ mutantMandias has to return some videotapes ++++ Do not taunt mutantMandias mutantMandias is something more than human, more than a computer. mutantMandias is a murderously intelligent, sensually self-programmed, non-being |
|
|
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
|