 |
 |
|
UER Store
|
|
order your copy of Access All Areas today!
|
|
 |
remove this banner

Livingstone
Gender: Male

| |  | Re: occupy wall street <Reply # 312 on 11/11/2011 4:54 PM >
| | | | Reply with Quote | Posted by Speed We're dragging this thread completely off topic with this little pissing match. What I'm getting at is the examples you sited were of angry black folk reacting. Just like the L.A. Riots in 1992. I don't believe these incidents validated or gave credence to the civil rights movement as you do. A movement that was wholly based and prided on non violent action and protest. Rosa Parks changed a nation and all she did was stay seated. All Ruby Bridges did was go to school. All we need to do is vote.
To me that's where the energy and rage should be directed not sleeping in tents in a park and trashing cities. I also agree very much with Dave, if you want the government to change then people need to depend on it less. It's not the governments job or responsibility to employ you, feed you or house you nor should it ever be. Like I said earlier in this thread. There's 300+ million people in this country of which 200+ million are register to vote. If that's not some pretty persuasive power then I don't know what is.
| I think this trajectory is a logical progression from comments made about the destruction of property. Those riots are an indication of the outrage around injustice, a collective sociological fact expressing itself. Policymakers of the day knew that, knew that if they didn't meet some of the demands made by MLK and his predecessors that there would a large problem on their hands. If there had been no unrest, no Malclom, Black Panther, Watts counterpart to a "civil" protest, it would have been a much longer road. I see your point about Rosa and co. She did well as she had been groomed for it for some time. Good planning was involved and it worked. Black people could now ride a bus and sit where they liked. Moneyed elites are out nothing. In the civil rights case there were no profits nor any real element of control lost in the bargain and look what that took. Minorities, in theory got their civil rights, on the rich white mans terms. It's a different game now, profits are on the line, control is on the line. Windows will be broken along with heads if there is anything that resembles a threat to profits, a threat to how power is corruptly structured. Voting as a means to change a rabidly corrupt system? Are you kidding me? that's your answer to this problem? Do you really think a candidate will get anywhere near a nomination if he isn't going to tow the line, maintain the status quo? If voting really changed anything it would not be legal. We are at a place where the system cannot be used to fix itself, it is too far gone, what we need will have to be cataclysmic. Sleeping in tents and "trashing" cities may be the start. The cancer is everywhere and we allowed it. Piper paying time. Maybe even more so today, the right to non-violent protest is a tool of the 1%, like confession to the catholic, it doesn't do anything but you may feel better. It's self help really. I wish NV could work, and it could if millions would prise themselves away from the tv or their opiate of choice to give a shit, I've my doubts. I'm going to NYC anyway. No, it isn't the government's job to employ, feed or house those who can fend for themselves. There are those who need it and those who are lazy. Weed out the lazy, starting with the corporations. The notion that we are so in debt due to fraudulent welfare claims is effing ridiculous. It's a non-problem and a distraction in relation to the real issues like corporate welfare.
| |
| dirt
Location: Oakland, CA Gender: Male
 Je suis très aimable et très caustique.
| | | |  | Re: occupy wall street <Reply # 314 on 11/11/2011 9:50 PM >
| | | | Reply with Quote | There has been a lot of discussion about the deposit of funds into my Wells Fargo client trust account. In the interests of transparency, I submit this open letter. When I volunteered the use of the account I was balancing the possibility of bad PR, with the possibility of forestalling serious physical harm to people in the jail. It was possible that there would have been mass arrests on the day of the general strike. If I have to choose between bad PR and human lives, then I will choose bad PR every time. I was informed that people had already faced seriously dangerous conditions in the jail. The night before the general strike I had no way to know that the day would not end in mass arrests at the port, or a hail of rubber bullets and wooden dowels like the anti-war port protest in 2003. A few points of clarification: 1. Why did Occupy Oakland open an account at Wells Fargo? We didn’t. My client trust account existed previously– I did not open it recently. I was in process of moving all my accounts for 5 November when I got sick. 2. So you control the money? No. The money is technically still the property of Occupy Oakland, that’s why it’s called a trust account. Occupy Oakland has ownership of the money, and dictates how it is spent. That