|
|
|
UER Store
|
|
sweet UER decals:
|
|
|
|
Activity
|
|
852 online
Server Time:
2024-03-28 11:37:01
|
|
|
turtl
Location: Atlanta, GA Gender: Male Total Likes: 194 likes
| | | Re: Fitting the world on 35mm < Reply # 25 on 12/2/2014 4:39 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by Axle
Sorry, but no. I don't agree with that. I have filters that try a reproduce the look of APX25, Tri-X, ect ect, even Kodachrome. All stocks that I shoot and love, and they just don't look the same. Then there's digital prints vs. darkroom prints...you can't compare them. *Note: I'm not knocking digital, I shoot digital, but I just really like the look of film and I honestly things you cannot compare the two or reproduce the look of film on digital.
| Technically yes, it would be possible to, pixel by pixel, create anything digitally. But to recreate the slight nuances, inconsistencies, and perfectly imperfect qualities of film would be impossible. Even scanning my negs and slides saps the quality out of them, when looking at my slides on my light box versus on my monitor, there is simply no comparison. Wish I had the budget to print my color neg film, because I really don't like scanning it. For now i'll have to stick to black and white enlargements. RIP Kodachrome I've shot three rolls, and i've got them in my freezer, praying that some day there will once again be a way to process it. Thank ya
| |
| Adv.Pack
Location: Connecticut Total Likes: 290 likes
Adventure Pack
| | | Re: Fitting the world on 35mm < Reply # 26 on 12/2/2014 11:14 PM > | Reply with Quote
| | | Posted by Axle
Sorry, but no. I don't agree with that. I have filters that try a reproduce the look of APX25, Tri-X, ect ect, even Kodachrome. All stocks that I shoot and love, and they just don't look the same. Then there's digital prints vs. darkroom prints...you can't compare them. *Note: I'm not knocking digital, I shoot digital, but I just really like the look of film and I honestly things you cannot compare the two or reproduce the look of film on digital.
| I have never seen it done right but it is certainly possible. Film captures contrast in a totally different way than digital. I strongly prefer the "film look" personally. Thats part of why I shoot primarily film. But the fact of the matter is, ANYTHING can be created digitally with enough time, effort and the right equipment. Then you would have to be printing in a digital darkroom to properly compare the two on the same paper/medium. Im sure it could be done. Not practical at all but it could be done. Also, the results do not even have to be perfect since all films and lenses produce different looks anyways. One would just have to make the image similar to the average film look to be successful. Not exactly like a specific film.
| https://www.instagram.com/chris.kiely/ ttp://www.flickr.com/photos/adv_/ |
| |
This thread is in a public category, and can't be made private. |
|
All content and images copyright © 2002-2024 UER.CA and respective creators. Graphical Design by Crossfire.
To contact webmaster, or click to email with problems or other questions about this site:
UER CONTACT
View Terms of Service |
View Privacy Policy |
Server colocation provided by Beanfield
This page was generated for you in 109 milliseconds. Since June 23, 2002, a total of 736992012 pages have been generated.
|
|