forums
new posts
donate
events
location db
db map
search
members
faq
terms of service
privacy policy
register
login




UER Forum > UE Main > Anyone ascend ropes using the Mitchell/Texas system? (Viewed 456 times)
Amos 


Location: MSP
Total Likes: 23 likes




 |  | 
Anyone ascend ropes using the Mitchell/Texas system?
< on 8/29/2017 2:25 AM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
I am finally getting around to owning my own climbing gear, and I have been doing some research on the various ascension systems. I only have hands-on experience with the Frog system, which seems to be pretty popular. The Frog is simple and seems to be the most gear-minimal system out there (second only to just using prussiks). I anticipate that the rappelling/ascending I will do will involve free hanging vertical drops much more so than angled slopes. It is for this reason that I find the Mitchell system to be really attractive. I know from experience that the sit-stand technique of the Frog can be extremely tiring when doing multiple or long ascents, but the Mitchell, being a rope-walking system, seems to make straight-up ascents pretty easy. The Mitchell is supposed to suck for going up slopes since the rope is attached so close to your chest, but it can easily convert into the Texas system when needed...just drop the chest harness and a foot loop and do the slope that way. The only downsides of the Mitchell that I am seeing is that it requires a little more gear than the Frog, but really, most of the weight and bulk in your gear bag comes from the rope anyways, so the addition of an extra ascender and chest box seems to be pretty negligible. I guess my biggest hesitation about going with the Mitchell system is that I haven't tried it out in person yet, whereas the Frog is already familiar. Anyone here tried out the Mitchell? What was your experience like? Anyone have experience with the Texas and how it compares to the Frog on slopes?



[last edit 8/29/2017 2:38 AM by Amos - edited 1 times]

Morbidskull 


Location: East Bay RI & SE Mass
Gender: Male
Total Likes: 11 likes




 |  | 
Re: Anyone ascend ropes using the Mitchell/Texas system?
< Reply # 1 on 8/30/2017 9:10 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
My preferred method is one hand ascender with foot loop and a grigri. Works best for free air but can be used on a slope. I mostly used it for moving around when photographing climbers so being able to quickly change from ascent to decent by only removing the hand ascender was helpful.
Back when I was an active climber I could cover 60+ feet in under a minute and 100 in two minutes.




Abby Normal 


Location: Las Vegas
Gender: Female
Total Likes: 352 likes




 |  |  | Mine Explorer
Re: Anyone ascend ropes using the Mitchell/Texas system?
< Reply # 2 on 9/6/2017 9:51 PM >
Reply with Quote
Posted on Forum: UER Forum
I use the frog system for my ascents. Being that we are crawling around old mines I like to keep the rig as simple as possible. Recently I have added a left foot ascender to go with the right foot sling and have found that I really like the setup. I'm not doing huge climbs, mostly around 100' although some have been closer to 200'.

Abby Normal




"Government is not a solution to our problem, government is the problem." Ronald Reagan
UER Forum > UE Main > Anyone ascend ropes using the Mitchell/Texas system? (Viewed 456 times)


Add a poll to this thread



This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private.



All content and images copyright 2002-2017 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site: UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service | View Privacy Policy | Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 46 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 525536557 pages have been generated.