is why the solidarity committee brought a proposal to the GA the other night– to get approval for the money to go into the client-trust account. Had the GA rejected the proposal that would have been 100% fine with me, which is what I said at the GA. Had someone else stepped up that night, that would have been 100% fine with me as well. But no one did. 3. Why didn’t Occupy Oakland just open an account in its own name? We were in the process of doing that. However, we had to file paperwork with the state of California. I, personally drove to Sacramento to file it and get it done in an expedited way. Nonetheless, we still had not received the paperwork back, and are still waiting for it. We are still in process of setting up an independent Occupy Oakland financial account. Neither a bank nor a credit union will open a bank account for an organization without showing the relevant state paperwork. 4. Well what about Long Haul? Aren’t they handling some donations on our behalf? Long Haul could not accept the money from OWS. The terms of the agreement with Long Haul forbid Occupy Oakland to use any of the deposited money for bail. Period. 5. Why didn’t you just send someone down to a credit union to open an account? Because if we sent some random person down to a CU or any institution, and they opened an account, they would take legal possession of the money. If that person had wanted to run off to Tahiti with the money, they would have been well within their legal rights to do so. 6. Why didn’t you personally just open a trust account at a credit union, it’s so simple? Actually it’s not simple. First, there was nothing I could do the night before the general strike. Second, adding steps to a process always adds uncertainty and more variables increases delay. Last week, we knew that at least one person had languished for almost 24 hours without medical care, despite a ruptured spleen. Those are not, by any stretch of the imagination, good conditions. 7. Where the hell is the money now? The money reached the client trust account today, November 9th, around noon. I have been told that another attorney has stepped forward who has a client trust account with a non-major financial institution. If this is the case and Occupy Oakland authorizes it, I will happily transfer the money to him. 8. Well fine, but you didn’t receive the money until November 9th, why not open a new account before then? I had passed the client trust account information to OWS (via people inside Occupy Oakland) on the afternoon of 3 November. I was advised that the transfer would take place immediately, so made no preparations for another account. Over the next week, I heard a variety of things from “the money is being transferred today” to “NPR has reported that the money was transferred over the weekend.” I can understand that OWS was concerned who I was, and so I offered my bar (law license) number as well as volunteering to give personal references in the Bay Area progressive community. Commentary: Had I known it would take a week, I would have simply put the word out for another attorney with a trust account in a community bank or other institution. But there was no way to know that going in. I understand that this entire event has been bad PR for Occupy Oakland and the Occupy movement generally. What I also know is that I will always choose to risk bad PR over risking people’s lives and personal safety. The mentality that Occupy is protesting is a mentality that applauds the opposite. It applauds good PR over risking people’s lives. That is the mentality of people who stand aside for corporate misbehavior, even when it costs lives. It is exactly the mentality of politicians who choose to go to bat for oligarchs and try to cut food stamp programs, rather than risk being called a socialist. It is exactly the mentality of judges who allow foreclosures even when the bank foreclosing has no case. People like that don’t want the bad PR, and they’re willing to risk other people’s lives to avoid bad PR. And that is exactly what we are fighting against. Isn’t it?
| He seemed to move among very delicate objects, on ground mined with goodness knows what precious explosives. ~ Jean Cocteau |
| KublaKhan
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
 With Satan, it's always gimmie, gimmie.
| |  | Re: occupy wall street <Reply # 317 on 11/11/2011 10:35 PM >
| | | | Reply with Quote | Posted by Speed All we need to do is vote LOVE.
|
| "The truth is knowable. But probably not, ever, incontrovertible." --Don DeLillo PICS |
| dirt
Location: Oakland, CA Gender: Male
 Je suis très aimable et très caustique.
| | | |  | Re: occupy wall street <Reply # 319 on 11/12/2011 9:17 AM >
| | | | Reply with Quote |
| He seemed to move among very delicate objects, on ground mined with goodness knows what precious explosives. ~ Jean Cocteau |
|
|

| This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2013 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy
This page was generated for you in 625 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 367679836 pages have been generated.
|
|