Location: Long Island, New York Gender: Male Total Likes: 662 likes
| |
Re: Fisheye lenses in urbex photography? < Reply # 1 on 7/25/2017 7:26 PM > | Reply with Quote
Occasionally cool to look at, but not worth the money or effort to shoot myself. Changing lenses in an abandonment is how you get a dirty sensor, and I'm not bothering with a second body.
Location: The Delta Quadrant Gender: Male Total Likes: 791 likes
Resistance is Futile
| |
Re: Fisheye lenses in urbex photography? < Reply # 3 on 7/26/2017 5:26 AM > | Reply with Quote
As with anything with the fisheye lens...if is done well it can be awesome.
[02:33:56] <Valkyre> Astro your whole life is ruled by the sentence ' life is better without clothes on' [22:16:00] <DSomms> it was normal until astro got here Astro: Patron Saint of Drains
Re: Fisheye lenses in urbex photography? < Reply # 4 on 8/22/2017 5:35 PM > | Reply with Quote
For very wide areas, or closer things that are spread fairly wide and all belong in one shot, they're quite useful. Also good for adding emphasis to structure if done properly. If not, you risk just having a very warped picture with no real aesthetic benefit. They're also great for making things seem much bigger/higher than they are if you use a low angle!